External validation of the Lawton brainstem cavernous malformation grading system in a cohort of 277 microsurgical patients

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona; and
  • | 2 Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

The brainstem cavernous malformation (BSCM) grading system predicts neurological outcomes associated with microsurgical resection and assists neurosurgeons in selecting patients for treatment. The predictive accuracy of the BSCM grading system should be validated in a large cohort from high-volume centers to generalize its use.

METHODS

An external validation cohort comprised patients with a BSCM resected by the senior author (M.T.L.) since the publication of the BSCM grading system and those resected by another neurosurgeon (R.F.S.) over a 16-year period. Size, crossing the axial midpoint, the presence of a developmental venous anomaly, patient age, and timing of last hemorrhage were used to assign BSCM grades from 0 to VII. Poor neurological outcomes were recorded as modified Rankin Scale scores > 2 at last follow-up examination.

RESULTS

A total of 277 patients were included in the study. The average BSCM grade was 3.9, and the majority of BSCMs (181 patients, 65%) were intermediate grade (grades III–V). Outcomes were predicted by BSCM grade, with good outcomes observed in 47 of 54 patients (87%) with low-grade BSCMs, in 135 of 181 patients (75%) with intermediate-grade BSCMs, and in 21 of 42 patients (50%) with high-grade BSCMs. Conversely, proportions of patients with neurological deterioration increased with increasing BSCM grade, with worsening observed in 2 of 54 patients (4%) with low-grade BSCMs, in 29 of 181 patients (16%) with intermediate-grade BSCMs, and in 17 of 42 patients (40%) with high-grade BSCMs. In the chi-square analysis, high-grade BSCMs were associated with increased odds of neurological worsening compared to low- and intermediate-grade BSCMs (OR 5.0, 95% CI 2.4–10.4; p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated acceptable discrimination for predicting unfavorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score > 2) with an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% CI 0.68–0.80; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study validates the BSCM grading system in a large cohort of patients from two high-volume surgeons. BSCM grade predicted neurological outcomes with accuracy comparable to that of other grading systems in widespread use. The BSCM grading system establishes categories of low-, intermediate-, and high-grade BSCMs and a boundary or cutoff for surgery at BSCM grade V. BSCM grading guides the analysis of a particular patient’s condition, but treatment recommendations must be individualized, and neurosurgeons must calibrate BSCM grading to their own outcome results, unique abilities, and practices.

ABBREVIATIONS

AUROC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; BSCM = brainstem cavernous malformation; DVA = developmental venous anomaly; mRS = modified Rankin Scale.

Illustration from Serrato-Avila (pp 1410–1423). Copyright Johns Hopkins University, Art as Applied to Medicine. Published with permission.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Zaidi HA, Mooney MA, Levitt MR, et al. Impact of timing of intervention among 397 consecutively treated brainstem cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2017;81(4):620626.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Wang CC, Liu A, Zhang JT, et al. Surgical management of brain-stem cavernous malformations: report of 137 cases. Surg Neurol. 2003;59(6):444454.

  • 3

    Terao H, Hori T, Matsutani M, Okeda R. Detection of cryptic vascular malformations by computerized tomography. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 1979;51(4):546551.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Steňo J, Bízik I, Steňová J, Timárová G. Subtemporal transtentorial resection of cavernous malformations involving the pyramidal tract in the upper pons and mesencephalon. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011;153(10):19551962.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Scott BB, Seeger JF, Schneider RC. Successful evacuation of a pontine hematoma secondary to rupture of a pathologically diagnosed “cryptic” vascular malformation. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1973;39(1):104108.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Ramina R, Mattei TA, de Aguiar PH, et al. Surgical management of brainstem cavernous malformations. Neurol Sci. 2011;32(6):10131028.

  • 7

    Porter RW, Detwiler PW, Spetzler RF, et al. Cavernous malformations of the brainstem: experience with 100 patients. J Neurosurg. 1999;90(1):5058.

  • 8

    Pandey P, Westbroek EM, Gooderham PA, Steinberg GK. Cavernous malformation of brainstem, thalamus, and basal ganglia: a series of 176 patients. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(4):573589.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Ohue S, Fukushima T, Kumon Y, et al. Surgical management of brainstem cavernomas: selection of approaches and microsurgical techniques. Neurosurg Rev. 2010;33(3):315324.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Nathal E, Patiño-Rodriguez HM, Arauz A, et al. Risk factors for unfavorable outcomes in surgically treated brainstem cavernous malformations. World Neurosurg. 2018;111:e478e484.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Menon G, Gopalakrishnan CV, Rao BR, et al. A single institution series of cavernomas of the brainstem. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(9):12101214.

  • 12

    Li H, Ju Y, Cai BW, et al. Experience of microsurgical treatment of brainstem cavernomas: report of 37 cases. Neurol India. 2009;57(3):269273.

  • 13

    Kivelev J, Laakso A, Niemelä M, Hernesniemi J. A proposed grading system of brain and spinal cavernomas. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(4):807814.

  • 14

    Ichinose T, Goto T, Morisako H, et al. Microroll retractor for surgical resection of brainstem cavernomas. World Neurosurg. 2010;73(5):520522.

  • 15

    Huang AP, Chen JS, Yang CC, et al. Brain stem cavernous malformations. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(1):7479.

  • 16

    Hauck EF, Barnett SL, White JA, Samson D. Symptomatic brainstem cavernomas. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(1):6171.

  • 17

    Gross BA, Batjer HH, Awad IA, et al. Brainstem cavernous malformations: 1390 surgical cases from the literature. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(1-2):8993.

  • 18

    Gross BA, Batjer HH, Awad IA, Bendok BR. Brainstem cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(5):E805E818.

  • 19

    Georgieva VB, Krastev ED. Surgical treatment of brainstem cavernous malformation with concomitant developmental venous anomaly. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019;14(2):557560.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    François P, Ben Ismail M, Hamel O, et al. Anterior transpetrosal and subtemporal transtentorial approaches for pontine cavernomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152(8):13211329.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Ferroli P, Sinisi M, Franzini A, et al. Brainstem cavernomas: long-term results of microsurgical resection in 52 patients. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(6):12031214.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Dukatz T, Sarnthein J, Sitter H, et al. Quality of life after brainstem cavernoma surgery in 71 patients. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(3):689695.

  • 23

    Ding D, Starke RM, Crowley RW, Liu KC. Surgical approaches for symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformations of the thalamus and brainstem. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2017;19(1):1935.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Consales A, Piatelli G, Ravegnani M, et al. Treatment and outcome of children with cerebral cavernomas: a survey on 32 patients. Neurol Sci. 2010;31(2):117123.

  • 25

    Chen LH, Zhang HT, Chen L, et al. Minimally invasive resection of brainstem cavernous malformations: surgical approaches and clinical experiences with 38 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;116:7279.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Cenzato M, Stefini R, Ambrosi C, Giovanelli M. Post-operative remnants of brainstem cavernomas: incidence, risk factors and management. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008;150(9):879887.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Cannizzaro D, Sabatino G, Mancarella C, et al. Management and surgical approaches of brainstem cavernous malformations: our experience and literature review. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019;14(1):131139.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Bruneau M, Bijlenga P, Reverdin A, et al. Early surgery for brainstem cavernomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;148(4):405414.

  • 29

    Bhardwaj RD, Auguste KI, Kulkarni AV, et al. Management of pediatric brainstem cavernous malformations: experience over 20 years at the hospital for sick children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;4(5):458464.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Abla AA, Turner JD, Mitha AP, et al. Surgical approaches to brainstem cavernous malformations. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29(3):E8.

  • 31

    Abla AA, Lekovic GP, Garrett M, et al. Cavernous malformations of the brainstem presenting in childhood: surgical experience in 40 patients. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(6):15891599.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Garcia RM, Ivan ME, Lawton MT. Brainstem cavernous malformations: surgical results in 104 patients and a proposed grading system to predict neurological outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(3):265278.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Lashkarivand A, Ringstad G, Eide PK. Surgery for brainstem cavernous malformations: association between preoperative grade and postoperative quality of life. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;18(6):590598.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Santos AN, Rauschenbach L, Darkwah Oppong M, et al. Assessment and validation of proposed classification tools for brainstem cavernous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2021;135(2):410416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):W173.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Heus P, Damen JAAG, Pajouheshnia R, et al. Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):120.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Grant SW, Collins GS, Nashef SAM. Statistical primer: developing and validating a risk prediction model. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;54(2):203208.

  • 38

    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley;2000.

  • 39

    Garcia RM, Oh T, Cole TS, et al. Recurrent brainstem cavernous malformations following primary resection: blind spots, fine lines, and the right-angle method. J Neurosurg. 2021;135(3):671682.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Spetzler RF, Martin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1986;65(4):476483.

  • 41

    Lawton MT, Kim H, McCulloch CE, et al. A supplementary grading scale for selecting patients with brain arteriovenous malformations for surgery. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(4):702713.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Kim H, Abla AA, Nelson J, et al. Validation of the supplemented Spetzler-Martin grading system for brain arteriovenous malformations in a multicenter cohort of 1009 surgical patients. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(1):2533.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Hoffman JE, Ryan M, Wittenberg B, et al. Successful treatment of hemorrhagic brainstem cavernous malformation with hematoma evacuation and postoperative propranolol. Childs Nerv Syst. 2020;36(9):21092112.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Zabramski JM, Kalani MYS, Filippidis AS, Spetzler RF. Propranolol treatment of cavernous malformations with symptomatic hemorrhage. World Neurosurg. 2016;88:631639.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 347 347 347
Full Text Views 187 187 187
PDF Downloads 295 295 295
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0