The brainstem is a compact, delicate structure. The surgeon must have good anatomical knowledge of the safe entry points to safely resect intrinsic lesions. Lesions located at the lateral midbrain surface are better approached through the lateral mesencephalic sulcus (LMS). The goal of this study was to compare the surgical exposure to the LMS provided by the subtemporal (ST) approach and the paramedian and extreme-lateral variants of the supracerebellar infratentorial (SCIT) approach.
These 3 approaches were used in 10 cadaveric heads. The authors performed measurements of predetermined points by using a neuronavigation system. Areas of microsurgical exposure and angles of the approaches were determined. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences in the respective exposures.
The surgical exposure was similar for the different approaches—369.8 ± 70.1 mm2 for the ST; 341.2 ± 71.2 mm2 for the SCIT paramedian variant; and 312.0 ± 79.3 mm2 for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant (p = 0.13). However, the vertical angular exposure was 16.3° ± 3.6° for the ST, 19.4° ± 3.4° for the SCIT paramedian variant, and 25.1° ± 3.3° for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant craniotomy (p < 0.001). The horizontal angular exposure was 45.2° ± 6.3° for the ST, 35.6° ± 2.9° for the SCIT paramedian variant, and 45.5° ± 6.6° for the SCIT extreme-lateral variant opening, presenting no difference between the ST and extreme-lateral variant (p = 0.92), but both were superior to the paramedian variant (p < 0.001). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
The extreme-lateral SCIT approach had the smaller area of surgical exposure; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The extreme-lateral SCIT approach presented a wider vertical and horizontal angle to the LMS compared to the other craniotomies. Also, it provides a 90° trajectory to the sulcus that facilitates the intraoperative microsurgical technique.
AblaAALekovicGPTurnerJDde OliveiraJGPorterRSpetzlerRF: Advances in the treatment and outcome of brainstem cavernous malformation surgery: a single-center case series of 300 surgically treated patients. Neurosurgery68:403–4152011
CavalcantiDDGarcía-GonzálezUAgrawalACrawfordNRTavaresPLSpetzlerRF: Quantitative anatomic study of the transciliary supraorbital approach: benefits of additional orbital osteotomy?Neurosurgery66 (6 Suppl Operative):205–2102010
DeshmukhVRFigueiredoEGDeshmukhPCrawfordNRPreulMCSpetzlerRF: Quantification and comparison of telovelar and transvermian approaches to the fourth ventricle. Neurosurgery58 (4 Suppl 2):ONS-202–ONS-2072006
FigueiredoEGDeshmukhPZabramskiJMPreulMCCrawfordNRSiwanuwatnR: Quantitative anatomic study of three surgical approaches to the anterior communicating artery complex. Neurosurgery56 (2 Suppl):397–4052005
FigueiredoEGDeshmukhVNakajiPDeshmukhPCrusiusMUCrawfordN: An anatomical evaluation of the mini-supraorbital approach and comparison with standard craniotomies. Neurosurgery59 (4 Suppl 2):ONS212–ONS2202006
FigueiredoEGZabramskiJMDeshmukhPCrawfordNRPreulMCSpetzlerRF: Anatomical and quantitative description of the transcavernous approach to interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns. Technical note. J Neurosurg104:957–9642006
FigueiredoEGZabramskiJMDeshmukhPCrawfordNRSpetzlerRFPreulMC: Comparative analysis of anterior petrosectomy and transcavernous approaches to retrosellar and upper clival basilar artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery58 (1 Suppl):ONS13–ONS212006
GonzalezLFCrawfordNRHorganMADeshmukhPZabramskiJMSpetzlerRF: Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery50:550–5572002
RecaldeRJFigueiredoEGde OliveiraE: Microsurgical anatomy of the safe entry zones on the anterolateral brainstem related to surgical approaches to cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery62 (3 Suppl 1):9–172008
Safavi-AbbasiSde OliveiraJGDeshmukhPReisCVBrasilienseLBCrawfordNR: The craniocaudal extension of posterolateral approaches and their combination: a quantitative anatomic and clinical analysis. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)66 (suppl_1):54–642010
SiwanuwatnRDeshmukhPFigueiredoEGCrawfordNRSpetzlerRFPreulMC: Quantitative analysis of the working area and angle of attack for the retrosigmoid, combined petrosal, and transcochlear approaches to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg104:137–1422006
VishtehAGDavidCAMarcianoFFCoscarellaESpetzlerRF: Extreme lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach to the posterolateral mesencephalon: technique and clinical experience. Neurosurgery46:384–3892000
Vitorino AraujoJLVeigaJCEWenHTde AndradeAFTeixeiraMJOtochJP: Comparative anatomical analysis of the transcallosal-transchoroidal and transcallosal-transforniceal-transchoroidal approaches to the third ventricle. J Neurosurg127:209–2182017
VoigtKYaşargilMG: Cerebral cavernous haemangiomas or cavernomas. Incidence, pathology, localization, diagnosis, clinical features and treatment. Review of the literature and report of an unusual case. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg)19:59–681976