Predictors of infection after 754 cranioplasty operations and the value of intraoperative cultures for cryopreserved bone flaps

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

The authors' aim was to report the largest study on predictors of infection after cranioplasty and to assess the predictive value of intraoperative bone flap cultures before cryopreservation.

METHODS

They retrospectively examined all cranioplasties performed between March 2004 and November 2014. Throughout this study period, the standard protocol during initial craniectomy was to obtain a culture swab of the extracted autologous bone flap (ABF)—prior to its placement in cytostorage—to screen for microbial contamination. Two consecutive protocols were employed for the use and interpretation of the intraoperative swab culture results: A) From March 2004 through June 2013, any culture-positive ABF (+ABF) was discarded and a custom synthetic prosthesis was implanted at the time of cranioplasty. B) From July 2013 through November 2014, any ABF with a skin flora organism was not discarded. Instead, cryopreservation was maintained and the +ABF was reimplanted after a 10-minute soak in bacitracin irrigation as well as a 3-minute soak in betadine.

RESULTS

Over the 10.75-year period, 754 cranioplasty procedures were performed. The median time from craniectomy to cranioplasty was 123 days. Median follow-up after cranioplasty was 237 days for protocol A and 225 days for protocol B. The overall infection rate after cranioplasty was 6.6% (50 cases) occurring at a median postoperative Day 31. Staphylococcus spp. were involved as the causative organisms in 60% of cases.

Culture swabs taken at the time of initial craniectomy were available for 640 ABFs as 114 ABFs were not salvageable. One hundred twenty-six (20%) were culture positive. Eighty-nine +ABFs occurred during protocol A and were discarded in favor of a synthetic prosthesis at the time of cranioplasty, whereas 37 +ABFs occurred under protocol B and were reimplanted at the time of cranioplasty.

Cranioplasty material did not affect the postcranioplasty infection rate. There was no significant difference in the infection rate among sterile ABFs (7%), +ABFs (8%), and synthetic prostheses (5.5%; p = 0.425). All 3 +ABF infections under protocol B were caused by organisms that differed from those in the original intraoperative bone culture from the initial craniectomy. A cranioplasty procedure ≤ 14 days after initial craniectomy was the only significant predictor of postcranioplasty infection (p = 0.007, HR 3.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Cranioplasty procedures should be performed at least 14 days after initial craniectomy to minimize infection risk. Obtaining intraoperative bone cultures at the time of craniectomy in the absence of clinical infection should be discontinued as the culture results were not a useful predictor of postcranioplasty infection and led to the unnecessary use of synthetic prostheses and increased health care costs.

ABBREVIATIONSABF = autologous bone flap; +ABF = culture-positive ABF; PEEK = polyetheretherketone; TBI = traumatic brain injury.

Article Information

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online January 15, 2016; DOI: 10.3171/2015.8.JNS151390.

Correspondence Ryan P. Morton, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, 325 9th Ave., Box 359924, Seattle, WA 98104. email: rymorton@gmail.com.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

References

1

Bender AHeulin SRöhrer SMehrkens JHHeidecke VStraube A: Early cranioplasty may improve outcome in neurological patients with decompressive craniectomy. Brain Inj 27:107310792013

2

Bhaskar IPITInglis TJBowman JLee GY: Microbial contamination assessment of cryostored autogenous cranial bone flaps: should bone biopsies or swabs be performed?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155:3673712013

3

Bruce JNBSBruce SS: Preservation of bone flaps in patients with postcraniotomy infections. J Neurosurg 98:120312072003

4

Chang VHartzfeld PLanglois MMahmood ASeyfried D: Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. J Neurosurg 112:112011242010

5

Chiang HYSVSteelman VMPottinger JMSchlueter AJDiekema DJGreenlee JD: Clinical significance of positive cranial bone flap cultures and associated risk of surgical site infection after craniotomies or craniectomies. J Neurosurg 114:174617542011

6

Chibbaro SDi Rocco FMirone GFricia MMakiese ODi Emidio P: Decompressive craniectomy and early cranioplasty for the management of severe head injury: a prospective multicenter study on 147 patients. World Neurosurg 75:5585622011

7

Cong ZSXZhang LZhao DZhou XYi CShao Y: Early cranioplasty improved rehabilitation in patients with traumatic skull injuries. Neurosurg Q [epub ahead of print]2014

8

De Bonis PFrassanito PMangiola ANucci CGAnile CPompucci A: Cranial repair: how complicated is filling a “hole”?. J Neurotrauma 29:107110762012

9

Gooch MRGGGin GEKenning TJGerman JW: Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Focus 26:6E92009

10

Grossman NShemesh-Jan HSMerkin VGideon MCohen A: Deep-freeze preservation of cranial bones for future cranioplasty: nine years of experience in Soroka University Medical Center. Cell Tissue Bank 8:2432462007

11

Honeybul SJanzen CKruger KHo KM: The impact of cranioplasty on neurological function. Br J Neurosurg 27:6366412013

12

Iwama TYamada JImai SShinoda JFunakoshi TSakai N: The use of frozen autogenous bone flaps in delayed cranioplasty revisited. Neurosurgery 52:5915962003

13

Jho DHNSNeckrysh SHardman JCharbel FTAmin-Hanjani S: Ethylene oxide gas sterilization: a simple technique for storing explanted skull bone. Technical note. J Neurosurg 107:4404452007

14

Kriegel RJSCSchaller CClusmann H: Cranioplasty for large skull defects with PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) or Tutoplast processed autogenic bone grafts. Zentralbl Neurochir 68:1821892007

15

Liang WXiaofeng YWeiguo LGang SXuesheng ZFei C: Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma. J Craniofac Surg 18:5265322007

16

Liao CCKMKao MC: Cranioplasty for patients with severe depressed skull bone defect after cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Clin Neurosci 9:5535552002

17

Lu YHui GLiu FWang ZTang YGao S: Survival and regeneration of deep-freeze preserved autologous cranial bones after cranioplasty. Br J Neurosurg 26:2162212012

18

Morina AKelmendi FMorina QDragusha SAhmeti FMorina D: Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts in abdominal wall—Experience with 75 cases in a post-war country Kosova. Surg Neurol Int 2:722011

19

Movassaghi KVer Halen JGanchi PAmin-Hanjani SMesa JYaremchuk MJ: Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2022062006

20

Piedra MPTEThompson EMSelden NRRagel BTGuillaume DJ: Optimal timing of autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 10:2682722012

21

Rosenthal GNg IMoscovici SLee KKLay TMartin C: Polyetheretherketone implants for the repair of large cranial defects: a 3-center experience. Neurosurgery 75:5235292014

22

Sobani ZASMShamim MSZafar SNQadeer MBilal NMurtaza SG: Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: An institutional audit and analysis of factors related to complications. Surg Neurol Int 2:1232011

23

Staffa GNataloni ACompagnone CServadei F: Custom made cranioplasty prostheses in porous hydroxyapatite using 3D design techniques: 7 years experience in 25 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 149:1611702007

24

Stephens FLMCMossop CMBell RSTigno T JrRosner MKKumar A: Cranioplasty complications following wartime decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurg Focus 28:5E32010

25

Walcott BPKCKwon CSSheth SAFehnel CRKoffie RMAsaad WF: Predictors of cranioplasty complications in stroke and trauma patients. J Neurosurg 118:7577622013

26

Wiggins AAusterberry RMorrison DHo KMHoneybul S: Cranioplasty with custom-made titanium plates—14 years experience. Neurosurgery 72:2482562013

27

Wurm GTomancok BHoll KTrenkler J: Prospective study on cranioplasty with individual carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) implants produced by means of stereolithography. Surg Neurol 62:5105212004

28

Yadla SCampbell PGChitale RMaltenfort MGJabbour PSharan AD: Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 68:112411302011

29

Zanaty MChalouhi NStarke RMClark SWBovenzi CDSaigh M: Complications following cranioplasty: incidence and predictors in 348 cases. J Neurosurg 123:1821882015

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 540 540 381
Full Text Views 1373 1373 40
PDF Downloads 182 182 9
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar