Predictors of cerebral aneurysm persistence and occlusion after flow diversion: a single-institution series of 445 cases with angiographic follow-up

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • 2 Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles; and
  • 3 Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, California
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Flow diversion requires neointimal stent overgrowth to deliver aneurysm occlusion. The existing literature on aneurysm occlusion is limited by heterogeneous follow-up, variable antiplatelet regimens, noninvasive imaging modalities, and nonstandard occlusion assessment. Using a large, single-center cohort with low attrition and standardized antiplatelet tapering, the authors evaluated outcomes after flow diversion of anterior circulation aneurysms to identify predictors of occlusion and aneurysm persistence.

METHODS

Data from a prospective, IRB-approved database was analyzed for all patients with anterior circulation aneurysms treated by flow diversion with the Pipeline embolization device (PED) at the authors’ institution. Follow-up consisted of catheter cerebral angiography at 6 and 12 months postembolization. Clopidogrel was discontinued at 6 months and aspirin was reduced to 81 mg daily at 12 months. Occlusion was graded as complete, trace filling, entry remnant, or aneurysm filling. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of aneurysm persistence.

RESULTS

Follow-up catheter angiography studies were available for 445 (91%) of 491 PED procedures performed for anterior circulation aneurysms between August 2011 and August 2016. Three hundred eighty-seven patients accounted for these 445 lesions with follow-up angiography. The population was 84% female; mean age was 56 years and mean aneurysm size was 6.6 mm. Aneurysms arose from the internal carotid artery (83%), anterior cerebral artery (13%), and middle cerebral artery (4%). Morphology was saccular in 90% of the lesions, and 18% of the aneurysms has been previously treated. Overall, complete occlusion was achieved in 82% of cases at a mean follow-up of 14 months. Complete occlusion was achieved in 72%, 78%, and 87% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. At 12 months, adjunctive coiling predicted occlusion (OR 0.260, p = 0.036), while male sex (OR 2.923, p = 0.032), aneurysm size (OR 3.584, p = 0.011), and incorporation of a branch vessel (OR 2.206, p = 0.035) predicted persistence. Notable variables that did not predict aneurysm occlusion were prior treatments, vessel of origin, fusiform morphology, and number of devices used.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest single-institution study showing high rates of anterior circulation aneurysm occlusion after Pipeline embolization. Predictors of persistence after flow diversion included increasing aneurysm size and incorporated branch vessel, whereas adjunctive coiling predicted occlusion.

ABBREVIATIONS ACA = anterior cerebral artery; ACoA = anterior communicating artery; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; ICA = internal carotid artery; MCA = middle cerebral artery; PCoA = posterior communicating artery; PED = Pipeline embolization device; PUFS = Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Alexander Coon: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD. acoon2@jhmi.edu.

ACCOMPANYING EDITORIAL DOI: 10.3171/2018.2.JNS1836.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 30, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2017.11.JNS171738.

M.T.B. and G.P.C. share first authorship of this work.

Disclosures A.L.C. is a consultant and proctor for Medtronic, Stryker, Microvention, and Sequent and is a consultant for InNeruroCo. G.P.C. receives research support from Medtronic and Stryker and is a consultant for Microvention. L.M.L. receives research support from Microvention and Stryker and is a consultant for Medtronic. J.H. owns stock in LONGEVITI.

  • 1

    Attali J, Benaissa A, Soize S, Kadziolka K, Portefaix C, Pierot L: Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverter: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard. J Neurointerv Surg 8:8186, 2016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Becske T, Brinjikji W, Potts MB, Kallmes DF, Shapiro M, Moran CJ, : Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following Pipeline Embolization Device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery 80:4048, 2017

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, : Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 267:858868, 2013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Becske T, Potts MB, Shapiro M, Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Saatci I, : Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg 127:8188, 2017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Beitzke M, Leber KA, Deutschmann H, Gattringer T, Poltrum B, Fazekas F: Cerebrovascular complications and granuloma formation after wrapping or coating of intracranial aneurysms with cotton gauze and human fibrin adhesives: results from a single-center patient series over a 5-year period. J Neurosurg 119:10091014, 2013

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Bender MT, Lin LM, Colby GP, Lubelski D, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, : P2Y12 hyporesponse (PRU>200) is not associated with increased thromboembolic complications in anterior circulation Pipeline. J Neurointerv Surg 9:978981, 2017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Briganti F, Napoli M, Leone G, Marseglia M, Mariniello G, Caranci F, : Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by flow diverter devices: long-term results from a single center. Eur J Radiol 83:16831690, 2014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Siddiqui AH, Boccardi E, Cekirge S, : Risk factors for ischemic complications following Pipeline Embolization Device treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results from the IntrePED Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:16731678, 2016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF: Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 44:442447, 2013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Brown MA, Parish J, Guandique CF, Payner TD, Horner T, Leipzig T, : A long-term study of durability and risk factors for aneurysm recurrence after microsurgical clip ligation. J Neurosurg 126:819824, 2017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Bruneau M, Amin-Hanjani S, Koroknay-Pal P, Bijlenga P, Jahromi BR, Lehto H, : Surgical clipping of very small unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter international study. Neurosurgery 78:4752, 2016

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Burkhardt JK, Chua MHJ, Weiss M, Do ASS, Winkler EA, Lawton MT: Risk of aneurysm residual regrowth, recurrence, and de novo aneurysm formation after microsurgical clip occlusion based on follow-up with catheter angiography. World Neurosurg 106:7484, 2017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Phillips JLH, Starke RM, Hasan D, Wu C, : A single Pipeline Embolization Device is sufficient for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:15621566, 2014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Chalouhi N, Zanaty M, Whiting A, Yang S, Tjoumakaris S, Hasan D, : Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline Embolization Device in 100 small intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 122:14981502, 2015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Chiu AHY, Cheung AK, Wenderoth JD, De Villiers L, Rice H, Phatouros CC, : Long-term follow-up results following elective treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:17281734, 2015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Choi DS, Kim MC, Lee SK, Willinsky RA, Terbrugge KG: Clinical and angiographic long-term follow-up of completely coiled intracranial aneurysms using endovascular technique. J Neurosurg 112:575581, 2010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Colby GP, Bender MT, Lin LM, Beaty N, Caplan JM, Jiang B, : Declining complication rates with flow diversion of anterior circulation aneurysms after introduction of the Pipeline Flex: analysis of a single-institution series of 568 cases. J Neurosurg [epub ahead of print January 12, 2018. DOI: 10.3171/2017.7.JNS171289]

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Colby GP, Lin LM, Gomez JF, Paul AR, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, : Immediate procedural outcomes in 35 consecutive pipeline embolization cases: a single-center, single-user experience. J Neurointerv Surg 5:237246, 2013

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Fischer S, Vajda Z, Aguilar Perez M, Schmid E, Hopf N, Bäzner H, : Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 54:369382, 2012

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Jabbour P, Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Gonzalez LF, Dumont AS, Randazzo C, : The Pipeline Embolization Device: learning curve and predictors of complications and aneurysm obliteration. Neurosurgery 73:113120, 2013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Kabbasch C, Mpotsaris A, Behme D, Dorn F, Stavrinou P, Liebig T: Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms—the more, the better? A single-center retrospective observational study. J Vasc Interv Neurol 9:1420, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Boccardi E, Ciceri E, Diaz O, Tawk R, : Aneurysm Study of Pipeline in an Observational Registry (ASPIRe). Intervent Neurol 5:8999, 2016

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, Fiorella D, Hanel RA, Jabbour P, : Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg 127:775780, 2017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Kan P, Srinivasan VM, Mbabuike N, Tawk RG, Ban VS, Welch BG, : Aneurysms with persistent patency after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurosurg 126:18941898, 2017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Lin LM, Colby GP, Kim JE, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, Coon AL: Immediate and follow-up results for 44 consecutive cases of small (<10 mm) internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device. Surg Neurol Int 4:114, 2013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Lin N, Brouillard AM, Krishna C, Mokin M, Natarajan SK, Sonig A, : Use of coils in conjunction with the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 76:142149, 2015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Lin N, Lanzino G, Lopes DK, Arthur AS, Ogilvy CS, Ecker RD, : Treatment of distal anterior circulation aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: a US multicenter experience. Neurosurgery 79:1422, 2016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Linzey JR, Griauzde J, Guan Z, Bentley N, Gemmete JJ, Chaudhary N, : Stent-assisted coiling of cerebrovascular aneurysms: experience at a large tertiary care center with a focus on predictors of recurrence. J Neurointerv Surg 9:10811085, 2017

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Scrivano E, Luna HR, : Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 64:632643, N6, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    McAuliffe W, Wycoco V, Rice H, Phatouros C, Singh TJ, Wenderoth J: Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:164170, 2012

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Monteith SJ, Tsimpas A, Dumont AS, Tjoumakaris S, Gonzalez LF, Rosenwasser RH, : Endovascular treatment of fusiform cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurosurg 120:945954, 2014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Moshayedi H, Omofoye OA, Yap E, Oyekunle TO, Sasaki-Adams DM, Solander SY: Factors affecting the obliteration rate of intracranial aneurysms treated with a single Pipeline embolization device. World Neurosurg 104:205212, 2017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Nossek E, Chalif DJ, Chakraborty S, Lombardo K, Black KS, Setton A: Concurrent use of the Pipeline Embolization Device and coils for intracranial aneurysms: technique, safety, and efficacy. J Neurosurg 122:904911, 2015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    O’Kelly CJ, Krings T, Fiorella D, Marotta TR: A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 16:133137, 2010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    O’Kelly CJ, Spears J, Chow M, Wong J, Boulton M, Weill A, : Canadian experience with the Pipeline embolization device for repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:381387, 2013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Park MS, Mazur MD, Moon K, Nanaszko MJ, Kestle JRW, Shah LM, : An outcomes-based grading scale for the evaluation of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion. J Neurointerv Surg 9:10601063, 2017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Perrini P, Montemurro N, Caniglia M, Lazzarotti G, Benedetto N: Wrapping of intracranial aneurysms: single-center series and systematic review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg 29:785791, 2015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Puffer RC, Piano M, Lanzino G, Valvassori L, Kallmes DF, Quilici L, : Treatment of cavernous sinus aneurysms with flow diversion: results in 44 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:948951, 2014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, Georganos SA, Juravsky L, Lambert A, : Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 34:13981403, 2003

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Saatci I, Yavuz K, Ozer C, Geyik S, Cekirge HS: Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:14361446, 2012

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Shapiro M, Becske T, Nelson PK: Learning from failure: persistence of aneurysms following pipeline embolization. J Neurosurg 126:578585, 2017

  • 42

    Suh SH, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G, Woodward K, Kallmes DF: Interobserver agreement after Pipeline embolization device implantation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:12151218, 2013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Tsang ACO, Fung AMY, Tsang FCP, Leung GKK, Lee R, Lui WM: Failure of flow diverter treatment of intracranial aneurysms related to the fetal-type posterior communicating artery. Neurointervention 10:6066, 2015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Yu SC, Kwok CK, Cheng PW, Chan KY, Lau SS, Lui WM, : Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of pipeline embolization device—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 265:893901, 2012

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Zheng Y, Song Y, Liu Y, Xu Q, Tian Y, Leng B: Stent-assisted coiling of 501 wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: a single-center 8-year experience. World Neurosurg 94:285295, 2016

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 512 203 0
Full Text Views 378 218 25
PDF Downloads 303 118 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0