Characteristics and career outcomes of Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation research fellowship recipients

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

The American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation (NREF) provides ongoing competitive research fellowships for residents and young investigators. The authors sought to determine the characteristics and career tracks of award recipients.

METHODS

The authors analyzed characteristics and academic productivity parameters of NREF resident and young investigator awardees in the United States and Canada from 1983 to 2017. Data were extracted from the NREF database and online resources (Web of Science, NIH reporter).

RESULTS

In total, 224 research grants were awarded to 31 women (14%) and 193 men (86%) from 1983 to 2017. Neuro-oncology (36%) was the most common research category. Sixty percent of awardees were in training and most resident award winners were in postgraduate year 5 (37%). Forty-nine percent of all awardees had an additional postgraduate degree (PhD 39%, Master’s 10%) with a significantly higher number of PhD recipients being from Canada in comparison to any US region (p = 0.024). The Northeastern and Southeastern United States were the regions with the highest and lowest numbers of award recipients, respectively. More than one-third (40%) of awardees came from institutions that have a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Research Education Grant (NINDS R25) for neurosurgical training. Awardees from NINDS R25–funded programs were significantly more likely to go on to receive funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (40.4% vs 26.1%; p = 0.024). The majority of recipients (72%) who were no longer in training pursued fellowships, with a significant likelihood that fellowship subspecialty correlated with NREF research category (p < 0.001). Seventy-nine percent of winners entered academic neurosurgery practice, with 18% obtaining the position of chair. The median h-index among NREF winners was 11. NIH funding was obtained by 71 awardees (32%) with 36 (18%) being a principal investigator on an R01 grant from the NIH Research Project Grant Program.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of AANS/NREF research award recipients enter academics as fellowship-trained neurosurgeons, with approximately one-third obtaining NIH funding. Analysis of this unique cohort allows for identification of characteristics of academic success.

ABBREVIATIONS AANS = American Association of Neurological Surgeons; NIH = National Institutes of Health; NINDS R25 = National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Research Education Grant; NREF = Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation; PI = principal investigator; R01 = grant from the NIH Research Project Grant Program.

Article Information

Correspondence Analiz Rodriguez: University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR. arodriguez@uams.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online February 8, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2018.10.JNS18859.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Distribution of NREF award winners by postgraduate year at the time of winning the award. Award recipients in postgraduate years 1–7 are residents; those in postgraduate year ≥ 8 are new investigators.

  • View in gallery

    Research category at time of award. Neuro-oncology, functional, and spine comprised 73% of the award categories.

  • View in gallery

    Relationship between mean publication number (upper) and h-index (lower) at the time of award and the number of awardees at the institution. *p < 0.05.

  • View in gallery

    Percentage of programs compared with percentage of winners per each US geographical region and Canada. There are statistically similar numbers of programs per region (p = 0.006); however, there are significantly fewer award winners from the Southeastern United States compared with other regions (p < 0.001).

References

1

Bobian MRShah NSvider PFHong RSShkoukani MAFolbe AJ: Does formal research training lead to academic success in otolaryngology? Laryngoscope 127:E15E212017

2

Choi BDDeLong MRDeLong DMFriedman AHSampson JH: Impact of PhD training on scholarship in a neurosurgical career. J Neurosurg 120:7307352014

3

Eloy JASvider PFSetzen MBaredes SFolbe AJ: Does receiving an American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts grant influence career path and scholarly impact among fellowship-trained rhinologists? Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 4:85902014

4

Flanigan PMJahangiri AGolubovsky JLKarnuta JMMay FJBerger MS: A cross-sectional study of neurosurgical department chairs in the United States. J Neurosurg 129:134213482018

5

Furuya HBrenner DRosser CJ: On the brink of extinction: the future of translational physician-scientists in the United States. J Transl Med 15:882017

6

Han JTEgbert MADodson TBSusarla SM: Is formal research training associated with academic success in oral and maxillofacial surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 76:27332018

7

Harding CVAkabas MHAndersen OS: History and outcomes of 50 years of physician-scientist training in medical scientist training programs. Acad Med 92:139013982017

8

Hassan BBernstam EHines OJSimeone DMWeber SMGeller DA: Career track of Society of University Surgeons Resident Research Award recipients. J Surg Res 185:92962013

9

Hegde VJohansen DPark HYZoller SDHamad CBernthal NM: The relationship between OREF grants and future NIH funding success. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:e872017

10

Kibbe MRDardik AVelazquez OCConte MS: The vascular surgeon-scientist: a 15-year report of the Society for Vascular Surgery Foundation/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–mentored Career Development Award Program. J Vasc Surg 61:105010572015

11

Lopez JAmeri ASusarla SMReddy SSoni ATong JW: Does formal research training lead to academic success in plastic surgery? A comprehensive analysis of U.S. academic plastic surgeons. J Surg Educ 73:4224282016

12

Mann MTendulkar ABirger NHoward CRatcliffe MB: National Institutes of Health funding for surgical research. Ann Surg 247:2172212008

13

Narahari AKCharles EJMehaffey JHHawkins RBSchubert SATribble CG: Cardiothoracic surgery training grants provide protected research time vital to the development of academic surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 155:205020562018

14

Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group: Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group Report 2014. (https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/reports/PSW_Report_ACD_06042014.pdf) [Accessed November 15 2018]

15

Sweeney WMCederna PSLosee JELee WPAKatz AJRubin JP: The Academic Scholar Award of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons: the first 20 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:438e444e2015

16

Valsangkar NPZimmers TAKim BJBlanton CJoshi MMBell TM: Determining the drivers of academic success in surgery: an analysis of 3,850 faculty. PLoS One 10:e01316782015

17

Vates GEKim DHDay AL: The neurosurgeon as clinician-scientist: the fundamentals. Clin Neurosurg 51:53582004

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 258 258 258
Full Text Views 2500 2500 2500
PDF Downloads 28 28 28
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar