Assessing disability after head injury: improved use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale

Laura E. L. Pettigrew Department of Neurosurgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; and Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Laura E. L. Pettigrew in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 B.Sc.
,
J. T. Lindsay Wilson Department of Neurosurgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; and Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by J. T. Lindsay Wilson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 Ph.D.
, and
Graham M. Teasdale Department of Neurosurgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; and Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Graham M. Teasdale in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 M.B.B.S., M.R.C.P., F.R.C.S., F.R.C.P.
Page Range:
939–943
Volume/Issue:
Volume 89: Issue 6
DOI link:
https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.89.6.0939
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $525.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $624.00
Click here for subscription options

  • Purchase Now

    USD  $45.00

  • JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

    USD  $525.00

  • JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

    USD  $624.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $525.00
USD  $624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

Object. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is widely used to assess outcome after head injury, but is recognized as having a number of shortcomings that are highlighted and investigated in this study. The authors pursued two goals: 1) investigating the practicality of using a standard set of questions as part of a structured interview to assign GOS scores, and 2) studying the role of preinjury problems in confounding postinjury assessment of disability.

Methods. Several of the major limitations of the GOS appear to arise from the use of a format that encourages impressionistic ratings. In the present study the authors examined the use of a standard interview for assessing the GOS covering five areas of social disability. Ratings were made for 80 head-injured patients. The results show that the rating based on the GOS provides an assessment of disability that is more complete than that given by an alternative scale of functional disability (Disability Rating Scale [DRS]) and much more complete than an assessment of physical disability (Barthel Activities of Daily Living [ADL] index). A measure of preinjury dependency was made revealing that, within this sample, 20% of patients required supervision in basic ADL before their injury.

Conclusions. Assignment of GOS scores based on information obtained using a structured interview format provides a more comprehensive assessment of disability than using the DRS or the ADL index. There is a need to standardize attitudes about preinjury dependency in assessing disability after head injury.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Contributor Notes

Address reprint requests to: J. T. Lindsay Wilson, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, United Kingdom.
  • 1.

    Anderson SI, , Housley AM, & Jones PA, et al: Glasgow Outcome Scale: an inter-rater reliability study. Brain Inj 7:309–317, 1993 Anderson SI, Housley AM, Jones PA, et al: Glasgow Outcome Scale: an inter-rater reliability study. Brain Inj 7:309–317, 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Brooks N, , McKinlay W, & Symington C, et al: Return to work within the first seven years of severe head injury. Brain Inj 1:5–19, 1987 Brooks N, McKinlay W, Symington C, et al: Return to work within the first seven years of severe head injury. Brain Inj 1:5–19, 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Clifton GL, , Hayes RL, & Levin HS, et al: Outcome measures for clinical trials involving traumatically brain-injured patients: report of a conference. Neurosurgery 31:975–978, 1992 Clifton GL, Hayes RL, Levin HS, et al: Outcome measures for clinical trials involving traumatically brain-injured patients: report of a conference. Neurosurgery 31:975–978, 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Collin C, , Wade DT, & Davies S, et al: The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Studies 10:61–63, 1988 Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, et al: The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Studies 10:61–63, 1988

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Gouvier WD, , Blanton PD, & Kittle KS, et al: Reliability and validity of the Expanded Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Stover-Zieger Scale. Int J Clin Neuropsychol 8:1–2, 1986 Gouvier WD, Blanton PD, Kittle KS, et al: Reliability and validity of the Expanded Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Stover-Zieger Scale. Int J Clin Neuropsychol 8:1–2, 1986

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Grant I, & Alves W: Psychiatric and psychosocial disturbances in head injury, in Levin HS, , Grafman J, & Eisenberg HM (eds): Neurobehavioral Recovery from Head Injury. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987, pp 232–261 Grant I, Alves W: Psychiatric and psychosocial disturbances in head injury, in Levin HS, Grafman J, Eisenberg HM (eds): Neurobehavioral Recovery from Head Injury. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987, pp 232–261

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Hall K, , Cope DN, & Rappaport M: Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale: comparative usefulness in following recovery in traumatic head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66:35–37, 1985 Hall K, Cope DN, Rappaport M: Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale: comparative usefulness in following recovery in traumatic head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66:35–37, 1985

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Humphrey M, & Oddy M: Return to work after head injury: a review of post-war studies. Injury 12:107–114, 1980 Humphrey M, Oddy M: Return to work after head injury: a review of post-war studies. Injury 12:107–114, 1980

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Jennett B, & Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1:480–484, 1975 Jennett B, Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1:480–484, 1975

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Jennett B, , Snoek J, & Bond MR, et al: Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 44:285–293, 1981 Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, et al: Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 44:285–293, 1981

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Jennett B, & Teasdale G: Management of Head Injuries. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1981 Jennett B, Teasdale G: Management of Head Injuries. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1981

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Kreutzer JS, , Marwitz JH, & Witol AD: Interrelationships between crime, substance abuse, and aggressive behaviours among persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 9:757–768, 1995 Kreutzer JS, Marwitz JH, Witol AD: Interrelationships between crime, substance abuse, and aggressive behaviours among persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 9:757–768, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Kreutzer JS, , Wehman PH, & Harris JA, et al: Substance abuse and crime patterns among persons with traumatic brain injury referred for supported employment. Brain Inj 5:177–187, 1991 Kreutzer JS, Wehman PH, Harris JA, et al: Substance abuse and crime patterns among persons with traumatic brain injury referred for supported employment. Brain Inj 5:177–187, 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Lezak MD: Relationships between personality disorders, social disturbances, and physical disability following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2:57–69, 1987 Lezak MD: Relationships between personality disorders, social disturbances, and physical disability following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2:57–69, 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Maas AIR, , Braakman R, & Schouten HJA, et al: Agreement between physicians on assessment of outcome following severe head injury. J Neurosurg 58:321–325, 1983 Maas AIR, Braakman R, Schouten HJA, et al: Agreement between physicians on assessment of outcome following severe head injury. J Neurosurg 58:321–325, 1983

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Mahoney FI, & Barthel DW: Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland Med J 14:61–65, 1965 Mahoney FI, Barthel DW: Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland Med J 14:61–65, 1965

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Oddy M, & Humphrey M: Social recovery during the year following severe head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 43:798–802, 1980 Oddy M, Humphrey M: Social recovery during the year following severe head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 43:798–802, 1980

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Rappaport M, , Hall KM, & Hopkins K, et al: Disability Rating Scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 63:118–123, 1982 Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, et al: Disability Rating Scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 63:118–123, 1982

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Roa N, & Kilgore KM: Predicting return to work in traumatic brain injury using assessment scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73:911–916, 1992 Roa N, Kilgore KM: Predicting return to work in traumatic brain injury using assessment scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73:911–916, 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Stambrook M, , Moore AD, & Peters LC, et al: Effects of mild, moderate and severe closed head injury on long-term vocational status. Brain Inj 4:183–190, 1990 Stambrook M, Moore AD, Peters LC, et al: Effects of mild, moderate and severe closed head injury on long-term vocational status. Brain Inj 4:183–190, 1990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Teasdale G, & Jennett B: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84, 1974 Teasdale G, Jennett B: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84, 1974

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Vogenthaler DR: An overview of head injury: its consequences and rehabilitation. Brain Inj 1:113–127, 1987 Vogenthaler DR: An overview of head injury: its consequences and rehabilitation. Brain Inj 1:113–127, 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Wade DT, & Collin C: The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 10:64–67, 1988 Wade DT, Collin C: The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 10:64–67, 1988

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Wilson JTL, , Pettigrew LEL, & Teasdale GM: Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 15:573–584, 1998 Wilson JTL, Pettigrew LEL, Teasdale GM: Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 15:573–584, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1370 405 14
Full Text Views 234 4 0
PDF Downloads 153 9 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0