The aim of this study was to determine the most effective electrode montage to elicit lower-extremity transcranial motor evoked potentials (LE-tMEPs) using a minimum stimulation current.
A realistic 3D head model was created from T1-weighted images. Finite element methods were used to visualize the electric field in the brain, which was generated by transcranial electrical stimulation via 4 electrode montage models. The stimulation threshold level of LE-tMEPs in 52 patients was also studied in a practical clinical setting to determine the effects of each electrode montage.
The electric field in the brain radially diffused from the brain surface at a maximum just below the electrodes in the finite element models. The Cz-inion electrode montage generated a centrally distributed high electric field with a current direction longitudinal and parallel to most of the pyramidal tract fibers of the lower extremity. These features seemed to be effective in igniting LE-tMEPs.
Threshold level recordings of LE-tMEPs revealed that the Cz-inion electrode montage had a lower threshold on average than the C3–C4 montage, 76.5 ± 20.6 mA and 86.2 ± 20.6 mA, respectively (31 patients, t = 4.045, p < 0.001, paired t-test). In 23 (74.2%) of 31 cases, the Cz-inion montage could elicit LE-tMEPs at a lower threshold than C3–C4.
The C3–C4 and C1–C2 electrode montages are the standard for tMEP monitoring in neurosurgery, but the Cz-inion montage showed lower thresholds for the generation of LE-tMEPs. The Cz-inion electrode montage should be a good alternative for LE-tMEP monitoring when the C3–C4 has trouble igniting LE-tMEPs.
INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online September 23, 2016; DOI: 10.3171/2016.7.JNS16643.Correspondence Ryosuke Tomio, Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan. email: email@example.com.
ChenXSterioDMingXParaDDButusovaMTongT: Success rate of motor evoked potentials for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: effects of age, lesion location, and preoperative neurologic deficits. J Clin Neurophysiol24:281–2852007
HernJEC, LandgrenS, PhillipsCG, PorterR: Selective excitation of corticofugal neurones by surface-anodal stimulation of the baboon's motor cortex. 161:73–90, 196210.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp00687413906736)| false
MotoyamaYKawaguchiMYamadaSNakagawaINishimuraFHironakaY: Evaluation of combined use of transcranial and direct cortical motor evoked potential monitoring during unruptured aneurysm surgery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)51:15–222011
MotoyamaY, KawaguchiM, YamadaS, NakagawaI, NishimuraF, HironakaY, : Evaluation of combined use of transcranial and direct cortical motor evoked potential monitoring during unruptured aneurysm surgery. 51:15–22, 20112127373910.2176/nmc.51.15)| false
RothwellJ, BurkeD, HicksR, StephenJ, WoodforthI, CrawfordM: Transcranial electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in man: further evidence for the site of activation. 481:243–250, 1994785324710.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020435)| false
SzelényiA, Bueno de CamargoA, FlammE, DeletisV: Neurophysiological criteria for intraoperative prediction of pure motor hemiplegia during aneurysm surgery. Case report. 99:575–578, 200310.3171/jns.2003.99.3.057512959448)| false
SzelényiAHattingenEWeidauerSSeifertVZiemannU: Intraoperative motor evoked potential alteration in intracranial tumor surgery and its relation to signal alteration in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery67:302–3132010
SzelényiA, HattingenE, WeidauerS, SeifertV, ZiemannU: Intraoperative motor evoked potential alteration in intracranial tumor surgery and its relation to signal alteration in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. 67:302–313, 20102064441510.1227/01.NEU.0000371973.46234.46)| false
SzelényiALangerDKothbauerKDe CamargoABFlammESDeletisV: Monitoring of muscle motor evoked potentials during cerebral aneurysm surgery: intraoperative changes and postoperative outcome. J Neurosurg105:675–6812006
SzelényiA, LangerD, KothbauerK, De CamargoAB, FlammES, DeletisV: Monitoring of muscle motor evoked potentials during cerebral aneurysm surgery: intraoperative changes and postoperative outcome. 105:675–681, 20061712112710.3171/jns.2006.105.5.675)| false
TomioRAkiyamaTHorikoshiTOhiraTYoshidaK: Visualization of the electric field evoked by transcranial electric stimulation during a craniotomy using the finite element method. J Neurosci Methods256:157–1672015
TomioR, AkiyamaT, HorikoshiT, OhiraT, YoshidaK: Visualization of the electric field evoked by transcranial electric stimulation during a craniotomy using the finite element method. 256:157–167, 20152639177410.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.09.014)| false
UkegawaDKawabataSSakakiKIshiiSTomizawaSInoseH: Efficacy of biphasic transcranial electric stimulation in intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)39:E159–E1652014
UkegawaD, KawabataS, SakakiK, IshiiS, TomizawaS, InoseH, : Efficacy of biphasic transcranial electric stimulation in intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring for cervical compression myelopathy. 39:E159–E165, 2014)| false
WatanabeKWatanabeTTakahashiASaitoNHiratoMSasakiT: Transcranial electrical stimulation through screw electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials. Technical note. J Neurosurg100:155–1602004