Resolution of cranial neuropathies following treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device
Clinical article
Search for other papers by Karam Moon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Felipe C. Albuquerque in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andrew F. Ducruet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R. Webster Crowley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cameron G. McDougall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Object
Intracranial aneurysms, especially those of the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA), can present with cranial nerve (CN) palsies. The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has demonstrated safety and efficacy in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms by flow diversion, but little data exist reporting the outcomes of cranial neuropathies following treatment with the device.
Methods
The prospectively maintained Barrow Neurological Institute's endovascular database was reviewed for all patients treated with the PED after presenting with one or more CN palsies secondary to a cerebral aneurysm since May 2011. Patient charts and digital subtraction angiograms were reviewed to report clinical and angiographic outcomes. Only patients with clinical follow-up were included in the analysis.
Results
A total of 127 patients were treated with the PED at the authors' institution after FDA approval. Twentytwo patients presented with cranial neuropathies, for initial inclusion in this study. Of these, 20 had sufficient followup for analysis. Cranial neuropathies included those of CN II, III, V, and VI, with presenting symptoms of diplopia, decreased visual acuity, and facial numbness and/or pain. Thirteen lesions were cavernous segment ICA aneurysms, whereas the remainder included supraclinoid and petrous segment ICA, posterior communicating artery, and basilar trunk aneurysms. At an average clinical follow-up of 9.55 months, 15 patients (75%) had resolution or significant improvement of their cranial neuropathies, and the remaining 5 had stable symptoms. Of the 18 patients with angiographic follow-up, 12 (66.7%) demonstrated complete obliteration or small neck residual, whereas 6 (33.3%) had residual lesion. Patients with complete or near-complete obliteration of their lesion were significantly more likely to demonstrate symptomatic improvement at follow-up (p = 0.009). Two patients with persistent symptoms were eventually treated with microsurgical bypass. Transient complications in this series included 6 (30%) extracranial hemorrhagic complications related to dual-antiplatelet therapy, all of which were managed medically. There was 1 delayed right ICA occlusion following retreatment that led to microsurgical bypass.
Conclusions
Intracranial aneurysms presenting with one or more CN palsies show a high rate of clinical improvement after treatment with the PED. Clinical outcomes must be weighed against the risks and challenges faced with flow diverters. Further research is warranted for patients whose symptoms do not respond optimally to device placement.
Abbreviations used in this paper:
CN = cranial nerve; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; ICA = internal carotid artery; MCA = middle cerebral artery; MRA = MR angiography; PCoA = posterior communicating artery; PED = Pipeline Embolization Device; STA = superficial temporal artery.
© Copyright 1944-2023 American Association of Neurological Surgeons