Editorial. The delivery of stroke intervention in the community: is telerobotic endovascular surgery the solution?

Restricted access

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Nicholas C. Bambakidis: nicholas.bambakidis2@uhhospitals.org.ACCOMPANYING ARTICLE DOI: 10.3171/2019.8.JNS191739.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online November 29, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.10.JNS192195.Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Adeoye ONyström KVYavagal DRLuciano JNogueira RGZorowitz RD: Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: a 2019 update. Stroke 50:e187e2102019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Berkhemer OAFransen PSBeumer Dvan den Berg LALingsma HFYoo AJ: A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:11202015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Britz GWTomas JLumsden A: Feasibility of robotic-assisted neurovascular interventions: initial experience in flow model and porcine model. Neurosurgery [epub ahead of print] 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Campbell BCMitchell PJKleinig TJDewey HMChurilov LYassi N: Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 372:100910182015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Goyal MDemchuk AMMenon BKEesa MRempel JLThornton J: Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:101910302015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Jovin TGChamorro ACobo Ede Miquel MAMolina CARovira A: Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:229623062015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Mahmud ENaghi JAng LHarrison JBehnamfar OPourdjabbar A: Demonstration of the safety and feasibility of robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:132013272017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Panesar SSVolpi JJLumsden ADesai VKleiman NSSample TL: Telerobotic stroke intervention: a novel solution to the care dissemination dilemma. J Neurosurg [epub ahead of print November 29 2019. DOI: 10.3171/2019.8.JNS191739]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Patel TMShah SCPancholy SB: Long distance tele-robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: first-in-human experience. EClinicalMedicine 14:53582019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Saver JLGoyal MBonafe ADiener HCLevy EIPereira VM: Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 372:228522952015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Saver JLGoyal Mvan der Lugt AMenon BKMajoie CBDippel DW: Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA 316:127912882016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Shah SXian YSheng SZachrison KSSaver JLSheth KN: Use, temporal trends, and outcomes of endovascular therapy after interhospital transfer in the United States. Circulation 139:156815772019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Weisz GMetzger DCCaputo RPDelgado JAMarshall JJVetrovec GW: Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:159616002013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1

    Adeoye OAlbright KCCarr BGWolff CMullen MTAbruzzo T: Geographic access to acute stroke care in the United States. Stroke 45:301930242014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Behnamfar OPourdjabbar AYalvac EReeves RMahmud E: First case of robotic percutaneous vascular intervention for below-the-knee peripheral arterial disease. J Invasive Cardiol 28:E128E1312016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Britz GWTomas JLumsden A: Feasibility of robotic-assisted neurovascular interventions: initial experience in flow model and porcine model. Neurosurgery [epub ahead of print] 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Fargen KMArthur ASLeslie-Mazwi TGarner RMAschenbrenner CAWolfe SQ: A survey of burnout and professional satisfaction among United States neurointerventionalists. J Neurointerv Surg 11:110011042019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Gupta RHorev ANguyen TGandhi DWisco DGlenn BA: Higher volume endovascular stroke centers have faster times to treatment, higher reperfusion rates and higher rates of good clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 5:2942972013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Kavoussi LRMoore RGAdams JBPartin AW: Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 154:213421361995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Lanfranco ARCastellanos AEDesai JPMeyers WC: Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239:14212004

  • 8

    Mahmud EDominguez ABahadorani J: First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 88:5655702016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Mahmud ENaghi JAng LHarrison JBehnamfar OPourdjabbar A: Demonstration of the safety and feasibility of robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:132013272017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Mahmud ESchmid FKalmar PDeutschmann HHafner FRief P: Feasibility and safety of robotic peripheral vascular interventions: result of the RAPID trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9:205820642016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Memon SHeriot AGMurphy DGBressel MLynch AC: Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:209521012012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Panesar SSBritz GW: Endovascular robotics: the future of cerebrovascular surgery. World Neurosurg 129:3273292019

  • 13

    Patel TMShah SCPancholy SB: Long distance tele-robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: first-in-human experience. EClinicalMedicine 14:53582019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Yohannes PRotariu PPinto PSmith ADLee BR: Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60:39452002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 44 44 44
Full Text Views 23 23 23
PDF Downloads 15 15 15
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar