Apparent diffusion coefficients for evaluation of the response of brain tumors treated by Gamma Knife surgery

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Cellular density is a major factor for change in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). The authors hypothesized that loss of tumor cells after Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) may alter the ADC value and used diffusion weighted MR imaging (DW imaging) to evaluate cellular changes in brain tumors to detect their treatment response and the efficacy of GKS.

Methods

In this paper the authors describe a prospective trial involving 86 patients harboring 38 solid or predominantly solid brain metastases, 30 meningiomas, and 24 acoustic neuromas that were treated by GKS. The patients underwent serial MR imaging examinations, including DW imaging, before treatment and at multiple intervals following GKS. Follow-up MR images and clinical outcomes were reviewed at 3-month intervals for metastatic lesions and at 6-month intervals for benign tumors. Apparent diffusion coefficients were calculated from echoplanar DW images, and mean ADC values were compared at each follow-up.

Results

The mean ADC value for all meningiomas was 0.82 ± 0.15 × 10−3 mm2/sec before GKS. The mean ADC value as of the last mean follow-up of 42 months was 1.36 ± 0.19 × 10−3 mm2/sec, a significant increase compared to that before treatment (p < 0.0001). Calcification (p = 0.006) and tumor recurrence (p = 0.025) significantly prevented a rise in the ADC level.

The mean ADC value for all solid acoustic neuromas was 1.06 ± 0.17 × 10−3 mm2/sec before GKS. The mean ADC value as of the last mean follow-up of 36 months was 1.72 ± 0.26 × 10−3 mm2/sec, a significant increase (p = 0.0002) compared with values before GKS. At the last mean MR imaging follow-up there appeared to be tumor enlargement in 3 patients (12.5%); however, since the ADC values in these patients were significantly higher than the preradiosurgery values, the finding was considered to be a sign of radiation necrosis rather than tumor recurrence.

The mean ADC value of metastatic tumors was 1.05 ± 0.12 × 10−3 mm2/sec before GKS. This value rose significantly (p < 0.0001) to 1.64 ± 0.18 × 10−3 mm2/sec after GKS at a mean follow-up of 9.4 months. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that 89% of these tumors had been controlled by GKS. In 2 patients there were enlarged lesions, but the ADC values were the same as pre-GKS levels, and therefore, the lesions were deemed recurrent.

Conclusions

Apparent diffusion coefficient values may be useful in evaluating treatment results before a definitive change in volume is evident on imaging studies. In some patients in whom imaging findings are equivocal, ADC values may also be used to distinguish radiation-induced necrosis from tumor recurrence.

Abbreviations used in this paper: ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient; DW = diffusion weighted; GKS = Gamma Knife surgery; ROI = region of interest.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Chuan-Fu Huang, M.D., Gamma Knife Center, Chung-Shan Medical University, 110 Chien-Kuo North Road, Section 1, Taichung 402, Taiwan. email: gk@csh.org.tw.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
References
  • 1

    Adler JRCox RSKaplan IMartin DP: Stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of brain metastases. J Neurosurg 76:4444491992

  • 2

    Chenevert TLMcKeever PERoss BD: Monitoring early response of experimental brain tumors to therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Cancer Res 3:145714661997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Chenevert TLStegman LDTaylor JMRobertson PLGreenberg HSRehemtulla A: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:202920362000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Filippi CGEdgar MAUluğ AMProwda JCHeier LAZimmerman RD: Appearance of meningiomas on diffusion-weighted images: correlating diffusion constants with histopathologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:65722001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Guzman RBarth ALövblad KOEl-Koussy MWeis JSchroth G: Use of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating purulent brain processes from cystic brain tumors. J Neurosurg 97:110111072002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Hakyemez BYildirim NGokalp GErdogan CParlak M: The contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to distinguishing typical from atypical meningiomas. Neuroradiology 48:5135202006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Hasegawa TKondziolka DFlickinger JCGermanwala ALunsford LD: Brain metastases treated with radiosurgery alone: an alternative to whole brain radiotherapy?. Neurosurgery 52:131813262003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Huang CFChou HHTu HTYang MSLee JKLin LY: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging as an evaluation of the response of brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiosurgery. Surg Neurol 69:62682008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kauppinen RA: Monitoring cytotoxic tumour treatment response by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and proton spectroscopy. NMR Biomed 15:6172002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kono KInoue YNakayama KShakudo MMorino MOhata K: The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:108110882001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Le Bihan DBreton ELallemand DGrenier PCabanis ELaval-Jeantet M: MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 161:4014071986

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Leksell L: Stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46:7978031983

  • 13

    Linskey MEMartinez AJKondziolka DFlickinger JCMaitz AHWhiteside T: The radiobiology of human acoustic schwannoma xenografts after stereotactic radiosurgery evaluated in the subrenal capsule of athymic mice. J Neurosurg 78:6456531993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Lunsford LDWitt TCKondziolka DFlickinger JC: Stereotactic radiosurgery of anterior skull base tumors. Clin Neurosurg 42:991181995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Mardor YPfeffer RSpiegelmann RRoth YMaier SENissim O: Early detection of response to radiation therapy in patients with brain malignancies using conventional and high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 21:109411002003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Minamikawa SKono KNakayama KYokote HTashiro TNishio A: Glucocorticoid treatment of brain tumor patients: changes of apparent diffusion coefficient values measured by MR diffusion imaging. Neuroradiology 46:8058112004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Moffat BAChenevert TLLawrence TSMeyer CRJohnson TDDong Q: Functional diffusion map: a noninvasive MRI biomarker for early stratification of clinical brain tumor response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:552455292005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Mori HAbe OAoki SMasumoto TYoshikawa TKunimatsu A: Hemorrhagic brain metastases with high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted MR images. A case report. Acta Radiol 43:5635662002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Okamoto KIto JIshikawa KSakai KTokiguchi S: Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging in differential diagnosis of brain tumors and tumor-like conditions. Eur Radiol 10:134213502000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Palumbo BAngotti FMarano GD: Relationship between PET-FDG and MRI apparent diffusion coefficients in brain tumors. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53:17222009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Stadnik TWChaskis CMichotte AShabana WMvan Rompaey KLuypaert R: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of intracerebral masses: comparison with conventional MR imaging and histologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:9699762001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Sugahara TKorogi YKochi MIkushima IShigematu YHirai T: Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echoplanar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:53601999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Tomura NNarita KIzumi JSuzuki AAnbai AOtani T: Diffusion changes in a tumor and peritumoral tissue after stereotactic irradiation for brain tumors: possible prediction of treatment response. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:4965002006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Tsuzuki TTsunoda SSakaki TKonishi NHiasa YNakamura M: Tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis associated with the Gamma Knife effect. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 66:Suppl 139481996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Yamasaki FKurisu KSatoh KArita KSugiyama KOhtaki M: Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging. Radiology 235:9859912005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Zhao MPipe JGBonnett JEvelhoch JL: Early detection of treatment response by diffusion-weighted 1H-NMR spectroscopy in a murine tumour in vivo. Br J Cancer 73:61641996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 361 356 101
Full Text Views 114 88 1
PDF Downloads 63 51 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar