The far lateral transcondylar approach to the ventral foramen magnum requires partial resection of the occipital condyle. Early biomechanical studies suggest that occipitocervical (OC) fusion should be considered if 50% of the condyle is resected. In clinical practice, however, a joint-sparing condylectomy has often been employed without the need for OC fusion. The biomechanics of the joint-sparing technique have not been reported. Authors of the present study hypothesized that the clinically relevant joint-sparing condylectomy would result in added stability of the craniovertebral junction as compared with earlier reports.
Multidirectional in vitro flexibility tests were performed using a robotic spine-testing system on 7 fresh cadaveric spines to assess the effect of sequential unilateral joint-sparing condylectomy (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%) in comparison with the intact state by using cardinal direction and coupled moments combined with a simulated head weight “follower load.”
The percent change in range of motion following sequential condylectomy as compared with the intact state was 5.2%, 8.1%, 12.0%, and 27.5% in flexion-extension (FE); 8.4%, 14.7%, 39.1%, and 80.2% in lateral bending (LB); and 24.4%, 31.5%, 49.9%, and 141.1% in axial rotation (AR). Only values at 100% condylectomy were statistically significant (p < 0.05). With coupled motions, however, −3.9%, 6.6%, 35.8%, and 142.4% increases in AR+F and 27.3%, 32.7%, 77.5%, and 175.5% increases in AR+E were found. Values for 75% and 100% condyle resection were statistically significant in AR+E.
When tested in the traditional cardinal directions, a 50% joint-sparing condylectomy did not significantly increase motion. However, removing 75% of the condyle may necessitate fusion, as a statistically significant increase in motion was found when E was coupled with AR. Clinical correlation is ultimately needed to determine the need for OC fusion.
ABBREVIATIONSAR = axial rotation; CVJ = craniovertebral junction; FE = flexion-extension; HWL = head weight load; LB = lateral bending; O = occiput; OC = occipitocervical; ROM = range of motion; SOC+C1 = suboccipital craniectomy with C-1 laminectomy.
BassiouniHNtoukasVAsgariSSandalciogluEIStolkeDSeifertV: Foramen magnum meningiomas: clinical outcome after microsurgical resection via a posterolateral suboccipital retrocondylar approach. Neurosurgery59:1177–11872006
BertalanffyH, SeegerW: The dorsolateral, suboccipital, transcondylar approach to the lower clivus and anterior portion of the craniocervical junction. 29:815–821, 1991175859010.1227/00006123-199112000-00002)| false
BruneauM, GeorgeB: Foramen magnum meningiomas: detailed surgical approaches and technical aspects at Lariboisière Hospital and review of the literature. 31:19–33, 20081788245910.1007/s10143-007-0097-1)| false
ChotaiS, KshettryVR, AmmiratiM: Endoscopic-assisted microsurgical techniques at the craniovertebral junction: 4 illustrative cases and literature review. 121:1–9, 20142479346510.1016/j.clineuro.2014.03.004)| false
GeorgeB, DematonsC, CophignonJ: Lateral approach to the anterior portion of the foramen magnum. Application to surgical removal of 14 benign tumors: technical note. 29:484–490, 1988337597810.1016/0090-3019(88)90145-0)| false
KshettryVRChotaiSChenWZhangJAmmiratiM: Quantitative analysis of the effect of brainstem shift on surgical approaches to anterolateral tumors at the craniovertebral junction. J Clin Neurosci21:644–6502014
KshettryVR, ChotaiS, ChenW, ZhangJ, AmmiratiM: Quantitative analysis of the effect of brainstem shift on surgical approaches to anterolateral tumors at the craniovertebral junction. 21:644–650, 201410.1016/j.jocn.2013.08.00324290905)| false
KshettryVR, ChotaiS, HouJ, LamkiT, AmmiratiM: Successful resection of anterior and anterolateral lesions at the craniovertebral junction using a simple posterolateral approach. 21:616–622, 201410.1016/j.jocn.2013.06.01024210804)| false
LittleASPerez-OrriboLRodriguez-MartinezNGReyesPMNewcombAGPrevedelloDM: Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after inferior-third clivectomy and intradural exposure of the foramen magnum: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base. J Neurosurg Spine18:327–3322013
LittleAS, Perez-OrriboL, Rodriguez-MartinezNG, ReyesPM, NewcombAG, PrevedelloDM, : Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after inferior-third clivectomy and intradural exposure of the foramen magnum: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base. 18:327–332, 201310.3171/2013.1.SPINE1283523414005)| false
MullanS, NauntonR, Hekmat-PanahJ, VailatiG: The use of an anterior approach to ventrally placed tumors in the foramen magnum and vertebral column. 24:536–543, 196610.3171/jns.1966.24.2.05365935381)| false
MuthukumarN, SwaminathanR, VenkateshG, BhanumathySP: A morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum region as it relates to the transcondylar approach. 147:889–895, 20051592420810.1007/s00701-005-0555-x)| false
NandaA, VincentDA, VannemreddyPS, BaskayaMK, ChandaA: Far-lateral approach to intradural lesions of the foramen magnum without resection of the occipital condyle. 96:302–309, 200210.3171/jns.2002.96.2.030211841072)| false
Perez-OrriboLLittleASLefevreRDReyesPRNewcombAGPrevedelloDM: Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after anterior unilateral condylectomy: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base. Neurosurgery72:1021–10302013
Perez-OrriboL, LittleAS, LefevreRD, ReyesPR, NewcombAG, PrevedelloDM, : Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after anterior unilateral condylectomy: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base. 72:1021–1030, 20132344251310.1227/NEU.0b013e31828d6231)| false
SpektorSAndersonGJMcMenomeySOHorganMAKelloggJXDelashawJBJr: Quantitative description of the far-lateral transcondylar transtubercular approach to the foramen magnum and clivus. J Neurosurg92:824–8312000
SpektorS, AndersonGJ, McMenomeySO, HorganMA, KelloggJX, DelashawJBJr: Quantitative description of the far-lateral transcondylar transtubercular approach to the foramen magnum and clivus. 92:824–831, 20001079429710.3171/jns.2000.92.5.0824)| false
WuGSieglerSAllardPKirtleyCLeardiniARosenbaumD: ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech35:543–5482002
WuG, SieglerS, AllardP, KirtleyC, LeardiniA, RosenbaumD, : ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. 35:543–548, 20021193442610.1016/S0021-9290(01)00222-6)| false