Timing of cranioplasty: a 10.75-year single-center analysis of 754 patients

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

Despite their technical simplicity, cranioplasty procedures carry high reported morbidity rates. The authors here present the largest study to date on complications after cranioplasty, focusing specifically on the relationship between complications and timing of the operation.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed all cranioplasty cases performed at Harborview Medical Center over the past 10.75 years. In addition to relevant clinical and demographic characteristics, patient morbidity and mortality data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to analyze variables potentially associated with the risk of infection, hydrocephalus, seizure, hematoma, and bone flap resorption.

RESULTS

Over the course of 10.75 years, 754 cranioplasties were performed at a single institution. Sixty percent of the patients who underwent these cranioplasties were male, and the median follow-up overall was 233 days. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.26% (2 cases, both due to postoperative epidural hematoma). Overall, 24.6% percent of the patients experienced at least 1 complication including infection necessitating explantation of the flap (6.6%), postoperative hydrocephalus requiring a shunt (9.0%), resorption of the flap requiring synthetic cranioplasty (6.3%), seizure (4.1%), postoperative hematoma requiring evacuation (2.3%), and other (1.6%).

The rate of infection was significantly higher if the cranioplasty had been performed < 14 days after the initial craniectomy (p = 0.007, Holm-Bonferroni–adjusted p = 0.028). Hydrocephalus was significantly correlated with time to cranioplasty (OR 0.92 per 10-day increase, p < 0.001) and was most common in patients whose cranioplasty had been performed < 90 days after initial craniectomy. New-onset seizure, however, only occurred in patients who had undergone their cranioplasty > 90 days after initial craniectomy. Bone flap resorption was the least likely complication for patients whose cranioplasty had been performed between 15 and 30 days after initial craniectomy. Resorption was also correlated with patient age, with a hazard ratio of 0.67 per increase of 10 years of age (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cranioplasty performed between 15 and 30 days after initial craniectomy may minimize infection, seizure, and bone flap resorption, whereas waiting > 90 days may minimize hydrocephalus but may increase the risk of seizure.

ABBREVIATIONS IPH = intraparenchymal hemorrhage; MCA = middle cerebral artery; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; TBI = traumatic brain injury.

Article Information

Correspondence Ryan P. Morton, c/o Neuroscience Publications, University of Washington, Box 359924, 325 9th Ave., Seattle, WA 98104. email: publications@neurosurgery.washington.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online August 11, 2017; DOI: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161917.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Complication rate of cranioplasty versus timing of surgery. d = days; Hydo = hydrocephalus; Sz = seizure.

References

1

Chang VHartzfeld PLanglois MMahmood ASeyfried D: Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. J Neurosurg 112:112011242010

2

Chibbaro SDi Rocco FMirone GFricia MMakiese O: Decompressive craniectomy and early cranioplasty for the management of severe head injury: a prospective multicenter study on 147 patients. World Neurosurg 75:5585622011

3

De Bonis PFrassanito PMangiola ANucci CGAnile CPompucci A: Cranial repair: how complicated is filling a “hole”? J Neurotrauma 29:107110762012

4

Gooch MRGin GEKenning TJGerman JW: Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Focus 26(6):E92009

5

Grossman NShemesh-Jan HSMerkin VGideon MCohen A: Deep-freeze preservation of cranial bones for future cranioplasty: nine years of experience in Soroka University Medical Center. Cell Tissue Bank 8:2432462007

6

Iwama TYamada JImai SShinoda JFunakoshi TSakai N: The use of frozen autogenous bone flaps in delayed cranioplasty revisited. Neurosurgery 52:5955962003

7

Jho DHNeckrysh SHardman JCharbel FTAmin-Hanjani S: Ethylene oxide gas sterilization: a simple technique for storing explanted skull bone. Technical note. J Neurosurg 107:4404452007

8

Kriegel RJSchaller CClusmann H: Cranioplasty for large skull defects with PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) or Tutoplast processed autogenic bone grafts. Zentralbl Neurochir 68:1821892007

9

Liang WXiaofeng YWeiguo LGang SXuesheng Z: Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma. J Craniofac Surg 18:5265322007

10

Liao CCKao MC: Cranioplasty for patients with severe depressed skull bone defect after cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Clin Neurosci 9:5535552002

11

Lu YHui GLiu FWang ZTang YGao S: Survival and regeneration of deep-freeze preserved autologous cranial bones after cranioplasty. Br J Neurosurg 26:2162212012

12

Morina AKelmendi FMorina QDragusha SAhmeti F: Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts in abdominal wall—experience with 75 cases in a post-war country Kosova. Surg Neurol Int 2:722011

13

Morton RPAbecassis IJHanson JFBarber JNerva JD: Predictors of infection after 754 cranioplasty operations and the value of intraoperative cultures for cryopreserved bone flaps. J Neurosurg 125:7667702016

14

Movassaghi KVer Halen JGanchi PAmin-Hanjani SMesa JYaremchuk MJ: Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2022062006

15

Piedra MPThompson EMSelden NRRagel BTGuillaume DJ: Optimal timing of autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 10:2682722012

16

Sobani ZAShamim MSZafar SNQadeer MBilal N: Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: An institutional audit and analysis of factors related to complications. Surg Neurol Int 2:1232011

17

Staffa GNataloni ACompagnone CServadei F: Custom made cranioplasty prostheses in porous hydroxy-apatite using 3D design techniques: 7 years experience in 25 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 149:1611702007

18

Stephens FLMossop CMBell RSTigno T JrRosner MK: Cranioplasty complications following wartime decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurg Focus 28(5):E32010

19

Walcott BPKwon CSSheth SAFehnel CRKoffie RM: Predictors of cranioplasty complications in stroke and trauma patients. J Neurosurg 118:7577622013

20

Wiggins AAusterberry RMorrison DHo KMHoneybul S: Cranioplasty with custom-made titanium plates—14 years experience. Neurosurgery 72:2482562013

21

Wurm GTomancok BHoll KTrenkler J: Prospective study on cranioplasty with individual carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) implants produced by means of stereolithography. Surg Neurol 62:5105212004

22

Yadla SCampbell PGChitale RMaltenfort MGJabbour PSharan AD: Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 68:112411302011

23

Zanaty MChalouhi NStarke RMClark SWBovenzi CD: Complications following cranioplasty: incidence and predictors in 348 cases. J Neurosurg 123:1821882015

TrendMD

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 944 944 460
Full Text Views 1206 1206 42
PDF Downloads 292 292 26
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar