Editorial. Craniopharyngioma classification

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; and
  • | 2 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

Illustration from Fan et al. (pp 1298–1309). Copyright Jun Fan. Published with permission.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Fan J, Liu Y, Pan J, et al. Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial surgery for primary resection of craniopharyngiomas based on a new QST classification system: a comparative series of 315 patients. J Neurosurg. Published onlin March 5, 2020. doi: 10.3171/2020.7.JNS20257

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Yaşargil MG, Curcic M, Kis M, et al. Total removal of craniopharyngiomas. Approaches and long-term results in 144 patients. J Neurosurg. 1990;73(1):311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Rhoton AL Jr. The sellar region. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(4 Suppl):S335S374.

  • 4

    Prevedello DM, Doglietto F, Jane JA, et al. History of endoscopic skull base surgery: its evolution and current reality. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(1):206213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(10):18821886.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Cavallo LM, Frank G, Cappabianca P, et al. The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(1):100113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, et al. Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg. 2008;108(4):715728.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Jamshidi AO, Beer-Furlan A, Prevedello DM, et al. A modern series of subdiaphragmatic craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg. 2018;131(2):526531.

  • 9

    Olsson DS, Andersson E, Bryngelsson I-L, et al. Excess mortality and morbidity in patients with craniopharyngioma, especially in patients with childhood onset: a population-based study in Sweden. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(2):467474.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Schoenfeld A, Pekmezci M, Barnes MJ, et al. The superiority of conservative resection and adjuvant radiation for craniopharyngiomas. J Neurooncol. 2012;108(1):133139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hayashi Y, Sasagawa Y, Oishi M, et al. Radiological and endocrinological evaluations with grading of hypothalamic perifocal edema caused by craniopharyngiomas. Pituitary. 2019;22(2):146155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Juratli TA, Jones PS, Wang N, et al. Targeted treatment of papillary craniopharyngiomas harboring BRAF V600E mutations. Cancer. 2019;125(17):29102914.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1

    Pan J, Qi S, Liu Y, et al. Growth patterns of craniopharyngiomas: clinical analysis of 226 patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(4):418433.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Bao Y, Pan J, Qi ST, et al. Origin of craniopharyngiomas: implications for growth pattern, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of tumor recurrence. J Neurosurg. 2016;125(1):2432.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Liu Y, Qi ST, Wang CH, et al. Pathological relationship between adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma and adjacent structures based on QST classification. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2018;77(11):10171023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Morisako H, Goto T, Goto H, et al. Aggressive surgery based on an anatomical subclassification of craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;41(6):E10.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Hoffman HJ, De Silva M, Humphreys RP, et al. Aggressive surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in children. J Neurosurg. 1992;76(1):4752.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, et al. Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg. 2008;108(4):715728.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Samii M, Bini W.Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1991;52(1):1723.

  • 8

    Steno J, Malácek M, Bízik I. Tumor-third ventricular relationships in supradiaphragmatic craniopharyngiomas: correlation of morphological, magnetic resonance imaging, and operative findings. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(5):10511060.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Wang KC, Kim SK, Choe G, et al. Growth patterns of craniopharyngioma in children: role of the diaphragm sellae and its surgical implication. Surg Neurol. 2002;57(1):2533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Songtao Q, Yuntao L, Jun P, et al. Membranous layers of the pituitary gland: histological anatomic study and related clinical issues. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(3 Suppl 1):ONS1ONS10.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Song-tao Q, Xi-an Z, Hao L, et al. The arachnoid sleeve enveloping the pituitary stalk: anatomical and histologic study. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(3):585589.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Lu Y-T, Qi S-T, Xu J-M, et al. A membranous structure separating the adenohypophysis and neurohypophysis: an anatomical study and its clinical application for craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;15(6):630637.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Qi S, Liu Y, Wang C, et al. Membrane structures between craniopharyngioma and the third ventricle floor based on the QST classification and its significance: a pathological study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2020;79(9):966974.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Qi S, Pan J, Lu Y, et al. The impact of the site of origin and rate of tumour growth on clinical outcome in children with craniopharyngiomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012;76(1):103110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Qi S, Peng J, Pan J, et al. Growth and weight of children with craniopharyngiomas based on the tumour location and growth pattern. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(12):17021708.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Li D, Pan J, Peng J, et al. Risk score for the prediction of severe obesity in pediatric craniopharyngiomas: relative to tumor origin. Pediatr Res. 2018;83(3):645654.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Qi S.Understanding treatment options in craniopharyngioma better. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):28.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 679 679 505
Full Text Views 206 206 147
PDF Downloads 262 262 186
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0