Determining the elements of procedural quality

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

The definition and determination of quality health care is an important topic. The purpose of this study was to develop a longitudinal method to define a quality procedure by creating a formal approach to pre- and postoperative outcomes documentation. The authors worked to define quality outcomes by first documenting the patient's condition. Goals were determined together by the surgeon and the patient and then were evaluated to see if those goals were met.

Methods

The population consisted of cancer patients with newly diagnosed metastatic brain disease who were scheduled to undergo stereotactic radiosurgery. Surgeons recorded perioperatively objective information related to preoperative goals, clinical findings, surgical performance and/or error, and whether goals were met. In addition, patients completed pre- and postprocedure questionnaires (Rand 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey 1.0 [SF-36]).

Results

Procedural goals, defined as completing radiosurgery without error or complication and same-day discharge, were met in all patients. The clinically predetermined goal of tumor palliation was met in all but 1 patient at follow-up. The SF-36 scores remained stable except for the general health domain, which was lower (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Procedural goals can be defined and objectively measured serially. The authors think that quality care can be defined as a process that achieves predefined goals without significant error and maintains or improves health.

Abbreviations used in this paper:GKS = Gamma Knife surgery; QOL = quality of life; SF-36 = Rand 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey 1.0; WBRT = whole-brain radiation therapy.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Douglas Kondziolka, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York University, 530 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016. email: douglas.kondziolka@nyumc.org.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online February 8, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.1.JNS111681.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Bar graph showing baseline (gray bars) and follow-up (black bars) normalized SF-36 scores in each of the 8 measured domains.

  • View in gallery

    Scheme for tracking and scoring procedures. Provides a relative value for occurrences in each aspect of care. ↑ = extended.

References

1

Addeo RCaraglia MFaiola VCapasso EVincenzi BMontella L: Concomitant treatment of brain metastasis with whole brain radiotherapy [WBRT] and temozolomide [TMZ] is active and improves quality of life. BMC Cancer 7:182007

2

American Society of Health-System Pharmacists: ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. american society of health-system pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm 56:183918881999

3

Ball AERussell EMSeymour DGPrimrose WRGarratt AM: Problems in using health survey questionnaires in older patients with physical disabilities. Can proxies be used to complete the SF-36?. Gerontology 47:3343402001

4

Bosma IReijneveld JCDouw LVos MJPostma TJAaronson NK: Health-related quality of life of long-term high-grade glioma survivors. Neuro Oncol 11:51582009

5

Bratzler DWHouck PM: Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Am J Surg 189:3954042005

6

Caprini JAArcelus JIHasty JHTamhane ACFabrega F: Clinical assessment of venous thromboembolic risk in surgical patients. Semin Thromb Hemost 17:Suppl 33043121991

7

Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences ed 2Hillsdale, NJRoutledge Academic1988

8

Davies SMGeppert JMcClellan MMcDonald KMRomano PSShojania KG: Refinement of the HCUP Quality Indicators. Technical Reviews No. 4 Rockville, MDAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality2001

9

Dekkers OMBiermasz NRSmit JWGroot LERoelfsema FRomijn JA: Quality of life in treated adult craniopharyngioma patients. Eur J Endocrinol 154:4834892006

10

Donabedian A: Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. Milbank Q 83:6917292005

11

Frič REide PK: The presigmoid approach for removal of tumours causing ventral compression of the brainstem. Surgical results and postoperative quality of life. Br J Neurosurg 25:86932011

12

Gabrovski NVanev PKrŭstev EUzunov KMaslarov DGabrovski S: [Quality of life assessment in patients with malignant glial tumors.]. Khirurgiia (Sofiia) 24292008. (Bulgarian)

13

Gazzotti MRMalheiros SMBatan Alith MNascimento OSantoro ILJardim JR: Quality of life and physical limitations in primary brain tumor patients. Qual Life Res 20:163916432011

14

Geerts WHPineo GFHeit JABergqvist DLassen MRColwell CW: Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 126:3 Suppl338S400S2004

15

Hamilton MGHull RDPineo GF: Venous thromboembolism in neurosurgery and neurology patients: a review. Neurosurgery 34:2802961994

16

Hays RDSherbourne CDMazel RM: The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ 2:2172271993

17

Ingraham AMRichards KEHall BLKo CY: Quality improvement in surgery: the American College Of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach. Adv Surg 44:2512672010

18

Karabatsou KO'Kelly CGanna ADehdashti ARGentili F: Outcomes and quality of life assessment in patients undergoing endoscopic surgery for pituitary adenomas. Br J Neurosurg 22:6306352008

19

Lamperti EPantaleo GFinocchiaro CYSilvani ABotturi AGaviani P: Recurrent brain tumour: the impact of illness on patient's life. Support Care Cancer 20:132713322012

20

Linskey MEAndrews DWAsher ALBurri SHKondziolka DRobinson PD: The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol 96:45682010

21

Mehta MPTsao MNWhelan TJMorris DEHayman JAFlickinger JC: The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based review of the role of radiosurgery for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:37462005

22

Möller ASartipy U: Long-term health-related quality of life following surgery for lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41:3623672012

23

Muacevic AWowra BSiefert ATonn JCSteiger HJKreth FW: Microsurgery plus whole brain irradiation versus Gamma Knife surgery alone for treatment of single metastases to the brain: a randomized controlled multicentre phase III trial. J Neurooncol 87:2993072008

24

Novella JLJochum CAnkri JMorrone IJolly DBlanchard F: Measuring general health status in dementia: practical and methodological issues in using the SF-36. Aging (Milano) 13:3623692001

25

Pinar R: Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 14:2592642005

26

Prospero EBarbadoro PMarigliano AMartini ED'Errico MM: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis: Improved compliance and impact on infection rates. Epidemiol Infect 139:132613312011

27

Roos D: What is the randomised evidence for surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with solitary (or few) brain metastases?. Int J Evid-Based Healthc 9:61662011

28

Samsa GEdelman DRothman MLWilliams GRLipscomb JMatchar D: Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II. Pharmacoeconomics 15:1411551999

29

Stafinski TJhangri GSYan EMenon D: Effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery alone or in combination with whole brain radiotherapy compared to conventional surgery and/or whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of one or more brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 32:2032132006

30

Walters SJ: Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:262004

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 196 196 59
Full Text Views 170 170 5
PDF Downloads 170 170 10
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar