Increased complication and mortality among non-index hospital readmissions after brain tumor resection is associated with low-volume readmitting hospitals

View More View Less
  • 1 Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles;
  • 2 Departments of Neurological Surgery and
  • 4 Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; and
  • 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Fragmentation of care following craniotomy for tumor resection is increasingly common with the regionalization of neurosurgery. Hospital readmission to a hospital (non-index) other than the one from which patients received their original care (index) has been associated with increases in both morbidity and mortality for cancer patients. The impact of non-index readmission after surgical management of brain tumors has not previously been evaluated. The authors set out to determine rates of non-index readmission following craniotomy for tumor resection and evaluated outcomes following index and non-index readmissions.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of data from cases involving resection of a primary brain tumor were conducted using data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) for 2010–2014. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent association of patient and hospital factors with readmission to an index versus non-index hospital. Further analysis evaluated association of non-index versus index hospital readmission with mortality and major complications during readmission. Effects of readmission hospital procedure volume on mortality and morbidity were evaluated in post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

In a total of 17,459 unplanned readmissions, 84.4% patients were readmitted to index hospitals and 15.6% to non-index hospitals. Patient factors associated with increased likelihood of non-index readmission included older age (75+: OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.19–1.75), elective index admission (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08–1.30), increased Elixhauser comorbidity score ≥2 (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01–1.37), and malignant tumor diagnosis (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.19–1.45) (all p < 0.04). Readmission to a non-index facility was associated with a 28% increase in major complications (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.14–1.43, p < 0.001) and 21% increase in mortality (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02–1.44, p = 0.032) in initial analysis. Following a second multivariable logistic regression analysis including the readmitting hospital characteristics, low procedure volume of a readmitting facility was significantly associated with non-index readmission (p < 0.001). Readmission to a lower-procedure-volume facility was associated with a 46%–75% increase in mortality (OR 1.46–1.75, p < 0.005) and a 21%–35% increase in major complications (OR 1.21–1.34, p < 0.005). Following adjustment for volume at a readmitting facility, admission to a non-index facility was no longer associated with mortality (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.71–1.14, p = 0.378) or major complications (OR 1.09, CI 0.94–1.26, p = 0.248).

CONCLUSIONS

Of patient readmissions following brain tumor resection, 15.6% occur at a non-index facility. Low procedure volume is a confounder for non-index analysis and is associated with an increased likelihood of major complications and mortality, as compared to readmission to high-procedure-volume hospitals. Further studies should evaluate interventions targeting factors associated with unplanned readmission.

ABBREVIATIONS APR-DRG = All Patient Refined DRG; DRG = Diagnosis Related Group; HCUP = Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project; ICD-9-CM = International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; NRD = Nationwide Readmissions Database.

Supplementary Materials

    • pdf Table S1 (PDF 395 KB)

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Casey A. Jarvis: Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. cajarvis@usc.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online October 4, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.6.JNS183469.

Disclosures Dr. Mack reports direct stock ownership in Rebound Therapeutics, Cerebrotech, Endostream, and Viseon and a consultant relationship with Medtronic, Penumbra, Stream Biomedical, Rebound Therapeutics, The Stroke Project, and Viseon.

  • 1

    Akl EA, Kahale LA, Agoritsas T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Busse JW, Carrasco-Labra A, : Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches. Syst Rev 4:98, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Alkhenizan A, Shaw C: Impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Saudi Med 31:407416, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Babadjouni R, Wen T, Donoho DA, Buchanan IA, Cen SY, Friedman RA, : Increased hospital surgical volume reduces rate of 30- and 90-day readmission after acoustic neuroma surgery. Neurosurgery 84:726732, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Beal EW, Bagante F, Paredes A, Chen Q, Akgul O, Merath K, : Index versus non-index readmission after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: where do patients go to be readmitted? J Gastrointest Surg 23:702711, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Benbassat J, Taragin M: Hospital readmissions as a measure of quality of health care: advantages and limitations. Arch Intern Med 160:10741081, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Burke RE, Jones CD, Hosokawa P, Glorioso TJ, Coleman EA, Ginde AA: Influence of nonindex hospital readmission on length of stay and mortality. Med Care 56:8590, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Chappidi MR, Kates M, Stimson CJ, Bivalacqua TJ, Pierorazio PM: Quantifying nonindex hospital readmissions and care fragmentation after major urological oncology surgeries in a nationally representative sample. J Urol 197:235240, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Chappidi MR, Kates M, Stimson CJ, Johnson MH, Pierorazio PM, Bivalacqua TJ: Causes, timing, hospital costs and perioperative outcomes of index vs nonindex hospital readmissions after radical cystectomy: implications for regionalization of care. J Urol 197:296301, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Chhabra KR, Dimick JB: Strategies for improving surgical care: when is regionalization the right choice? JAMA Surg 151:10011002, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Das P, Guillaume DJ: Chapter 17 - Improving outcomes with subspecialization and regionalization, in Guillaume DJ, Hunt MA (eds): Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery. London: Academic Press, 2018, pp 225236

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Dasenbrock HH, Yan SC, Smith TR, Valdes PA, Gormley WB, Claus EB, : Readmission after craniotomy for tumor: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Neurosurgery 80:551562, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Davies JM, Ozpinar A, Lawton MT: Volume-outcome relationships in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 26:207218, viii, 2015

  • 13

    Dickinson H, Carico C, Nuño M, Mukherjee D, Ortega A, Black KL, : Unplanned readmissions and survival following brain tumor surgery. J Neurosurg 122:6168, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Donoho DA, Wen T, Babadjouni RM, Schwartzman W, Buchanan IA, Cen SY, : Predictors of 30- and 90-day readmission following craniotomy for malignant brain tumors: analysis of nationwide data. J Neurooncol 136:8794, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Gaynor M, Seider H, Vogt W: The volume–outcome effect, scale economies, and learning by doing. Am Econ Rev 95:243247, 2005

  • 16

    Glebova NO, Hicks CW, Taylor R, Tosoian JJ, Orion KC, Arnaoutakis KD, : Readmissions after complex aneurysm repair are frequent, costly, and primarily at nonindex hospitals. J Vasc Surg 60:14291437, 2014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Graboyes EM, Kallogjeri D, Saeed MJ, Olsen MA, Nussenbaum B: Postoperative care fragmentation and thirty-day unplanned readmissions after head and neck cancer surgery. Laryngoscope 127:868874, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Hewitt M, Petitti D (eds): Interpreting the Volume–Outcome Relationship in the Context of Cancer Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2001 (https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.libproxy2.usc.edu/books/NBK223575/) [Accessed July 29, 2019].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Ihse I: The volume-outcome relationship in cancer surgery: a hard sell. Ann Surg 238:777781, 2003

  • 20

    Kelley KA, Young JI, Bassale S, Herzig DO, Martindale RG, Sheppard BC, : Travel distance influences readmissions in colorectal cancer patients—what the primary operative team needs to know. J Surg Res 227:220227, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Khwaja HA, Syed H, Cranston DW: Coding errors: a comparative analysis of hospital and prospectively collected departmental data. BJU Int 89:178180, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Kim W, Wolff S, Ho V: Measuring the volume-outcome relation for complex hospital surgery. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 14:453464, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Kwak SK, Kim JH: Statistical data preparation: management of missing values and outliers. Korean J Anesthesiol 70:407411, 2017

  • 24

    Lonjaret L, Guyonnet M, Berard E, Vironneau M, Peres F, Sacrista S, : Postoperative complications after craniotomy for brain tumor surgery. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 36:213218, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Lopez Ramos C, Brandel MG, Steinberg JA, Wali AR, Rennert RC, Santiago-Dieppa DR, : The impact of traveling distance and hospital volume on post-surgical outcomes for patients with glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 141:159166, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J, Liu M, Blanda R, Kromer C, : CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008–2012. Neuro Oncol 17 (Suppl 4):iv1iv62, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Pace A, Di Lorenzo C, Capon A, Villani V, Benincasa D, Guariglia L, : Quality of care and rehospitalization rate in the last stage of disease in brain tumor patients assisted at home: a cost effectiveness study. J Palliat Med 15:225227, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Pereira Gray DJ, Sidaway-Lee K, White E, Thorne A, Evans PH: Continuity of care with doctors—a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality. BMJ Open 8:e021161, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Ramakrishna R, Hsu WC, Mao J, Sedrakyan A: Surgeon annual and cumulative volumes predict early postoperative outcomes after brain tumor resection. World Neurosurg 114:e254e266, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Rinaldo L, Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA: Transfer to high-volume centers associated with reduced mortality after endovascular treatment of acute stroke. Stroke 48:13161321, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Sathornsumetee S, Rich JN: New approaches to primary brain tumor treatment. Anticancer Drugs 17:10031016, 2006

  • 32

    Semins MJ, Trock BJ, Matlaga BR: Validity of administrative coding in identifying patients with upper urinary tract calculi. J Urol 184:190192, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Senders JT, Goldhaber NH, Cote DJ, Muskens IS, Dawood HY, De Vos FYFL, : Venous thromboembolism and intracranial hemorrhage after craniotomy for primary malignant brain tumors: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. J Neurooncol 136:135145, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Senders JT, Muskens IS, Cote DJ, Goldhaber NH, Dawood HY, Gormley WB, : Thirty-day outcomes after craniotomy for primary malignant brain tumors: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Neurosurgery 83:12491259, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Smith AB, Meyer AM, Meng K, Nielsen ME, Pruthi R, Wallen E, : The relationship of travel distance with cystectomy access and outcomes. Urol Oncol 36:308.e1308.e9, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Song K, Amatya B, Voutier C, Khan F: Advance care planning in patients with primary malignant brain tumors: a systematic review. Front Oncol 6:223, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Southern DA, Roberts B, Edwards A, Dean S, Norton P, Svenson LW, : Validity of administrative data claim-based methods for identifying individuals with diabetes at a population level. Can J Public Health 101:6164, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Tamariz L, Harkins T, Nair V: A systematic review of validated methods for identifying ventricular arrhythmias using administrative and claims data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 21 (Suppl 1):148153, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Telem DA, Yang J, Altieri M, Patterson W, Peoples B, Chen H, : Rates and risk factors for unplanned emergency department utilization and hospital readmission following bariatric surgery. Ann Surg 263:956960, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Weber SM, Greenberg CC: Medicare Hospital Readmission Reduction Program: what is the effect on surgery? Surgery 156:10661068, 2014

  • 41

    Woodworth GF, Baird CJ, Garces-Ambrossi G, Tonascia J, Tamargo RJ: Inaccuracy of the administrative database: comparative analysis of two databases for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 65:251257, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Zafar SN, Shah AA, Channa H, Raoof M, Wilson L, Wasif N: Comparison of rates and outcomes of readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 153:719727, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Zheng C, Habermann EB, Shara NM, Langan RC, Hong Y, Johnson LB, : Fragmentation of care after surgical discharge: non-index readmission after major cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg 222:780789, 789.e1–789.e2, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 149 149 84
Full Text Views 68 68 54
PDF Downloads 45 45 38
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0