Prospective clinical validation of a meningioma consistency grading scheme: association with surgical outcomes and extent of tumor resection

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to assess the clinical utility of a previously validated intraoperative meningioma consistency grading scale and its association with extent of resection (EOR) and various surgical outcomes.

METHODS

The previously validated grading system was prospectively assessed in 127 consecutive patients undergoing open craniotomy for meningioma by multiple neurosurgeons at two high-volume academic hospitals from 2013 to 2016. Consistency grading scores ranging from 1 (soft) to 5 (firm/calcified) were retrospectively analyzed to test for association with surgical outcomes and EOR, categorized as gross-total resection (GTR) or subtotal resection, defined by postoperative MRI.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven patients were included in the analysis with a tumor consistency distribution as follows: grade 1, 3.1%; grade 2, 14.2%; grade 3, 44.1%; grade 4, 32.3%; and grade 5, 6.3%. The mean tumor diameter was 3.6 ± 1.7 cm. Tumor consistency grades were grouped into soft (grades 1 and 2), average (grade 3), and firm (grades 4 and 5) groups for statistical analysis with distributions of 17.3%, 44.1%, and 38.6%, respectively. There was no association between meningioma consistency and maximal tumor diameter, or location. Mean duration of surgery was longer for tumors with higher consistency: grades 1 and 2, 186 minutes; grade 3, 219 minutes; and grades 4 and 5, 299 minutes (p = 0.000028). There was a trend toward higher perioperative complication rates for tumors of increased consistency: grades 1 and 2, 4.5%; grade 3, 7.0%; and grades 4 and 5, 20.8% (p = 0.047). The proportion of GTR for each consistency group was as follows: grades 1 and 2, 77%; grade 3, 68%; and grades 4 and 5, 43% (p = 0.0062).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to other important meningioma characteristics such as invasiveness, tumor consistency is a key determinant of surgical outcomes, including operative duration and EOR. Future studies predicting tumor consistency based on preoperative neuroimaging will help considerably with preoperative planning for meningiomas.

ABBREVIATIONS EOR = extent of resection; GTR = gross-total resection; USC = University of Southern California.

Article Information

Correspondence Ki-Eun Chang: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. ki.chang14@gmail.com.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online December 14, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.JNS1838.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Graphic representation of the correlation between tumor location and consistency score. Figure is available in color online only.

  • View in gallery

    Graphic representation of the correlation between extent of resection (GTR/subtotal resection [STR]) and consistency score. *p < 0.05. Figure is available in color online only.

References

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 381 381 65
Full Text Views 104 104 3
PDF Downloads 65 65 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar