The endoscopic endonasal transmaxillary transpterygoid (TMTP) approach has been the gateway for lateral skull base exposure. Removal of the cartilaginous eustachian tube (ET) and lateral mobilization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) are technically demanding adjunctive steps that are used to access the petroclival region. The gained expansion of the deep working corridor provided by these maneuvers has yet to be quantified.
The TMTP approach with cartilaginous ET removal and ICA mobilization was performed in 5 adult cadaveric heads (10 sides). Accessible portions of the petrous apex were drilled during the following 3 stages: 1) before ET removal, 2) after ET removal but before ICA mobilization, and 3) after ET removal and ICA repositioning. Resection volumes were calculated using 3D reconstructions generated from thin-slice CT scans obtained before and after each step of the dissection.
The average petrous temporal bone resection volumes at each stage were 0.21 cm3, 0.71 cm3, and 1.32 cm3 (p < 0.05, paired t-test). Without ET removal, inferior and superior access to the petrous apex was limited. Furthermore, without ICA mobilization, drilling was confined to the inferior two-thirds of the petrous apex. After mobilization, the resection was extended superiorly through the upper extent of the petrous apex.
The transpterygoid corridor to the petroclival region is maximally expanded by the resection of the cartilaginous ET and mobilization of the paraclival ICA. These added maneuvers expanded the deep window almost 6 times and provided more lateral access to the petroclival region with a maximum volume of 1.5 cm3. This may result in the ability to resect small-to-moderate sized intradural petroclival lesions up to that volume. Larger lesions may better be approached through an open transcranial approach.
Correspondence A. Samy Youssef, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado, 12631 E 17th Ave., C307, Aurora, CO 80045. email: firstname.lastname@example.org.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online July 21, 2017; DOI: 10.3171/2017.1.JNS161788.Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
BattagliaPTurri-ZanoniMDallanIGalloSSicaEPadoanG: Endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid transmaxillary approach to the infratemporal and upper parapharyngeal tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg150:696–7022014
BoariN, RobertiF, BiglioliF, CaputyAJ, MortiniP: Quantification of clival and paraclival exposure in the Le Fort I transmaxillary transpterygoid approach: a microanatomical study. 113:1011–1018, 201010.3171/2010.4.JNS091887)| false
CavalloLM, MessinaA, CappabiancaP, EspositoF, de DivitiisE, GardnerP, : Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. 19(1):E2, 200516078816)| false
FreemanJLSampathRCaseyMAQuattlebaumSCRamakrishnanVRYoussefAS: Transposition of the paraclival carotid artery: a novel concept of self-retaining vascular retraction during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery technical report. Acta Neurochir (Wien)158:1625–16292016
FreemanJL, SampathR, CaseyMA, QuattlebaumSC, RamakrishnanVR, YoussefAS: Transposition of the paraclival carotid artery: a novel concept of self-retaining vascular retraction during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery technical report. 158:1625–1629, 201610.1007/s00701-016-2873-627339269)| false
HofstetterCPSinghAAnandVKKackerASchwartzTH: The endoscopic, endonasal, transmaxillary transpterygoid approach to the pterygopalatine fossa, infratemporal fossa, petrous apex, and the Meckel cave. J Neurosurg113:967–9742010
JacquessonTBerhoumaMTringaliSSimonEJouanneauE: Which routes for petroclival tumors? A comparison between the anterior expanded endoscopic endonasal approach and lateral or posterior routes. World Neurosurg83:929–9362015
JacquessonT, BerhoumaM, TringaliS, SimonE, JouanneauE: Which routes for petroclival tumors? A comparison between the anterior expanded endoscopic endonasal approach and lateral or posterior routes. 83:929–936, 201510.1016/j.wneu.2015.02.00325700970)| false
JacquessonTSimonEBerhoumaMJouanneauE: Anatomic comparison of anterior petrosectomy versus the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach: interest in petroclival tumors surgery. Surg Radiol Anat37:1199–12072015
KantolaVE, McGarryGW, ReaPM: Endonasal, transmaxillary, transpterygoid approach to the foramen ovale: radio-anatomical study of surgical feasibility. 127:1093–1102, 201310.1017/S002221511300233824148265)| false
KassamABGardnerPSnydermanCMintzACarrauR: Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus19(1):E62005
KomatsuF, KomatsuM, Di IevaA, TschabitscherM: Endoscopic approaches to the trigeminal nerve and clinical consideration for trigeminal schwannomas: a cadaveric study. 117:690–696, 201210.3171/2012.7.JNS1173022900839)| false
Van GompelJJAlikhaniPTaborMHvan LoverenHRAgazziSFroelichS: Anterior inferior petrosectomy: defining the role of endonasal endoscopic techniques for petrous apex approaches. J Neurosurg120:1321–13252014
Van GompelJJ, AlikhaniP, TaborMH, van LoverenHR, AgazziS, FroelichS, : Anterior inferior petrosectomy: defining the role of endonasal endoscopic techniques for petrous apex approaches. 120:1321–1325, 201410.3171/2014.2.JNS131773)| false
ZiyalIM, SalasE, WrightDC, SekharLN: The petrolingual ligament: the anatomy and surgical exposure of the posterolateral landmark of the cavernous sinus. 140:201–205, 199810.1007/s0070100500869638256)| false