Prospective clinical validation of a meningioma consistency grading scheme: association with surgical outcomes and extent of tumor resection

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to assess the clinical utility of a previously validated intraoperative meningioma consistency grading scale and its association with extent of resection (EOR) and various surgical outcomes.

METHODS

The previously validated grading system was prospectively assessed in 127 consecutive patients undergoing open craniotomy for meningioma by multiple neurosurgeons at two high-volume academic hospitals from 2013 to 2016. Consistency grading scores ranging from 1 (soft) to 5 (firm/calcified) were retrospectively analyzed to test for association with surgical outcomes and EOR, categorized as gross-total resection (GTR) or subtotal resection, defined by postoperative MRI.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven patients were included in the analysis with a tumor consistency distribution as follows: grade 1, 3.1%; grade 2, 14.2%; grade 3, 44.1%; grade 4, 32.3%; and grade 5, 6.3%. The mean tumor diameter was 3.6 ± 1.7 cm. Tumor consistency grades were grouped into soft (grades 1 and 2), average (grade 3), and firm (grades 4 and 5) groups for statistical analysis with distributions of 17.3%, 44.1%, and 38.6%, respectively. There was no association between meningioma consistency and maximal tumor diameter, or location. Mean duration of surgery was longer for tumors with higher consistency: grades 1 and 2, 186 minutes; grade 3, 219 minutes; and grades 4 and 5, 299 minutes (p = 0.000028). There was a trend toward higher perioperative complication rates for tumors of increased consistency: grades 1 and 2, 4.5%; grade 3, 7.0%; and grades 4 and 5, 20.8% (p = 0.047). The proportion of GTR for each consistency group was as follows: grades 1 and 2, 77%; grade 3, 68%; and grades 4 and 5, 43% (p = 0.0062).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to other important meningioma characteristics such as invasiveness, tumor consistency is a key determinant of surgical outcomes, including operative duration and EOR. Future studies predicting tumor consistency based on preoperative neuroimaging will help considerably with preoperative planning for meningiomas.

ABBREVIATIONS EOR = extent of resection; GTR = gross-total resection; USC = University of Southern California.

Article Information

Correspondence Ki-Eun Chang: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. ki.chang14@gmail.com.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online December 14, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.JNS1838.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Graphic representation of the correlation between tumor location and consistency score. Figure is available in color online only.

  • View in gallery

    Graphic representation of the correlation between extent of resection (GTR/subtotal resection [STR]) and consistency score. *p < 0.05. Figure is available in color online only.

References

  • 1

    Chen TCZee CSMiller CAWeiss MHTang GChin L: Magnetic resonance imaging and pathological correlates of meningiomas. Neurosurgery 31:101510221992

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Hoover JMMorris JMMeyer FB: Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency. Surg Neurol Int 2:1422011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Hughes JDFattahi NVan Gompel JArani AMeyer FLanzino G: Higher-resolution magnetic resonance elastography in meningiomas to determine intratumoral consistency. Neurosurgery 77:6536592015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Igressa APechlivanis IWeber FMahvash MAyyad ABoutarbouch M: Endoscope-assisted keyhole surgery via an eyebrow incision for removal of large meningiomas of the anterior and middle cranial fossa. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 129:27332015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Khan OHAnand VKSchwartz TH: Endoscopic endonasal resection of skull base meningiomas: the significance of a “cortical cuff” and brain edema compared with careful case selection and surgical experience in predicting morbidity and extent of resection. Neurosurg Focus 37(4):E72014

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Little KMFriedman AHSampson JHWanibuchi MFukushima T: Surgical management of petroclival meningiomas: defining resection goals based on risk of neurological morbidity and tumor recurrence rates in 137 patients. Neurosurgery 56:5465592005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Mawrin CPerry A: Pathological classification and molecular genetics of meningiomas. J Neurooncol 99:3793912010

  • 8

    Murphy MCHuston J IIIGlaser KJManduca AMeyer FBLanzino G: Preoperative assessment of meningioma stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography. J Neurosurg 118:6436482013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Muthupillai RLomas DJRossman PJGreenleaf JFManduca AEhman RL: Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science 269:185418571995

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Ortega-Porcayo LABallesteros-Zebadúa PMarrufo-Meléndez ORRamírez-Andrade JJBarges-Coll JTecante A: Prediction of mechanical properties and subjective consistency of meningiomas using T1-T2 assessment versus fractional anisotropy. World Neurosurg 84:169116982015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Rehder RCohen AR: Endoscope-assisted microsurgical subtemporal keyhole approach to the posterolateral suprasellar region and basal cisterns. World Neurosurg 103:1141212017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Rogers LBarani IChamberlain MKaley TJMcDermott MRaizer J: Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review. J Neurosurg 122:4232015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Romani RTang WJMao YWang DJTang HLZhu FP: Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the consistency of intracranial meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:183718452014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Shiroishi MSCen SYTamrazi BD’Amore FLerner AKing KS: Predicting meningioma consistency on preoperative neuroimaging studies. Neurosurg Clin N Am 27:1451542016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Sitthinamsuwan BKhampalikit INunta-aree SSrirabheebhat PWitthiwej TNitising A: Predictors of meningioma consistency: a study in 243 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:138313892012

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Stafford SLPerry ASuman VJMeyer FBScheithauer BWLohse CM: Primarily resected meningiomas: outcome and prognostic factors in 581 Mayo Clinic patients, 1978 through 1988. Mayo Clin Proc 73:9369421998

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Suzuki YSugimoto TShibuya MSugita KPatel SJ: Meningiomas: correlation between MRI characteristics and operative findings including consistency. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 129:39461994

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Watanabe KKakeda SYamamoto JIde SOhnari NNishizawa S: Prediction of hard meningiomas: quantitative evaluation based on the magnetic resonance signal intensity. Acta Radiol 57:3333402016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Xu LLin YHan JCXi ZNShen HGao PY: Magnetic resonance elastography of brain tumors: preliminary results. Acta Radiol 48:3273302007

  • 20

    Yamaguchi NKawase TSagoh MOhira TShiga HToya S: Prediction of consistency of meningiomas with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Neurol 48:5795831997

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Yamamoto JKakeda SShimajiri STakahashi MWatanabe KKai Y: Tumor consistency of pituitary macroadenomas: predictive analysis on the basis of imaging features with contrast-enhanced 3D FIESTA at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:2973032014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Yano SHide TShinojima NHasegawa YKawano TKuratsu J: Endoscopic endonasal skull base approach for parasellar lesions: initial experiences, results, efficacy, and complications. Surg Neurol Int 5:512014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Zada GYashar PRobison AWiner JKhalessi AMack WJ: A proposed grading system for standardizing tumor consistency of intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 35(6):E12013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 407 407 26
Full Text Views 106 106 2
PDF Downloads 68 68 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar