The goal of this study was to compare outcomes of carotid endarterectomy performed by neurological, general, and vascular surgeons.
The authors identified 80,475 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy between 2006 and 2015 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a prospectively collected, national clinical database with established reproducibility and validity. Nine hundred forty-three patients were operated on by a neurosurgeon; 75,649 by a vascular surgeon; and 3734 by a general surgeon. Preoperative and intraoperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes were stratified by the surgeon’s primary specialty. Using propensity scores, comprising pre- and intraoperative characteristics as well as procedure and diagnostic codes, the authors matched 203 neurosurgery (NS) patients to 203 vascular surgery (VS) patients and 203 NS patients to 203 general surgery (GS) patients. No pre- or intraoperative factors were significantly different between specialties in the matched sample. Regular logistic regression and conditional logistic regression were used to predict postoperative complications in the full sample and in the matched sample.
In the complete population sample, NS patients, when compared to patients of general and vascular surgeons, were less likely to be admitted from home and more likely to have carotid artery occlusion or stenosis with cerebral infarction, to be a current smoker, to have had recent chemo- or radiotherapy, to have surgery under general anesthesia, to undergo multiple procedures, and to have longer surgery times. In unadjusted analyses, NS patients were more likely to experience major complications (NS vs VS: odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6; NS vs GS: odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.0–1.7); minor complications (NS vs VS: odds ratio 2.9, 95% CI 2.0–4.1; NS vs GS: odds ratio 2.7, 95% CI 1.7–4.2); intra- or postoperative transfusions (NS vs VS: odds ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.4–1.9; NS vs GS: odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.6–2.3); prolonged hospitalization (NS vs VS: odds ratio 3.0, 95% CI 2.6–3.5; NS vs GS: odds ratio 2.6, 95% CI 2.2–3.0); and discharge to skilled care facilities (NS vs VS: odds ratio 2.8, 95% CI 2.3–3.4; NS vs GS: odds ratio 3.1, 95% CI 2.4–4.1). In adjusted, propensity-matched analyses, however, patients’ outcome with carotid endarterectomy performed by NS was comparable with those completed by GS and VS.
Patients who undergo carotid endarterectomy performed by a neurosurgeon tend to have a greater preoperative disease burden than do those treated by a general or vascular surgeon, which contributes significantly to more morbid postoperative courses. In patients matched carefully on the basis of health status at the time of surgery and intraoperative variables that affect results, patients’ outcomes after carotid endarterectomy do not appear to depend on the attending surgeon’s primary specialty.
ABBREVIATIONSBMI = body mass index; CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation; CPT = Current Procedural Terminology; CVA = cerebrovascular accident; DVT = deep venous thrombosis; GS = general surgery; ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; INR = international normalized ratio; LOS = length of hospital stay; MI = myocardial infarction; NS = neurosurgery; NSQIP = National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; OR = operating room; TIA = transient ischemic attack; VS = vascular surgery.
AbuRahmaAF, StonePA, SrivastavaM, HassSM, MousaAY, DeanLS, : The effect of surgeon’s specialty and volume on the perioperative outcome of carotid endarterectomy. 58:666–672, 20132360182710.1016/j.jvs.2013.02.016)| false
AhmedS, ElsheikhM, StrattonIM, PageRC, AdamsCB, WassJA: Outcome of transphenoidal surgery for acromegaly and its relationship to surgical experience. 50:561–567, 199910.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00760.x10468920)| false
AustinPC: Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement. 134:1128–1135, 200710.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.07.02117976439)| false
AustinPC: The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. 33:1242–1258, 201410.1002/sim.598424122911)| false
BergstralhEJKosankeJL: Computerized Matching of Cases to Controls. Technical Report Number 56. Rochester, MN: Mayo Clinic1995 (http://www.mayo.edu/research/documents/biostat-56pdf/doc-10026923) [Accessed April 6 2018]
BergstralhEJ, KosankeJL: Computerized Matching of Cases to Controls. Technical Report Number 56. Rochester, MN: Mayo Clinic, 1995 (http://www.mayo.edu/research/documents/biostat-56pdf/doc-10026923) [Accessed April 6, 2018])| false
CowanJAJrDimickJBThompsonBGStanleyJCUpchurchGRJr: Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume. J Am Coll Surg195:814–8212002
CowanJAJr, DimickJB, ThompsonBG, StanleyJC, UpchurchGRJr: Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume. 195:814–821, 20021249531410.1016/S1072-7515(02)01345-5)| false
EnomotoLM, HillDC, DillonPW, HanDC, HollenbeakCS: Surgical specialty and outcomes for carotid endarterectomy: evidence from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. 188:339–348, 201410.1016/j.jss.2013.11.111924480081)| false
HannanEL, PoppAJ, FeustelP, HalmE, BernardiniG, WaldmanJ, : Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy. 32:2890–2897, 200110.1161/hs1201.09963711739992)| false
KhuriSF, HendersonWG, DaleyJ, JonassonO, JonesRS, CampbellDAJr, : The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. 204:1089–1102, 200710.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.028)| false
RinglebPAAllenbergJBrückmannHEcksteinHHFraedrichGHartmannM: 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet368:1239–12472006
RinglebPA, AllenbergJ, BrückmannH, EcksteinHH, FraedrichG, HartmannM, : 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. 368:1239–1247, 20061702772910.1016/S0140-6736(06)69122-8)| false
RoubinGSNewGIyerSSVitekJJAl-MubarakNLiuMW: Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation103:532–5372001
RoubinGS, NewG, IyerSS, VitekJJ, Al-MubarakN, LiuMW, : Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. 103:532–537, 200110.1161/01.CIR.103.4.53211157718)| false
SchmidtCMTurriniOParikhPHouseMGZyromskiNJNakeebA: Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg145:634–6402010
ShiloachMFrencherSKJrSteegerJERowellKSBartzokisKTomehMG: Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg210:6–162010
ShiloachM, FrencherSKJr, SteegerJE, RowellKS, BartzokisK, TomehMG, : Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. 210:6–16, 20102012332510.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031)| false
WittPD, WahlenJC, MarshJL, GramesLM, PilgramTK: The effect of surgeon experience on velopharyngeal functional outcome following palatoplasty: is there a learning curve?102:1375–1384, 199810.1097/00006534-199810000-00009)| false