Reliability of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using motor evoked potentials during resection of metastases in motor-eloquent brain regions

Clinical article

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurosurgery and
  • 2 Anesthesiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

Resection of gliomas in or adjacent to the motor system is widely performed using intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM). For resection of cerebral metastases in motor-eloquent regions, however, data are sparse and IOM in such cases is not yet widely described. Since recent studies have shown that cerebral metastases infiltrate surrounding brain tissue, this study was undertaken to assess the value and influence of IOM during resection of supratentorial metastases in motor-eloquent regions.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2011, the authors resected 206 consecutive supratentorial metastases, including 56 in eloquent motor areas with monitoring of monopolar direct cortically stimulated motor evoked potentials (MEPs). The authors evaluated the relationship between the monitoring data and the course of surgery, clinical data, and postoperative imaging.

Results

Motor evoked potential monitoring was successful in 53 cases (93%). Reduction of MEP amplitude correlated better with postoperative outcomes when the threshold for significant amplitude reduction was set at 80% (only > 80% reduction was considered significant decline) than when it was set at 50% (> 50% amplitude reduction was considered significant decline). Evidence of residual tumor was seen on MR images in 28% of the cases with significant MEP reduction. No residual tumor was seen in any case of stable MEP monitoring. Moreover, preoperative motor deficit, recursive partitioning analysis Class 3, and preoperative radiotherapy were independent risk factors for a new surgery-related motor weakness (occurring in 64% of patients with and 11% of patients without radiotherapy, p > 0.01).

Conclusions

Continuous MEP monitoring provides reliable monitoring of the motor system and also influences the course of operation in resection of cerebral metastases. However, in establishing warning criteria, only an amplitude decline > 80% of the baseline should be considered significant.

Abbreviations used in this paper:CMAP = compound muscle action potential; IOM = intraoperative monitoring; MEP = motor evoked potential.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Florian Ringel, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, Munich 81675, Germany. email: Florian.Ringel@lrz.tum.de.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online March 22, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.2.JNS121752.

  • 1

    Amassian VE, , Stewart M, , Quirk GJ, & Rosenthal JL: Physiological basis of motor effects of a transient stimulus to cerebral cortex. Neurosurgery 20:7493, 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Ammirati M, , Cobbs CS, , Linskey ME, , Paleologos NA, , Ryken TC, & Burri SH, : The role of retreatment in the management of recurrent/progressive brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol 96:8596, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Buchmann N, , Gempt J, , Stoffel M, , Foerschler A, , Meyer B, & Ringel F: Utility of diffusion tensor-imaged (DTI) motor fiber tracking for the resection of intracranial tumors near the corticospinal tract. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:6874, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Cedzich C, , Taniguchi M, , Schäfer S, & Schramm J: Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery 38:962970, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Deletis V: Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathways. Adv Neurol 63:201214, 1993

  • 6

    Duffau H, , Lopes M, , Arthuis F, , Bitar A, , Sichez JP, & Van Effenterre R, : Contribution of intraoperative electrical stimulations in surgery of low grade gliomas: a comparative study between two series without (1985–96) and with (1996–2003) functional mapping in the same institution. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:845851, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Ewend MG, , Morris DE, , Carey LA, , Ladha AM, & Brem S: Guidelines for the initial management of metastatic brain tumors: role of surgery, radiosurgery, and radiation therapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 6:505514, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Gaspar L, , Scott C, , Rotman M, , Asbell S, , Phillips T, & Wasserman T, : Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:745751, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kalkanis SN, , Kondziolka D, , Gaspar LE, , Burri SH, , Asher AL, & Cobbs CS, : The role of surgical resection in the management of newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol 96:3343, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kombos T, , Picht T, , Derdilopoulos A, & Suess O: Impact of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring on surgery of high-grade gliomas. J Clin Neurophysiol 26:422425, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Kombos T, , Suess O, , Ciklatekerlio O, & Brock M: Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 95:608614, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Kombos T, , Suess O, , Funk T, , Kern BC, & Brock M: Intra-operative mapping of the motor cortex during surgery in and around the motor cortex. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 142:263268, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Krieg SM, , Buchmann NH, , Gempt J, , Shiban E, , Meyer B, & Ringel F: Diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking using navigated brain stimulation—a feasibility study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:555563, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Krieg SM, , Shiban E, , Buchmann N, , Gempt J, , Foerschler A, & Meyer B, : Utility of presurgical navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation for the resection of tumors in eloquent motor areas. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 116:9941001, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Krieg SM, , Shiban E, , Droese D, , Gempt J, , Buchmann N, & Pape H, : Predictive value and safety of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring with motor evoked potentials in glioma surgery. Neurosurgery 70:10601071, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Linskey ME, , Andrews DW, , Asher AL, , Burri SH, , Kondziolka D, & Robinson PD, : The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol 96:4568, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Minniti G, , Clarke E, , Lanzetta G, , Osti MF, , Trasimeni G, & Bozzao A, : Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: analysis of outcome and risk of brain radionecrosis. Radiat Oncol 6:48, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Narita Y, & Shibui S: Strategy of surgery and radiation therapy for brain metastases. Int J Clin Oncol 14:275280, 2009

  • 19

    Neuloh G, , Pechstein U, , Cedzich C, & Schramm J: Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 54:10611072, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Neuloh G, , Pechstein U, , Cedzich C, & Schramm J: Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 61:1 Suppl 337348, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Neuloh G, , Pechstein U, & Schramm J: Motor tract monitoring during insular glioma surgery. J Neurosurg 106:582592, 2007

  • 22

    Neuloh G, & Schramm J: Monitoring of motor evoked potentials compared with somatosensory evoked potentials and microvascular Doppler ultrasonography in cerebral aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 100:389399, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Pechstein U, , Cedzich C, , Nadstawek J, & Schramm J: Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery 39:335344, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Penfield W, & Boldrey E: Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 60:389443, 1937

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Rades D, , Hornung D, , Veninga T, , Schild SE, & Gliemroth J: Single brain metastasis: radiosurgery alone compared with radiosurgery plus up-front whole-brain radiotherapy. Cancer 118:29802985, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Rades D, , Kueter JD, , Meyners T, , Pluemer A, , Veninga T, & Gliemroth J, : Single brain metastasis: resection followed by whole-brain irradiation and a boost to the metastatic site compared to whole-brain irradiation plus radiosurgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 114:326330, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Rades D, , Veninga T, , Hornung D, , Wittkugel O, , Schild SE, & Gliemroth J: Single brain metastasis: whole-brain irradiation plus either radiosurgery or neurosurgical resection. Cancer 118:11381144, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Raore B, , Schniederjan M, , Prabhu R, , Brat DJ, , Shu HK, & Olson JJ: Metastasis infiltration: an investigation of the postoperative brain-tumor interface. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:10751080, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Rowed DW, , Houlden DA, & Basavakumar DG: Somatosensory evoked potential identification of sensorimotor cortex in removal of intracranial neoplasms. Can J Neurol Sci 24:116120, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Sanai N, & Berger MS: Intraoperative stimulation techniques for functional pathway preservation and glioma resection. Neurosurg Focus 28:2 E1, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Scheufler KM, & Zentner J: Total intravenous anesthesia for intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathways: an integral view combining clinical and experimental data. J Neurosurg 96:571579, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Suess O, , Suess S, , Brock M, & Kombos T: Intraoperative electrocortical stimulation of Brodman area 4: a 10-year analysis of 255 cases. Head Face Med 2:20, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Szelényi A, , Langer D, , Kothbauer K, , De Camargo AB, , Flamm ES, & Deletis V: Monitoring of muscle motor evoked potentials during cerebral aneurysm surgery: intraoperative changes and postoperative outcome. J Neurosurg 105:675681, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Taniguchi M, , Cedzich C, & Schramm J: Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery 32:219226, 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Williams BJ, , Suki D, , Fox BD, , Pelloski CE, , Maldaun MV, & Sawaya RE, : Stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors: a comprehensive review of complications. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 111:439448, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 324 133 6
Full Text Views 227 19 2
PDF Downloads 121 14 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0