Defining a new neurosurgical complication classification: lessons learned from a monthly Morbidity and Mortality conference

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

The absence of a commonly accepted standardized classification system for complication reporting confounds the recognition, objective reporting, management, and avoidance of perioperative adverse events. In the past decade, several classification systems have been proposed for use in neurosurgery, but these generally focus on tallying specific complications and grading their effect on patient morbidity. Herein, the authors propose and prospectively validate a new neurosurgical complication classification based on understanding the underlying causes of the adverse events.

METHODS

A new complication classification system was devised based on the authors’ previous work on morbidity in endovascular surgery. Adverse events were prospectively compiled for all neurosurgical procedures performed at their tertiary care academic medical center over the course of 1 year into 5 subgroups: 1) indication errors; 2) procedural errors; 3) technical errors; 4) judgment errors; and 5) critical events. The complications were presented at the monthly institutional Morbidity and Mortality conference where, following extensive discussion, they were assigned to one of the 5 subgroups. Additional subgroup analyses by neurosurgical subspecialty were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 115 neurosurgical complications were observed and analyzed during the study period. Of these, nearly half were critical events, while technical errors accounted for approximately one-third of all complications. Within neurosurgical subspecialties, vascular neurosurgery (36.5%) had the most complications, followed by spine & peripheral nerve (21.7%), neuro-oncology (14.8%), cranial trauma (13.9%), general neurosurgery (12.2%), and functional neurosurgery (0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors’ novel neurosurgical complication classification system was successfully implemented in a prospective manner at their high-volume tertiary medical center. By employing the well-established Morbidity and Mortality conference mechanism, this simple system may be easily applied at other neurosurgical centers and may allow for uniform analyses of perioperative morbidity and the introduction of corrective initiatives.

Article Information

Correspondence Philipp Taussky: Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. neuropub@hsc.utah.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online January 18, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2018.9.JNS181004.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Distribution of complications by neurosurgical subspecialty stratified by complication subclass. Figure is available in color online only.

References

1

Bonsanto MMHamer JTronnier VKunze S: A complication conference for internal quality control at the Neurosurgical Department of the University of Heidelberg. Acta Neurochir Suppl 78:1391452001

2

Clavien PASanabria JRStrasberg SM: Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:5185261992

3

Dindo DDemartines NClavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:2052132004

4

Fugate JE: Complications of neurosurgery. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 21 (5 Neurocritical Care):142514442015

5

Healy MAMullard AJCampbell DA JrDimick JB: Hospital and payer costs associated with surgical complications. JAMA Surg 151:8238302016

6

Houkin KBaba TMinamida YNonaka TKoyanagi IIiboshi S: Quantitative analysis of adverse events in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 65:5875942009

7

Landriel Ibañez FAHem SAjler PVecchi ECiraolo CBaccanelli M: A new classification of complications in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 75:709715604–6112011

8

Lebude BYadla SAlbert TAnderson DGHarrop JSHilibrand A: Defining “complications” in spine surgery: neurosurgery and orthopedic spine surgeons’ survey. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:4935002010

9

Porter ME: What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 363:247724812010

10

Rampersaud YRMoro ERNeary MAWhite KLewis SJMassicotte EM: Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:150315102006

11

Ravindra VMMazur MDPark MSKilburg CMoran CJHardman RL: Complications in endovascular neurosurgery: critical analysis and classification. World Neurosurg 95:182016

12

Rolston JDHan SJLau CYBerger MSParsa AT: Frequency and predictors of complications in neurological surgery: national trends from 2006 to 2011. J Neurosurg 120:7367452014

13

Siqueira EMPDiccini S: Postoperative complications in elective and non-elective neurosurgery. Acta Paul Enferm 30:1011082017

14

Van Den Bos JRustagi KGray THalford MZiemkiewicz EShreve J: The $17.1 billion problem: the annual cost of measurable medical errors. Health Aff (Millwood) 30:5966032011

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 906 906 906
Full Text Views 168 168 168
PDF Downloads 128 128 128
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar