Ventricular shunt (VS) durability has been well studied in the pediatric population and in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus; however, further evaluation in a more heterogeneous adult population is needed. This study aims to evaluate the effect of diagnosis and valve type—fixed versus programmable—on shunt durability and cost for placement of shunts in adult patients.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent implantation of a VS for hydrocephalus at their institution over a 3-year period between August 2013 and October 2016 with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 6 months. The primary outcome was shunt revision, which was defined as reoperation for any indication after the initial procedure. Supply costs, shunt durability, and hydrocephalus etiologies were compared between fixed and programmable valves.
A total of 417 patients underwent shunt placement during the index time frame, consisting of 62 fixed shunts (15%) and 355 programmable shunts (85%). The mean follow-up was 30 ± 12 (SD) months. The shunt revision rate was 22% for programmable pressure valves and 21% for fixed pressure valves (HR 1.1 [95% CI 0.6–1.8]). Shunt complications, such as valve failure, infection, and overdrainage, occurred with similar frequency across valve types. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed no difference in durability between fixed (mean 39 months) and programmable (mean 40 months) shunts (p = 0.980, log-rank test). The median shunt supply cost per index case and accounting for subsequent revisions was $3438 (interquartile range $2938–$3876) and $1504 (interquartile range $753–$1584) for programmable and fixed shunts, respectively (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Of all hydrocephalus etiologies, pseudotumor cerebri (HR 1.9 [95% CI 1.2–3.1]) and previous shunt malfunction (HR 1.8 [95% CI 1.2–2.7]) were found to significantly increase the risk of shunt revision. Within each diagnosis, there were no significant differences in revision rates between shunts with a fixed valve and shunts with a programmable valve.
Long-term shunt revision rates are similar for fixed and programmable shunt pressure valves in adult patients. Hydrocephalus etiology may play a significant role in predicting shunt revision, although programmable valves incur higher supply costs regardless of initial diagnosis. Utilization of fixed pressure valves versus programmable pressure valves may reduce supply costs while maintaining similar revision rates. Given the importance of developing cost-effective management protocols, this study highlights the critical need for large-scale prospective observational studies and randomized clinical trials of ventricular shunt valve revisions and additional patient-centered outcomes.
ABBREVIATIONSNPH = normal pressure hydrocephalus; VS = ventricular shunt.
FarahmandDSæhleTEidePKTisellMHellströmPWikkelsöC: A double-blind randomized trial on the clinical effect of different shunt valve settings in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg124:359–3672016
FarahmandD, SæhleT, EidePK, TisellM, HellströmP, WikkelsöC: A double-blind randomized trial on the clinical effect of different shunt valve settings in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. 124:359–367, 201610.3171/2015.1.JNS14130126315004)| false
LemckeJMeierUMüllerCFritschMJKehlerULangerN: Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry84:850–8572013
LemckeJ, MeierU, MüllerC, FritschMJ, KehlerU, LangerN, : Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA). 84:850–857, 201310.1136/jnnp-2012-30393623457222)| false
Lund-JohansenM, SvendsenF, WesterK: Shunt failures and complications in adults as related to shunt type, diagnosis, and the experience of the surgeon. 35:839–844, 199410.1227/00006123-199411000-000067838331)| false
McGirtMJBuckDWIISciubbaDWoodworthGFCarsonBWeingartJ: Adjustable vs set-pressure valves decrease the risk of proximal shunt obstruction in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst23:289–2952007
McGirtMJ, BuckDWII, SciubbaD, WoodworthGF, CarsonB, WeingartJ, : Adjustable vs set-pressure valves decrease the risk of proximal shunt obstruction in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. 23:289–295, 200710.1007/s00381-006-0226-017106749)| false
PollackIF, AlbrightAL, AdelsonPD: A randomized, controlled study of a programmable shunt valve versus a conventional valve for patients with hydrocephalus. 45:1399–1411, 19991059870810.1097/00006123-199912000-00026)| false
ReddyGKShiRNandaAGuthikondaB: Obstructive hydrocephalus in adult patients: the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport experience with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. World Neurosurg76:176–1822011(Erratum in World Neurosurg 78:e1 2012)
ReddyGK, ShiR, NandaA, GuthikondaB: Obstructive hydrocephalus in adult patients: the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport experience with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. 76:176–182, 2011(Erratum in World Neurosurg 78:e1, 2012)2183997110.1016/j.wneu.2011.01.032)| false
RingelF, SchrammJ, MeyerB: Comparison of programmable shunt valves vs standard valves for communicating hydrocephalus of adults: a retrospective analysis of 407 patients. 63:36–41, 20051563951910.1016/j.surneu.2004.03.015)| false
WeinerHL, ConstantiniS, CohenH, WisoffJH: Current treatment of normal-pressure hydrocephalus: comparison of flow-regulated and differential-pressure shunt valves. 37:877–884, 1995855933510.1227/00006123-199511000-00005)| false
ZiebellMWetterslevJTisellMGluudCJuhlerM: Flow-regulated versus differential pressure-regulated shunt valves for adult patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (5):CD0097062013