The use of alternatives to clopidogrel in flow-diversion treatment with the Pipeline embolization device

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

Thromboembolic complications continue to be encountered with Pipeline embolization devices (PEDs) despite routine clopidogrel/aspirin antiplatelet therapy. This study examined the safety and efficacy of prasugrel in the management of clopidogrel-resistant patients treated for cerebral aneurysms.

METHODS

Four hundred thirty-seven consecutive patients were identified between January 2011 and May 2016. Patients allergic, or having less than 30% platelet inhibition, to a daily 75-mg dose of clopidogrel received 10 mg of prasugrel daily (n = 20) or 90 mg of ticagrelor twice daily (n = 2). The mean (± SD) follow-up duration was 15.8 ± 12.4 months. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score registered before discharge and at each follow-up visit. To control confounding, multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression and propensity score conditioning were used.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (5.9%) of 437 patients presented with a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The mean patient age was 56.3 years, and 62 were women (14.2%). One of the 7 patients lost to follow-up received prasugrel. One patient was allergic to clopidogrel and prasugrel simultaneously. All patients receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor (n = 22) had an mRS score ≤ 2 on their latest follow-up visit (mean score 0.67 ± 1.15). In a multivariate analysis, clopidogrel did not affect the mRS score on last follow-up (p = 0.14). Multivariable logistic regression showed that clopidogrel was not associated with an increased long-term recurrence rate (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.01–2.70, p = 0.21), an increased thromboembolic complication rate (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.12–1.67, p = 0.24), or an increased hemorrhagic event rate (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.91–1.64, p = 0.20). None of the patients receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor died or suffered a long-term recurrence or a hemorrhagic event; only 1 patient suffered from mild aphasia subsequent to a thromboembolic event. Three patients taking clopidogrel died during the study: 2 from acute SAH and 1 from intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Clopidogrel was not associated with an increased mortality rate (OR 2.18, 95% CI 0.11–43.27, p = 0.61). The same associations were present in propensity score–adjusted models.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of patients treated with PEDs, prasugrel (10 mg/day) was a safe alternative to clopidogrel-resistant or clopidogrel-allergic patients, or nonresponders.

ABBREVIATIONS DAPT = dual antiplatelet therapy; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; PED = Pipeline embolization device; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; TRITON-TIMI 38 = Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38.

Article Information

Correspondence Pascal Jabbour, Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 901 Walnut St., 3rd Fl., Philadelphia, PA 19107. email: pascal.jabbour@jefferson.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online December 8, 2017; DOI: 10.3171/2017.5.JNS162663.

Disclosures Drs. Tjoumakaris and Jabbour report being consultants for Medtronic.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Graph showing the mean values of the clinical outcomes according to the prescribed antiplatelet drug. pop. = population. Figure is available in color online only.

References

  • 1

    Akbari SHReynolds MRKadkhodayan YCross DT IIIMoran CJ: Hemorrhagic complications after prasugrel (Effient) therapy for vascular neurointerventional procedures. J Neurointerv Surg 5:3373432013

  • 2

    Delgado Almandoz JEKadkhodayan YCrandall BMScholz JMFease JLTubman DE: Variability in initial response to standard clopidogrel therapy, delayed conversion to clopidogrel hyper-response, and associated thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 6:7677732014

  • 3

    Dobesh PPVarnado SDoyle M: Antiplatelet agents in cardiology: a report on aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. Curr Pharm Des 22:191819322016

  • 4

    Guédon AClarençon FDi Maria FRosso CBiondi AGabrieli J: Very late ischemic complications in flow-diverter stents: a retrospective analysis of a single-center series. J Neurosurg 125:9299352016

  • 5

    Gupta RMoore JMGriessenauer CJAdeeb NPatel ASYoun R: Assessment of dual-antiplatelet regimen for Pipeline Embolization Device placement: a survey of major academic neurovascular centers in the United States. World Neurosurg 96:2852922016

  • 6

    Hanel RATaussky PDixon TMiller DASapin MNordeen JD: Safety and efficacy of ticagrelor for neuroendovascular procedures. A single center initial experience. J Neurointerv Surg 6:3203222014

  • 7

    Jones GMTwilla JDHoit DAArthur AS: Prevention of stent thrombosis with reduced dose of prasugrel in two patients undergoing treatment of cerebral aneurysms with pipeline embolisation devices. J Neurointerv Surg 5:e382013

  • 8

    Leslie-Mazwi TMChandra RVOh DCNogueira RG: Novel use of prasugrel for intracranial stent thrombosis. J Neurointerv Surg 3:3583602011

  • 9

    Mega JLClose SLWiviott SDShen LHockett RDBrandt JT: Cytochrome P450 genetic polymorphisms and the response to prasugrel: relationship to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical outcomes. Circulation 119:255325602009

  • 10

    Molyneux AKerr RStratton ISandercock PClarke MShrimpton J: International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:126712742002

  • 11

    Patti GRicottini EDe Luca LCavallari I: Safety and efficacy of switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a study-level meta-analysis from 15 studies. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 67:3363432016

  • 12

    Pistocchi SBlanc RBartolini BPiotin M: Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 43:103210382012

  • 13

    Qureshi AILuft ARSharma MGuterman LRHopkins LN: Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: Part I—Pathophysiological and pharmacological features. Neurosurgery 46:134413592000

  • 14

    Qureshi AILuft ARSharma MGuterman LRHopkins LN: Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: Part II—Clinical aspects and recommendations. Neurosurgery 46:136013762000

  • 15

    Stetler WRChaudhary NThompson BGGemmete JJMaher COPandey AS: Prasugrel is effective and safe for neurointerventional procedures. J Neurointerv Surg 5:3323362013

  • 16

    Tan LAKeigher KMMunich SAMoftakhar RLopes DK: Thromboembolic complications with Pipeline Embolization Device placement: impact of procedure time, number of stents and pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value. J Neurointerv Surg 7:2172212015

  • 17

    Weerakkody GJJakubowski JABrandt JTFarid NAPayne CDZhu J: Comparison of speed of onset of platelet inhibition after loading doses of clopidogrel versus prasugrel in healthy volunteers and correlation with responder status. Am J Cardiol 100:3313362007

  • 18

    Wiviott SDBraunwald EMcCabe CHMontalescot GRuzyllo WGottlieb S: Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 357:200120152007

TrendMD

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 440 440 62
Full Text Views 511 511 6
PDF Downloads 317 317 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar