Value of whole-body low-dose computed tomography in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: a retrospective study

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurosurgery,
  • 2 Neuroradiology, and
  • 3 Radiology; and
  • 4 Section for Experimental Radiology, University of Ulm, Günzburg, Germany
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

The gold standard for evaluation of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt position, dislocation, or disconnection is conventional radiography. Yet, assessment with this modality can be challenging because of low image quality and can result in repetitive radiation exposure with high fluctuation in the radiation dose. Recently, CT-based radiation doses have been significantly reduced by using low-dose protocols. Thus, whole-body low-dose CT (LDCT) has become applicable for routine use in VP shunt evaluation. The authors here compared image quality and approximate radiation dose between radiography and LDCT in patients with implanted VP shunt systems.

METHODS

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt systems have been investigated with LDCT scanning at the authors’ department since 2015. A consecutive series of 57 patients (70 investigations) treated between 2015 and 2016 was retrospectively assessed. A historical patient cohort that had been evaluated with radiography was compared with the LDCT patients in terms of radiation dose and image quality. Three independent observers evaluated projection of the valve pressure level and correct intraperitoneal position, as well as complete shunt projection, using a Likert-type scale of 1–5, where 1 indicated “not assessable” and 5 meant “assessable with high accuracy.” Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U-test were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven radiographs (38.6%) and 43 LDCT scans (61.4%) were analyzed. The median dose-length product (DLP) of the LDCT scans was 100 mGy·cm (range 59.9–183 mGy·cm). The median total dose-area product (DAP) of the radiographic images was 3177 mGy·cm2 (range 641–13,833 mGy·cm2). The estimated effective dose (EED) was significantly lower with the LDCT scan (p < 0.001). The median EED was 4.93 and 1.90 mSv for radiographs and LDCT, respectively. Significantly better identification of the abdominal position of the distal shunt catheter was achieved with LDCT (p < 0.001). Simultaneously, significantly improved visualization of the entire shunt system was realized with this technique (p < 0.001). On the contrary, identification of the valve settings was significantly worse with LDCT (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-body LDCT scanning allows good visualization of the distal catheter after VP shunt placement. Despite the fact that only a rough estimation of effective doses is possible in a direct comparison of LDCT and radiography, the data showed that shunt assessment via LDCT does not lead to greater radiation exposure. Thus, especially in difficult anatomical conditions, as in patients who have undergone multiple intraabdominal surgeries, have a high BMI, or are immobile, the use of LDCT shunt evaluation has high clinical value. Further data are needed to determine the value of LDCT for the evaluation of complications or radiation dose in pediatric patients.

ABBREVIATIONS BMI = body mass index; DAP = dose-area product; DLP = dose-length product; EED = estimated effective dose; LDCT = low-dose CT; VP = ventriculoperitoneal.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Andrej Pala: University of Ulm, Günzburg, Germany. andrej.pala@uni-ulm.de.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online January 5, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2017.7.JNS17476.

Disclosures The authors report no conflicts of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

  • 1

    Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Chen J, Ting HH, : Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 361:849857, 2009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Lutz BR, Venkataraman P, Browd SR: New and improved ways to treat hydrocephalus: Pursuit of a smart shunt. Surg Neurol Int 4 (Suppl 1):S38S50, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Othman AE, Afat S, Hamou HA, Pjontek R, Tsiflikas I, Nikoubashman O, : High-pitch low-dose whole-body computed tomography for the assessment of ventriculoperitoneal shunts in a pediatric patient model: an experimental ex vivo study in rabbits. Invest Radiol 50:858862, 2015

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Prokop M: [Radiation dose in computed tomography. Risks and challenges.] Radiologe 48:229242, 2008 (Ger)

  • 5

    Schucht P, Banz V, Trochsler M, Iff S, Krähenbühl AK, Reinert M, : Laparoscopically assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg 122:10581067, 2015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Tuli S, Drake J, Lawless J, Wigg M, Lamberti-Pasculli M: Risk factors for repeated cerebrospinal shunt failures in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 92:3138, 2000

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Udayasankar UK, Braithwaite K, Arvaniti M, Tudorascu D, Small WC, Little S, : Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:802806, 2008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 465 57 0
Full Text Views 361 180 13
PDF Downloads 222 89 8
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0