The cisternal pulvinar is a challenging location for neurosurgery. Four approaches for reaching the pulvinar without cortical transgression are the ipsilateral supracerebellar infratentorial (iSCIT), contralateral supracerebellar infratentorial (cSCIT), ipsilateral occipital transtentorial (iOCTT), and contralateral occipital transtentorial/falcine (cOCTF) approaches. This study quantitatively compared these approaches in terms of surgical exposure and maneuverability.
Each of the 4 approaches was performed in 4 cadaveric heads (8 specimens in total). A 6-sided anatomical polygonal region was configured over the cisternal pulvinar, defined by 6 reachable anatomical points in different vectors. Multiple polygons were subsequently formed to calculate the areas of exposure. The surgical freedom of each approach was calculated as the maximum allowable working area at the proximal end of a probe, with the distal end fixed at the posterior pole of the pulvinar. Areas of exposure, surgical freedom, and the working distance (surgical depth) of all approaches were compared.
No significant difference was found among the 4 different approaches with regard to the surgical depth, surgical freedom, or medial exposure area of the pulvinar. In the pairwise comparison, the cSCIT approach provided a significantly larger lateral exposure (39 ± 9.8 mm2) than iSCIT (19 ± 10.3 mm2, p < 0.01), iOCTT (19 ± 8.2 mm2, p < 0.01), and cOCTF (28 ± 7.3 mm2, p = 0.02) approaches. The total exposure area with a cSCIT approach (75 ± 23.1 mm2) was significantly larger than with iOCTT (43 ± 16.4 mm2, p < 0.01) and iSCIT (40 ± 20.2 mm2, p = 0.01) approaches (pairwise, p ≤ 0.01).
The cSCIT approach is preferable among the 4 compared approaches, demonstrating better exposure to the cisternal pulvinar than ipsilateral approaches and a larger lateral exposure than the cOCTF approach. Both contralateral approaches described (cSCIT and cOCTF) provided enhanced lateral exposure to the pulvinar, while the cOCTF provided a larger exposure to the lateral portion of the pulvinar than the iOCTT. Medial exposure and maneuverability did not differ among the approaches. A short tentorium may negatively impact an ipsilateral approach because the cingulate isthmus and parahippocampal gyrus tend to protrude, in which case they can obstruct access to the cisternal pulvinar ipsilaterally.
Cohen-CohenSCohen-GadolAAGomez-AmadorJLAlves-BeloJTShahKJFernandez-MirandaJC: Supracerebellar infratentorial and occipital transtentorial approaches to the pulvinar: ipsilateral versus contralateral corridors. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)16:351–3592019
GunnarutIBurkhardtJKNeidertMCBozinovO: Endoscopic and gravity-assisted resection of medial temporo-occipital lesions through a supracerebellar transtentorial approach: technical notes with case illustrations. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)13:E541–E5422017
GunnarutI, BurkhardtJK, NeidertMC, BozinovO: Endoscopic and gravity-assisted resection of medial temporo-occipital lesions through a supracerebellar transtentorial approach: technical notes with case illustrations. 13:E541–E542, 201710.1093/ons/opw041)| false
JittapiromsakPDeshmukhPNakajiPSpetzlerRFPreulMC: Comparative analysis of posterior approaches to the medial temporal region: supracerebellar transtentorial versus occipital transtentorial. Neurosurgery64 (3 Suppl):ons35–ons432009
KawashimaMRhotonALJrMatsushimaT: Comparison of posterior approaches to the posterior incisural space: microsurgical anatomy and proposal of a new method, the occipital bi-transtentorial/falcine approach. Neurosurgery51:1208–12212002
KawashimaM, RhotonALJr, MatsushimaT: Comparison of posterior approaches to the posterior incisural space: microsurgical anatomy and proposal of a new method, the occipital bi-transtentorial/falcine approach. 51:1208–1221, 200210.1097/00006123-200211000-0001712383366)| false
ShinHJ, ChoBK, JungHW, WangKC: Pediatric pineal tumors: need for a direct surgical approach and complications of the occipital transtentorial approach. 14:174–178, 199810.1007/s0038100502069660118)| false
SteigerHJ, GötzC, Schmid-ElsaesserR, StummerW: Thalamic astrocytomas: surgical anatomy and results of a pilot series using maximum microsurgical removal. 142:1327–1337, 200010.1007/s00701007000111214625)| false
YamadaK, MaseM, MatsumotoT: Surgery for deeply seated arteriovenous malformation: with special reference to thalamic and striatal arteriovenous malformation. 38 (Suppl):227–230, 19981023501010.2176/nmc.38.suppl_227)| false
YaşargilMG: Microneurosurgery Vol I. Microsurgical Anatomy of the Basal Cisterns and Vessels of the Brain Diagnostic Studies General Operative Techniques and Pathological Considerations of the Intracranial Aneurysms. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme1984
YaşargilMG: . Stuttgart: Georg Thieme, 1984)| false