If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
To and Jukes have performed a very valuable service to the neurosurgical community by undertaking an exhaustive analysis of the frequency and features of p values appearing in the abstracts of articles published in 4 high-impact neurosurgical journals between 1990 and 2017.19 Using a computer-executed search strategy, they show that the frequency of abstracts containing p values has increased by 0.86% per year over that 27-year interval (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61%–1.2%, p < 0.001), from 8.52% in 1990 to 34.0% in 2017. There has been a corresponding increase in the number of p values per
FrenchJAKraussGLSteinhoffBJSquillacoteDYangHKumarD: Evaluation of adjunctive perampanel in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures: results of randomized global phase III study 305. Epilepsia54:117–1252013
PageMJMcKenzieJEKirkhamJDwanKKramerSGreenS: Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev10:MR0000352014
SchmidtSFrankeJRauschmannMAdeltDBonsantoMMSolaS: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization. J Neurosurg Spine28:406–4152018
ShiloachMFrencherSKJrSteegerJERowellKSBartzokisKTomehMG: Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg210:6–162010