Erratum: Interpretation of the causes of instability of flash visual evoked potentials in intraoperative monitoring and proposal of a recording method for reliable functional monitoring of visual evoked potentials using a light-emitting device

Free access

An error appeared in the article by Sato (Sato A: Interpretation of the causes of instability of flash visual evoked potentials in intraoperative monitoring and proposal of a recording method for reliable functional monitoring of visual evoked potentials using a light-emitting device. J Neurosurg [epub ahead of print February 19, 2016; DOI: 10.3171/2015.10.JNS151228]).

Figure 5 was incorrect. The correct figure is shown here.

FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The upper graphs show correlations between the peak latency during the light emission time and each peak latency. The left 3 graphs are data for the off response, and the right 3 graphs are data for the on response. The off response was analyzed by Mann-Whitney tests relative to 800 msec. The on response was analyzed by Mann-Whitney tests relative to 200 msec. The lower graphs show correlations between the peak latency and the emission quantity. The off response was analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test relative to 50%. The on response was analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test relative to 100%. ms = msec. *p < 0.0083. **p < 0.025.

The article has been corrected online as of July 29, 2016.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Article Information

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online July 29, 2016; DOI: 10.3171/2016.7.JNS151228a.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Figures

  • View in gallery

    The upper graphs show correlations between the peak latency during the light emission time and each peak latency. The left 3 graphs are data for the off response, and the right 3 graphs are data for the on response. The off response was analyzed by Mann-Whitney tests relative to 800 msec. The on response was analyzed by Mann-Whitney tests relative to 200 msec. The lower graphs show correlations between the peak latency and the emission quantity. The off response was analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test relative to 50%. The on response was analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test relative to 100%. ms = msec. *p < 0.0083. **p < 0.025.

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 151 137 10
PDF Downloads 207 187 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar