Making a match: trends in the application, interview, and ranking process for the neurological surgery residency programs

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Neurosurgery is a highly competitive residency field with a match rate lower than that of other specialties. The aim of this study was to analyze trends associated with the residency match process from the applicants’ and program directors’ perspectives.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2020, the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) Applicant and Program Director Surveys, the NRMP Charting Outcomes reports, and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Data Resource Books were analyzed to identify the number of applicants interviewed and ranked in US programs, the applicants’ ranking preferences, the program directors’ preferential factors in offering interviews, and rank list order. Applicants were divided between US senior medical students and independent applicants. Each cohort was dichotomized for matched and unmatched applicants.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 2935 applicants applied to neurosurgery residency, including 2135 US senior medical students and 800 independent applicants, with an overall match rate of 65%. Overall, matched applicants had a significantly higher number of publications (p < 0.05). Among US senior medical student applicants, the application-to-interview ratio more than doubled over the study period, yet the number of interview invitations received, interviews accepted, and programs ranked remained unchanged. In the US senior medical student cohort, the number of submitted applications, interview invitations, accepted interviews, and programs ranked did not significantly differ between matched and unmatched applicants. In both cohorts, applicants shifted ranking factors from a more academic focus in early years to more well-being in later years. Letters of recommendation and board scores were key factors for program directors while screening applicants for interviews and ranking.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurosurgery residency continues to be a highly competitive field in medicine, with match rates of 65%. Recently, applicants have placed greater importance on ranking programs that value residents’ well-being, as opposed to strictly academic factors. A data-driven understanding of factors important to applicants and program directors during the match process has the potential to improve resident candidate recruitment and overall resident-program fit, thereby improving well-being during residency, reducing the attrition rate, and overall enhancing the diversity of the neurosurgery resident workforce.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACGME = Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; AΩA = Alpha Omega Alpha; NRMP = National Residency Matching Program; USMLE = US Medical Licensing Examination.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Isabelle M. Germano: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY. isabelle.germano@mountsinai.org.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online May 28, 2021; DOI: 10.3171/2020.11.JNS203637.

Disclosures Dr. Germano: consultant for Brainlab and Integra and direct stock ownership in Integra, Elminda, and Surgical Theater.

  • 1

    Leveroos EH, Von Ehren WR. Approved internships and residencies in the United States; annual report of internships and residencies by the Council on Medical Education and Hospitals of the American Medical Association. J Am Med Assoc. 1953;153(4):275281.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Yaeger KA, Munich SA, Byrne RW, Germano IM. Trends in United States neurosurgery residency education and training over the last decade (2009–2019). Neurosurg Focus. 2020;48(3):E6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Friedman WA. Resident duty hours in American neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(4):925933.

  • 4

    Warm EJ, Edgar L, Kelleher M, et al. . A Guidebook for Implementing and Changing Assessment in the Milestones Era. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2020.Accessed January 6, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/MilestonesImplementation2020.pdf?ver=2020-05-20-152402-013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Weiss KB, Wagner R, Bagian JP, et al. . Advances in the ACGME Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER) program. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(4):718721.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Burford C, Hanrahan J, Ansaripour A, et al. . Factors influencing medical student interest in a career in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg.2019;122:e367e374.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Agarwal N, White MD, Pannullo SC, Chambless LB. Analysis of national trends in neurosurgical resident attrition. J Neurosurg. 2019;131(5):16681673.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Khoushhal Z, Hussain MA, Greco E, et al. . Prevalence and causes of attrition among surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):265272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Sullivan MC, Yeo H, Roman SA, et al. . Surgical residency and attrition: defining the individual and programmatic factors predictive of trainee losses. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):461471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    National Resident Matching Program. Results of the 2011 NRMP Applicant Survey. Accessed January 6, 2021. http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    National Resident Matching Program. Results of the 2013 NRMP Applicant Survey. Accessed January 6, 2021. http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    National Resident Matching Program. Results of the 2015 NRMP Applicant Survey. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    National Resident Matching Program. Results of the 2017 NRMP Applicant Survey. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    National Resident Matching Program. Results of the 2010 NRMP Program Director Survey. Accessed January 6, 2021. http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    National Resident Matching Program. Results of the 2012 NRMP Program Director Survey. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    National Resident Matching Program. Results of the 2014 NRMP Program Director Survey. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    National Resident Matching Program. Results of the 2016 NRMP Program Director Survey. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2010 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2011 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2012 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2013 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2014 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2015 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2016 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2017 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2018 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2019 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Data Resource Book. Academic Year 2010-2011. Accessed January 6, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/About-Us/Publications-and-Resources/Graduate-Medical-Education-Data-Resource-Book

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Data Resource Book. Academic Year 2011-2012. Accessed January 6, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/About-Us/Publications-and-Resources/Graduate-Medical-Education-Data-Resource-Book

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Data Resource Book. Academic Year 2012-2013. Accessed January 6, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/About-Us/Publications-and-Resources/Graduate-Medical-Education-Data-Resource-Book

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Data Resource Book. Academic Year 2013-2014. Accessed January 6, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/About-Us/Publications-and-Resources/Graduate-Medical-Education-Data-Resource-Book

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Data Resource Book. Academic Year 2014-2015. Accessed January 6, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/About-Us/Publications-and-Resources/Graduate-Medical-Education-Data-Resource-Book

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Data Resource Book. Academic Year 2015-2016. Accessed January 6, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/About-Us/Publications-and-Resources/Graduate-Medical-Education-Data-Resource-Book

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Data Resource Book. Academic Year 2016-2017. Accessed January 6, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/About-Us/Publications-and-Resources/Graduate-Medical-Education-Data-Resource-Book

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Data Resource Book. Academic Year 2017-2018. Accessed January 6, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/About-Us/Publications-and-Resources/Graduate-Medical-Education-Data-Resource-Book

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    National Resident Matching Program. Charting outcomes in the match: 2014 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    National Resident Matching Program. Charting outcomes in the match: 2018 main residency match. Accessed January 6, 2021.http://www.nrmp.org/report-archives/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Leschke JM, Hunt MA. Electronic residency application service application characteristics associated with successful residency matching in neurosurgery in 2009-2016. World Neurosurg. 2018;113:e529e534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Durham SR, Donaldson K, Grady MS, Benzil DL. Analysis of the 1990–2007 neurosurgery residency match: does applicant gender affect neurosurgery match outcome?. J Neurosurg. 2018;129(2):282289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Love JN, Doty CI, Smith JL, et al. . The Emergency Medicine Group Standardized Letter of Evaluation as a workplace-based assessment: the validity is in the detail. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(3):600609.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 751 751 751
Full Text Views 76 76 76
PDF Downloads 82 82 82
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0