Primary versus postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly: a multicenter matched cohort study

Nasser MohammedDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Nasser Mohammed in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, MCh
,
Dale DingDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Dale Ding in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Yi-Chieh HungDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Yi-Chieh Hung in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Zhiyuan XuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Zhiyuan Xu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Cheng-Chia LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;

Search for other papers by Cheng-Chia Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Hideyuki KanoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;

Search for other papers by Hideyuki Kano in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Roberto Martínez-ÁlvarezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ruber Internacional Hospital, Madrid, Spain;

Search for other papers by Roberto Martínez-Álvarez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Nuria Martínez-MorenoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ruber Internacional Hospital, Madrid, Spain;

Search for other papers by Nuria Martínez-Moreno in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
David MathieuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada; and

Search for other papers by David Mathieu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Mikulas Kosak3rd Department of Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Search for other papers by Mikulas Kosak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Christopher P. CifarelliDepartment of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia;

Search for other papers by Christopher P. Cifarelli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Gennadiy A. KatsevmanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia;

Search for other papers by Gennadiy A. Katsevman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
L. Dade LunsfordDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;

Search for other papers by L. Dade Lunsford in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Mary Lee VanceDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Mary Lee Vance in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
, and
Jason P. SheehanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Jason P. Sheehan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
View More View Less
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $525.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $624.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $525.00
USD  $624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

The role of primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with medically refractory acromegaly who are not operative candidates or who refuse resection is poorly understood. The aim of this multicenter, matched cohort study was to compare the outcomes of primary versus postoperative SRS for acromegaly.

METHODS

The authors reviewed an International Radiosurgery Research Foundation database of 398 patients with acromegaly who underwent SRS and categorized them into primary or postoperative cohorts. Patients in the primary SRS cohort were matched, in a 1:2 ratio, to those in the postoperative SRS cohort, and the outcomes of the 2 matched cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 78 patients (median follow-up 66.4 months), including 26 and 52 in the matched primary and postoperative SRS cohorts, respectively. In the primary SRS cohort, the actuarial endocrine remission rates at 2 and 5 years were 20% and 42%, respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model showed that a lower pre-SRS insulin-like growth factor–1 level was predictive of initial endocrine remission (p = 0.03), whereas a lower SRS margin dose was predictive of biochemical recurrence after initial remission (p = 0.01). There were no differences in the rates of radiological tumor control (p = 0.34), initial endocrine remission (p = 0.23), biochemical recurrence after initial remission (p = 0.33), recurrence-free survival (p = 0.32), or hypopituitarism (p = 0.67) between the 2 matched cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary SRS has a reasonable benefit-to-risk profile for patients with acromegaly in whom resection is not possible, and it has similar outcomes to endocrinologically comparable patients who undergo postoperative SRS. SRS with medical therapy in the latent period can be used as an alternative to surgery in selected patients who cannot or do not wish to undergo resection.

ABBREVIATIONS

ARE = adverse radiation effects; GH = growth hormone; HR = hazard ratio; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor–1; IRRF = International Radiosurgery Research Foundation; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery.
  • Collapse
  • Expand

Illustration from Ivan et al. (pp 1517–1528). Copyright Kenneth Probst. Published with permission.

  • 1

    Alexopoulou O, Bex M, Abs R, T’Sjoen G, Velkeniers B, Maiter D: Divergence between growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I concentrations in the follow-up of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:13241330, 2008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Attanasio R, Epaminonda P, Motti E, Giugni E, Ventrella L, Cozzi R, et al.: Gamma-knife radiosurgery in acromegaly: a 4-year follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:31053112, 2003

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Austin PC: An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 46:399424, 2011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Castinetti F, Taieb D, Kuhn JM, Chanson P, Tamura M, Jaquet P, et al.: Outcome of gamma knife radiosurgery in 82 patients with acromegaly: correlation with initial hypersecretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:44834488, 2005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Didoni G, Grottol S, Gasco V, Battistini M, Ferone D, Giusti M, et al.: Cost-of-illness study in acromegalic patients in Italy. J Endocrinol Invest 27:10341039, 2004

  • 6

    Ding D, Mehta GU, Patibandla MR, Lee CC, Liscak R, Kano H, et al.: Stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly: an international multicenter retrospective cohort study. Neurosurgery 84:717725, 2019

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Freda PU, Post KD, Powell JS, Wardlaw SL: Evaluation of disease status with sensitive measures of growth hormone secretion in 60 postoperative patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:38083816, 1998

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Holdaway IM, Rajasoorya RC, Gamble GD: Factors influencing mortality in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:667674, 2004

  • 9

    Katznelson L, Laws ER Jr, Melmed S, Molitch ME, Murad MH, Utz A, et al.: Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:39333951, 2014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kim SH, Huh R, Chang JW, Park YG, Chung SS: Gamma Knife radiosurgery for functioning pituitary adenomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 72 (Suppl 1):101110, 1999

  • 11

    Landolt AM, Haller D, Lomax N, Scheib S, Schubiger O, Siegfried J, et al.: Octreotide may act as a radioprotective agent in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:12871289, 2000

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Laws ER, Sheehan JP, Sheehan JM, Jagnathan J, Jane JA Jr, Oskouian R: Stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: a review of the literature. J Neurooncol 69:257272, 2004

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Lunt M: Selecting an appropriate caliper can be essential for achieving good balance with propensity score matching. Am J Epidemiol 179:226235, 2014

  • 14

    Moore DJ, Adi Y, Connock MJ, Bayliss S: Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly: a systematic review and economic evaluation. BMC Endocr Disord 9:20, 2009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Pollock BE, Jacob JT, Brown PD, Nippoldt TB: Radiosurgery of growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: factors associated with biochemical remission. J Neurosurg 106:833838, 2007

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Pomeraniec IJ, Kano H, Xu Z, Nguyen B, Siddiqui ZA, Silva D, et al.: Early versus late Gamma Knife radiosurgery following transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas: a multicenter matched-cohort study. J Neurosurg 129:648657, 2018

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Sheehan JP, Pouratian N, Steiner L, Laws ER, Vance ML: Gamma Knife surgery for pituitary adenomas: factors related to radiological and endocrine outcomes. J Neurosurg 114:303309, 2011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Snell JW, Sheehan J, Stroila M, Steiner L: Assessment of imaging studies used with radiosurgery: a volumetric algorithm and an estimation of its error. Technical note. J Neurosurg 104:157162, 2006

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Thorén M, Rähn T, Guo WY, Werner S: Stereotactic radiosurgery with the cobalt-60 gamma unit in the treatment of growth hormone-producing pituitary tumors. Neurosurgery 29:663668, 1991

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Zhang N, Pan L, Wang EM, Dai JZ, Wang BJ, Cai PW: Radiosurgery for growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 93 (Suppl 3):69, 2000

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1074 490 16
Full Text Views 131 13 2
PDF Downloads 156 17 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0