The comparative effectiveness of the 2 treatment options—surgical clipping and endovascular coiling—for unruptured cerebral aneurysms remains an issue of debate and has not been studied in clinical trials. The authors investigated the association between treatment method for unruptured cerebral aneurysms and outcomes in elderly patients.
The authors performed a cohort study of 100% of Medicare fee-for-service claims data for elderly patients who had treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms between 2007 and 2012. To control for measured confounding, the authors used propensity score conditioning and inverse probability weighting with mixed effects to account for clustering at the level of the hospital referral region (HRR). An instrumental variable (regional rates of coiling) analysis was used to control for unmeasured confounding and to create pseudo-randomization on the treatment method.
During the study period, 8705 patients underwent treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms and met the study inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 2585 (29.7%) had surgical clipping and 6120 (70.3%) had endovascular coiling. Instrumental variable analysis demonstrated no difference between coiling and clipping in 1-year postoperative mortality (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.68–2.31) or 90-day readmission rate (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.66–1.62). However, clipping was associated with a greater likelihood of discharge to rehabilitation (OR 6.39, 95% CI 3.85–10.59) and 3.6 days longer length of stay (LOS; 95% CI 2.90–4.71). The same associations were present in propensity score–adjusted and inverse probability–weighted models.
In a cohort of Medicare patients, there was no difference in mortality and the readmission rate between clipping and coiling of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Clipping was associated with a higher rate of discharge to a rehabilitation facility and a longer LOS.
ABBREVIATIONSAD = adjusted difference; FFS = fee-for-service; HRR = hospital referral region; IPW = inverse probability weighting; ISAT = International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial; IV = instrumental variable; LOS = length of stay; ZIP = Zone Improvement Plan.
BarkerFGIIAmin-HanjaniSButlerWEHohBLRabinovJDPryorJC: Age-dependent differences in short-term outcome after surgical or endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 1996–2000. Neurosurgery54:18–302004
BekelisKVariation in the care of surgical conditions: cerebral aneurysms. GoodneyRPDzebisashviliNGoodmanDC: Variations in the Care of Surgical Conditions: A Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care SeriesLebanon, NHDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice2014
BrilstraEHRinkelGJvan der GraafYSluzewskiMGroenRJLoRT: Quality of life after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms by neurosurgical clipping or by embolisation with coils. A prospective, observational study. Cerebrovasc Dis17:44–522004
BrinjikjiWRabinsteinAALanzinoGKallmesDFCloftHJ: Patient outcomes are better for unruptured cerebral aneurysms treated at centers that preferentially treat with endovascular coiling: a study of the National Inpatient Sample 2001–2007. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol32:1065–10702011
DuanYBlackhamKNelsonJSelmanWBambakidisN: Analysis of short-term total hospital costs and current primary cost drivers of coiling versus clipping for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg7:614–6182015
FargenKMRahmanMNealDHohBL: Prevalence of patient safety indicators and hospital-acquired conditions in those treated for unruptured cerebral aneurysms: establishing standard performance measures using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. J Neurosurg119:966–9732013
GerlachRBeckJSetzerMVatterHBerkefeldJDu Mesnil de RochemontR: Treatment related morbidity of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: results of a prospective single centre series with an interdisciplinary approach over a 6 year period (1999–2005). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry78:864–8712007
HohBLChiYYDermottMALiporiPJLewisSB: The effect of coiling versus clipping of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms on length of stay, hospital cost, hospital reimbursement, and surgeon reimbursement at the university of Florida. Neurosurgery64:614–6212009
HohBLChiYYLawsonMFMoccoJBarkerFGII: Length of stay and total hospital charges of clipping versus coiling for ruptured and unruptured adult cerebral aneurysms in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database 2002 to 2006. Stroke41:337–3422010
JohnstonKGustafsonPLevyARGrootendorstP: Use of instrumental variables in the analysis of generalized linear models in the presence of unmeasured confounding with applications to epidemiological research. Stat Med27:1539–15562008
LawsonMFNealDWMoccoJHohBL: Rationale for treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms: actuarial analysis of natural history risk versus treatment risk for coiling or clipping based on 14,050 patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. World Neurosurg79:472–4782013
MacKenzieTATostesonTDMordenNEStukelTAO'MalleyAJ: Using instrumental variables to estimate a Cox's proportional hazards regression subject to additive confounding. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol14:54–682014
MolyneuxAKerrRStrattonISandercockPClarkeMShrimptonJ: International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet360:1267–12742002
QureshiAIChaudhrySATekleWGSuriMF: Comparison of long-term outcomes associated with endovascular treatment vs surgical treatment among Medicare beneficiaries with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery75:380–3872014
QureshiAIVazquezGTariqNSuriMFLakshminarayanKLanzinoG: Impact of International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial results on treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States. Clinical article. J Neurosurg114:834–8412011
SharmaMBrownBMadhugiriVCuellar-SaenzHSonigAAmbekarS: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: comparison of perioperative complications, discharge disposition, outcome, and effect of calcification, between clipping and coiling: a single institution experience. Neurol India61:270–2762013