Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral joint-sparing condylectomy: implications for the far lateral approach revisited

Restricted access

 

OBJECTIVE

The far lateral transcondylar approach to the ventral foramen magnum requires partial resection of the occipital condyle. Early biomechanical studies suggest that occipitocervical (OC) fusion should be considered if 50% of the condyle is resected. In clinical practice, however, a joint-sparing condylectomy has often been employed without the need for OC fusion. The biomechanics of the joint-sparing technique have not been reported. Authors of the present study hypothesized that the clinically relevant joint-sparing condylectomy would result in added stability of the craniovertebral junction as compared with earlier reports.

METHODS

Multidirectional in vitro flexibility tests were performed using a robotic spine-testing system on 7 fresh cadaveric spines to assess the effect of sequential unilateral joint-sparing condylectomy (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%) in comparison with the intact state by using cardinal direction and coupled moments combined with a simulated head weight “follower load.”

RESULTS

The percent change in range of motion following sequential condylectomy as compared with the intact state was 5.2%, 8.1%, 12.0%, and 27.5% in flexion-extension (FE); 8.4%, 14.7%, 39.1%, and 80.2% in lateral bending (LB); and 24.4%, 31.5%, 49.9%, and 141.1% in axial rotation (AR). Only values at 100% condylectomy were statistically significant (p < 0.05). With coupled motions, however, −3.9%, 6.6%, 35.8%, and 142.4% increases in AR+F and 27.3%, 32.7%, 77.5%, and 175.5% increases in AR+E were found. Values for 75% and 100% condyle resection were statistically significant in AR+E.

CONCLUSIONS

When tested in the traditional cardinal directions, a 50% joint-sparing condylectomy did not significantly increase motion. However, removing 75% of the condyle may necessitate fusion, as a statistically significant increase in motion was found when E was coupled with AR. Clinical correlation is ultimately needed to determine the need for OC fusion.

ABBREVIATIONS AR = axial rotation; CVJ = craniovertebral junction; FE = flexion-extension; HWL = head weight load; LB = lateral bending; O = occiput; OC = occipitocervical; ROM = range of motion; SOC+C1 = suboccipital craniectomy with C-1 laminectomy.

Article Information

Correspondence Varun R. Kshettry, Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave., S-40, Cleveland, OH 44195. email: varunkshettry@gmail.com.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online October 14, 2016; DOI: 10.3171/2016.7.JNS16293.

Disclosures Mr. Colbrunn receives royalties from the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Innovations Department.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Testing setup. The specimen is rigidly fixed at the O and C-3. A navigation reference frame is rigidly fixed to the O, and titanium microscrew fiducial markers are registered. Optoelectric sensors are placed in the O, C-1, and C-2 to record relative ROM. A 6-axis robotic spine-testing system was used to apply head weight simulation and loading and unloading cycles of continuous moment. Figure is available in color online only.

  • View in gallery

    A: Sagittal CT demonstrating occipital condyle anatomy with a rectangular main body (green) and concave articular surface (red). B: View of the foramen magnum. Yellow indicates the area of unilateral suboccipital craniectomy. Each condyle was divided into 4 quadrants along the anatomical transverse axis. Dotted lines indicate approximate location and course of the hypoglossal canal (HC). Figure is available in color online only.

  • View in gallery

    Stereotactically guided joint-sparing condylectomy. Navigation plan (A and B) demonstrating 25% (green), 50% (red), and 75% (blue) resection lines. Navigation pointer on the lateral margin (C) and the medial margin (D) of the 25% condylar resection line. Blue dotted lines in the photographs (C and D) indicate the posterior O–C1 joint. Figure is available in color online only.

  • View in gallery

    Occiput–C1 mean ROM (% change compared with intact state) in cardinal (A) and coupled (B) movements across various surgical conditions. Asterisks indicate statistical significance compared with the intact state.

References

  • 1

    Arnautović KIAl-Mefty OHusain M: Ventral foramen magnum meningiomas. J Neurosurg Spine 92:71802000

  • 2

    Babu RPSekhar LNWright DC: Extreme lateral transcondylar approach: technical improvements and lessons learned. J Neurosurg 81:49591994

  • 3

    Banerji DBehari SJain VKPandey TChhabra DK: Extreme lateral transcondylar approach to the skull base. Neurol India 47:22301999

  • 4

    Barut NKale ATuran Suslu HOzturk ABozbuga MSahinoglu K: Evaluation of the bony landmarks in transcondylar approach. Br J Neurosurg 23:2762812009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Bassiouni HNtoukas VAsgari SSandalcioglu EIStolke DSeifert V: Foramen magnum meningiomas: clinical outcome after microsurgical resection via a posterolateral suboccipital retrocondylar approach. Neurosurgery 59:117711872006

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Bertalanffy HGilsbach JMMayfrank LKlein HMKawase TSeeger W: Microsurgical management of ventral and ventrolateral foramen magnum meningiomas. Acta Neurochir Suppl 65:82851996

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Bertalanffy HSeeger W: The dorsolateral, suboccipital, transcondylar approach to the lower clivus and anterior portion of the craniocervical junction. Neurosurgery 29:8158211991

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Bruneau MGeorge B: Foramen magnum meningiomas: detailed surgical approaches and technical aspects at Lariboisière Hospital and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 31:19332008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Chotai SKshettry VRAmmirati M: Endoscopic-assisted microsurgical techniques at the craniovertebral junction: 4 illustrative cases and literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 121:192014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Crockard HASen CN: The transoral approach for the management of intradural lesions at the craniovertebral junction: review of 7 cases. Neurosurgery 28:88981991

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    David CASpetzler RF: Foramen magnum meningiomas. Clin Neurosurg 44:4674891997

  • 12

    George BDematons CCophignon J: Lateral approach to the anterior portion of the foramen magnum. Application to surgical removal of 14 benign tumors: technical note. Surg Neurol 29:4844901988

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    George BLot G: Anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the foramen magnum: technical description and experience from 97 cases. Skull Base Surg 5:9191995

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Guidetti BSpallone A: Benign extramedullary tumors of the foramen magnum. Surg Neurol 13:9171980

  • 15

    Heros RC: Lateral suboccipital approach for vertebral and vertebrobasilar artery lesions. J Neurosurg 64:5595621986

  • 16

    Kratimenos GPCrockard HA: The far lateral approach for ventrally placed foramen magnum and upper cervical spine tumours. Br J Neurosurg 7:1291401993

  • 17

    Kshettry VRBenzel EC: Endoscopic-assisted techniques at the craniovertebral junction: understanding indications and limitations. World Neurosurg 82:e711e7122014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Kshettry VRChotai SChen WZhang JAmmirati M: Quantitative analysis of the effect of brainstem shift on surgical approaches to anterolateral tumors at the craniovertebral junction. J Clin Neurosci 21:6446502014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Kshettry VRChotai SHou JLamki TAmmirati M: Successful resection of anterior and anterolateral lesions at the craniovertebral junction using a simple posterolateral approach. J Clin Neurosci 21:6166222014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Little ASPerez-Orribo LRodriguez-Martinez NGReyes PMNewcomb AGPrevedello DM: Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after inferior-third clivectomy and intradural exposure of the foramen magnum: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base. J Neurosurg Spine 18:3273322013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Lot GGeorge B: The extent of drilling in lateral approaches to the craniocervical junction area from a series of 125 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141:1111181999

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Love JGThelen EPDodge HW Jr: Tumors of the foramen magnum. J Int Coll Surg 22:1171954

  • 23

    Margalit NSLesser JBSinger MSen C: Lateral approach to anterolateral tumors at the foramen magnum: factors determining surgical procedure. Neurosurgery 56:2 Suppl3243362005

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Menezes AHTraynelis VCGantz BJ: Surgical approaches to the craniovertebral junction. Clin Neurosurg 41:1872031994

  • 25

    Miller ECrockard HA: Transoral transclival removal of anteriorly placed meningiomas at the foramen magnum. Neurosurgery 20:9669681987

  • 26

    Mullan SNaunton RHekmat-Panah JVailati G: The use of an anterior approach to ventrally placed tumors in the foramen magnum and vertebral column. J Neurosurg 24:5365431966

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Muthukumar NSwaminathan RVenkatesh GBhanumathy SP: A morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum region as it relates to the transcondylar approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:8898952005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Naderi SKorman ECitak GGüvençer MArman CSenoğlu M: Morphometric analysis of human occipital condyle. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 107:1911992005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Nanda AVincent DAVannemreddy PSBaskaya MKChanda A: Far-lateral approach to intradural lesions of the foramen magnum without resection of the occipital condyle. J Neurosurg 96:3023092002

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Parlato CTessitore ESchonauer CMoraci A: Management of benign craniovertebral junction tumors. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145:31362003

  • 31

    Perez-Orribo LLittle ASLefevre RDReyes PRNewcomb AGPrevedello DM: Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after anterior unilateral condylectomy: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base. Neurosurgery 72:102110302013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Pritz MB: Evaluation and treatment of intradural tumours located anterior to the cervicomedullary junction by a lateral suboccipital approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 113:74811991

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Rhoton AL Jr: The far-lateral approach and its transcondylar, supracondylar, and paracondylar extensions. Neurosurgery 47:3 SupplS195S2092000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Seeger W: Atlas of Topographic Anatomy of the Brain and Surrounding Structures. ViennaSpringer1978

  • 35

    Sekhar LNRamanathan D: Evolution of far lateral and extreme lateral approaches to the skull base. World Neurosurg 77:6176182012

  • 36

    Sen CNSekhar LN: An extreme lateral approach to intradural lesions of the cervical spine and foramen magnum. Neurosurgery 27:1972041990

  • 37

    Sen CNSekhar LN: Surgical management of anteriorly placed lesions at the craniocervical junction—an alternative approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 108:70771991

  • 38

    Smolik EASachs E: Tumors of the foramen magnum of spinal origin. J Neurosurg 11:1611721954

  • 39

    Spektor SAnderson GJMcMenomey SOHorgan MAKellogg JXDelashaw JB Jr: Quantitative description of the far-lateral transcondylar transtubercular approach to the foramen magnum and clivus. J Neurosurg 92:8248312000

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Stein BMLeeds NETaveras JMPool JL: Meningiomas of the foramen magnum. J Neurosurg 20:7407511963

  • 41

    Vishteh AGCrawford NRMelton MSSpetzler RFSonntag VKDickman CA: Stability of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral occipital condyle resection: a biomechanical study. J Neurosurg 90:1 Suppl91981999

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    White AA IIIPanjabi MM: Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine ed 2PhiladelphiaLippincott Williams & Wilkins1990

  • 43

    Wu GSiegler SAllard PKirtley CLeardini ARosenbaum D: ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech 35:5435482002

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Wu ZHao SZhang JZhang LJia GTang J: Foramen magnum meningiomas: experiences in 114 patients at a single institute over 15 years. Surg Neurol 72:3763822009

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Zdeblick TAZou DWarden KEMcCabe RKunz DVanderby R: Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:22271992

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 41 41 12
Full Text Views 253 253 1
PDF Downloads 193 193 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar