Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) are increasingly being incorporated into the neurosurgeon’s armamentarium for treatment of various pathologies, including paraclinoid aneurysms. However, few anatomical assessments have been performed on the use of EEA for this purpose. The aim of the present study was to provide a comprehensive anatomical assessment of the EEA for the treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms.
Five cadaveric heads underwent an endonasal transplanum-transtuberculum approach to expose the paraclinoid area. The feasibility of obtaining proximal and distal internal carotid artery (ICA) control as well as the topographic location of the origin of the ophthalmic artery (OphA) relative to dural landmarks were assessed. Limitations of the EEA in exposing the supraclinoid ICA were also recorded to identify favorable paraclinoid ICA aneurysm projections for EEA.
The extracavernous paraclival and clinoidal ICAs were favorable segments for establishing proximal control. Clipping the extracavernous ICA risked injury to the trigeminal and abducens nerves, whereas clipping the clinoidal segment put the oculomotor nerve at risk. The OphA origin was found within 4 mm of the medial opticocarotid point on a line connecting the midtubercular recess point to the medial vertex of the lateral opticocarotid recess. An average 7.2-mm length of the supraclinoid ICA could be safely clipped for distal control. Assessments showed that small superiorly or medially projecting aneurysms were favorable candidates for clipping via EEA.
When used for paraclinoid aneurysms, the EEA carries certain risks to adjacent neurovascular structures during proximal control, dural opening, and distal control. While some authors have promoted this approach as feasible, this work demonstrates that it has significant limitations and may only be appropriate in highly selected cases that are not amenable to coiling or clipping. Further clinical experience with this approach helps to delineate its risks and benefits.
EddlemanCSBatjerHH: Comment on “Germanwala AV, Zanation AM: Endoscopic endonasal approach for clipping of ruptured and unruptured paraclinoid cerebral aneurysms: case report.” Neurosurgery68 (Suppl):onsE2402011
ForbesJAD’ HerbemontSLehnerKRPineda MartinezDNavarro-ChávezIPMendez RositoD: Feasibility of endoscopic endonasal approach for clip application of cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Sci[epub ahead of print] 2018
KamideTTabaniHSafaeeMMBurkhardtJKLawtonMT: Microsurgical clipping of ophthalmic artery aneurysms: surgical results and visual outcomes with 208 aneurysms. J Neurosurg[epub ahead of print January 26 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2017.7.JNS17673]
KassamABPrevedelloDMCarrauRLSnydermanCHGardnerPOsawaS: The front door to Meckel’s cave: an anteromedial corridor via expanded endoscopic endonasal approach—technical considerations and clinical series. Neurosurgery64 (3 Suppl):ons71–ons832009
LabibMAPrevedelloDMCarrauRKerrEENaudyCAbou Al-ShaarH: A road map to the internal carotid artery in expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches to the ventral cranial base. Neurosurgery10 (Suppl 3):448–4712014
LabibMAPrevedelloDMFernandez-MirandaJCSivakanthanSBenetAMoreraV: The medial opticocarotid recess: an anatomic study of an endoscopic “key landmark” for the ventral cranial base. Neurosurgery72 (1 Suppl Operative):66–762013
LinNBrouillardAMKeigherKMLopesDKBinningMJLiebmanKM: Utilization of Pipeline embolization device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: US multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg7:808–8152015
LiuJKSchmidtRFChoudhryOJShuklaPAEloyJA: Surgical nuances for nasoseptal flap reconstruction of cranial base defects with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks after endoscopic skull base surgery. Neurosurg Focus32(6):E72012
Peris-CeldaMKucukyurukBMonroy-SosaAFunakiTValentineRRhotonALJr: The recesses of the sellar wall of the sphenoid sinus and their intracranial relationships. Neurosurgery73 (2 Suppl Operative):ons117–ons1312013
PribitkinEAMcJunkinJKungBCarrascoJRBilykJRSavinoPJ: Technique selection for orbital decompression: combined endoscopic and transconjunctival versus combined endoscopic and transantral approach. Ear Nose Throat J88:E122009
ShimizuKImamuraHMineharuYAdachiHSakaiCSakaiN: Endovascular treatment of unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms: single-center experience with 400 cases and literature review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol37:679–6852016
SilvaMASeeAPDasenbrockHHPatelNJAziz-SultanMA: Vision outcomes in patients with paraclinoid aneurysms treated with clipping, coiling, or flow diversion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus42(6):E152017
SrinivasanVMKanPGermanwalaAVPelargosPBohnenAChoyW: Key perspectives on Woven EndoBridge device for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms, endoscopic endonasal clipping of intracranial aneurysms, retrosigmoid versus translabyrinthine approaches for acoustic neuromas, and impact of local intraoperative steroid administration on postoperative dysphagia following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Surg Neurol Int7 (Suppl 27):S720–S7242016
Tayebi MeybodiALittleASVigoVBenetAKakaizadaSLawtonMT: The pterygoclival ligament: a novel landmark for localization of the internal carotid artery during the endoscopic endonasal approach. J Neurosurg[epub ahead of print May 18 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172435]