Prospective evaluation of a dedicated spine radiosurgery program using the Elekta Synergy S system

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Cone beam CT (CBCT) image guidance has recently been adopted for the delivery of spine radiosurgery. In 2007, the authors' institution began a dedicated spine radiosurgery program using the Elekta Synergy S system, which incorporates CBCT technology. In this study, the authors prospectively evaluated the Synergy S platform as a dedicated spine radiosurgery delivery system, including an evaluation of the accuracy of patient positioning using this technology, as part of a quality assurance program.

Methods

One hundred sixty-six spine and paraspinal lesions were treated using the Elekta Synergy S 6-MV LINAC with a beam modulator and CBCT image guidance combined with a HexaPOD couch that allows correction of patient positioning in 3 translational and 3 rotational directions. Stratifying the lesion by location, there were 28 cervical, 69 thoracic, 48 lumbar, and 21 sacral lesions. The most common histological types for the metastatic lesions (136 cases total) were breast, lung, sarcomas, and renal cells. The most common benign tumors (30 cases total) included 10 schwannomas, 5 neurofibromas, and 5 meningiomas. Twenty-eight lesions (17%) were intradural. To measure intratreatment patient movement, 3 quality assurance CBCTs were performed and recorded at separate times: immediately before treatment started; at the first third of the procedure; and at the second third of the procedure. The positioning data and fused images of the planning CT and CBCT were analyzed to determine intrafraction patient movements. From each of 3 quality assurance CBCT images, 3 translational and 3 rotational coordinates were obtained.

Results

The prescribed dose to the gross tumor volume, delivered in a single fraction, ranged from 12 to 20 Gy (mean 16 Gy) in this cohort. This dose was delivered by between 7 and 14 coplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy beams (mean 9 beams). The gross tumor volumes ranged from 1.2 to 491.7 cm3 (mean 39.2 cm3). Mean treatment time including setup was 64 minutes. At the first third of the treatment, the magnitude of the 3D translational vector (X, Y, Z) was 1.1 ± 0.7 mm. Similarly, the 3D translational vector at the second third of the treatment was 1.0 ± 0.6 mm. The means ± SDs of the rotational angles were 0.2° ± 0.4°, 0.4° ± 0.5°, and 0.3° ± 0.5° along yaw, roll, and pitch, respectively, at the first third of the treatment, and 0.2° ± 0.3°, 0.4° ± 0.5°, and 0.4° ± 0.5°, respectively, at the second third of the treatment.

Conclusions

Single-fraction spine radiosurgery performed using the Synergy S platform and incorporating CBCT image guidance was determined to be feasible, accurate, and safe. This technique provides an overall translational position accuracy of < 2.0 mm.

Abbreviations used in this paper: CBCT = cone beam CT; IMRT = intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Peter C. Gerszten, M.D., M.P.H., Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Presbyterian, Suite B-400, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213. email: gersztenpc@upmc.edu.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Photograph showing the Synergy S system, which combines a LINAC with an onboard, integrated high-resolution 3D volume imaging system that allows the target to be visualized at the precise time of treatment while the patient is in position on the treatment couch. The cone beam imaging system is located in a position orthogonal to the LINAC beam. The robotic couch is adjusted in 3 translations and 3 rotations to ensure that the radiation is directed precisely to the target.

  • View in gallery

    Cone beam CT images obtained during patient setup and positioning for treatment, showing extremely high spatial resolution of both bone structures and soft tissue, making possible the setup of sites with submillimeter targeting errors. Sagittal (left) and axial (right) CBCT images displaying an overlay match of the planning CT and the CBCT, obtained with the patient on the treatment couch at the time of radiosurgery.

  • View in gallery

    Representative case of a 35-year-old man with an intradural hemangioblastoma located at the L-1 level on the right side. Coronal (A) and axial (B) images of the treatment plan. C: Eleven coplanar beams were used. D: The dose–volume histogram of the radiosurgery plan. Details of this case are found in the Illustrative Case section.

References

  • 1

    Adler JR JrChang SDMurphy MJDoty JRGeis PHancock SL: The Cyberknife: a frameless robotic system for radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 69:1241281997

  • 2

    Amendola BEWolf ALCoy SRAmendola MBloch L: Gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of patients with single and multiple brain metastases from carcinoma of the breast. Cancer J 6:88922000

  • 3

    Benzil DLSaboori MMogilner AYRocchio RMoorthy CR: Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for tumors of the spine. J Neurosurg 101:Suppl 34134182004

  • 4

    Bilsky MHYamada YYenice KMLovelock MHunt MGutin PH: Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy of paraspinal tumors: a preliminary report. Neurosurgery 54:8238312004

  • 5

    Chang ELShiu ASLii MFRhines LDMendel EMahajan A: Phase I clinical evaluation of near-simultaneous computed tomographic image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:128812942004

  • 6

    Chang SHancock SGibbs ICAdler JR JrSpinal cord arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Gerszten PCRyu S: Spine Radiosurgery New YorkThieme2009. 123127

  • 7

    Chang SDAdler JR Jr: Current status and optimal use of radiosurgery. Oncology (Williston Park) 15:2092212001

  • 8

    Colombo FPozza FChierego GCasentini LDe Luca GFrancescon P: Linear accelerator radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: an update. Neurosurgery 34:14211994

  • 9

    Cosgrove VPJahn UPfaender MBauer SBudach VWurm RE: Commissioning of a micro multi-leaf collimator and planning system for stereotactic radiosurgery. Radiother Oncol 50:3253361999

  • 10

    De Salles AAPedroso AGMedin PAgazaryan NSolberg TCabatan-Awang C: Spinal lesions treated with Novalis shaped beam intensity-modulated radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy. J Neurosurg 101:Suppl 34354402004

  • 11

    Gagnon GJNasr NMLiao JJMolzahn IMarsh DMcRae D: Treatment of spinal tumors using CyberKnife fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery: pain and quality-of-life assessment after treatment in 200 patients. Neurosurgery 64:2973072009

  • 12

    Gerszten PCBurton SAOzhasoglu CVogel WJWelch WCBaar J: Stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Neurosurg Spine 3:2882952005

  • 13

    Gerszten PCBurton SAOzhasoglu CWelch WC: Radiosurgery for spinal metastases: clinical experience in 500 cases from a single institution. Spine 32:1931992007

  • 14

    Gerszten PCGermanwala ABurton SAWelch WCOzhasoglu CVogel WJ: Combination kyphoplasty and spinal radiosurgery: a new treatment paradigm for pathological fractures. J Neurosurg Spine 3:2963012005

  • 15

    Gerszten PCMendel EYamada Y: Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for metastatic spine disease: what are the options, indications, and outcomes?. Spine 34:22 SupplS78S922009

  • 16

    Gerszten PCMonaco EA IIIQuader MNovotny J JrKim JOFlickinger JC: Setup accuracy of spine radiosurgery using cone beam computed tomography image guidance in patients with spinal implants. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 12:4134202010

  • 17

    Gerszten PCWelch WC: Cyberknife radiosurgery for metastatic spine tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 15:4915012004

  • 18

    Hamilton AJLulu BAFosmire HStea BCassady JR: Preliminary clinical experience with linear accelerator-based spinal stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 36:3113191995

  • 19

    Hansen EKLarson DAAubin MChen JDescovich MGillis AM: Image-guided radiotherapy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography for treatment of paraspinous tumors in the presence of orthopedic hardware. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66:3233262006

  • 20

    Hitchcock EKitchen GDalton EPope B: Stereotactic LINAC radiosurgery. Br J Neurosurg 3:3053121989

  • 21

    Isacsson UHagberg HJohansson KAMontelius AJung BGlimelius B: Potential advantages of protons over conventional radiation beams for paraspinal tumours. Radiother Oncol 45:63701997

  • 22

    Lovelock DMHua CWang PHunt MFournier-Bidoz NYenice K: Accurate setup of paraspinal patients using a noninvasive patient immobilization cradle and portal imaging. Med Phys 32:260626142005

  • 23

    Medin PMSolberg TDDe Salles AACagnon CHSelch MTJohnson JP: Investigations of a minimally invasive method for treatment of spinal malignancies with LINAC stereotactic radiation therapy: accuracy and animal studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52:111111222002

  • 24

    Milker-Zabel SZabel AThilmann CSchlegel WWannenmacher MDebus J: Clinical results of retreatment of vertebral bone metastases by stereotactic conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:1621672003

  • 25

    Pirzkall ALohr FRhein BHöss ASchlegel WWannenmacher M: Conformal radiotherapy of challenging paraspinal tumors using a multiple arc segment technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48:119712042000

  • 26

    Quader MANovotny JFlickinger JCHuq MSGerszten PC: Evaluation of patient positioning accuracy during stereotactic spinal radiosurgery using cone beam CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72:S5282008

  • 27

    Rock JPRyu SShukairy MSYin FFSharif ASchreiber F: Postoperative radiosurgery for malignant spinal tumors. Neurosurgery 58:8918982006

  • 28

    Ryu SFang Yin FRock JZhu JChu AKagan E: Image-guided and intensity-modulated radiosurgery for patients with spinal metastasis. Cancer 97:201320182003

  • 29

    Ryu SRock JRosenblum MKim JH: Patterns of failure after single-dose radiosurgery for spinal metastasis. J Neurosurg 101:Suppl 34024052004

  • 30

    Ryu SIChang SDKim DHMurphy MJLe QTMartin DP: Image-guided hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery to spinal lesions. Neurosurgery 49:8388462001

  • 31

    Sahgal AAmes CChou DMa LHuang KXu W: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is effective salvage therapy for patients with prior radiation of spinal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:7237312009

  • 32

    Saw CBAyyangar KMZhen WThompson RBEnke CA: Commissioning and quality assurance for MLC-based IMRT. Med Dosim 26:1251332001

  • 33

    Saw CBYang YLi FYue NJDing CKomanduri K: Performance characteristics and quality assurance aspects of kilovoltage cone-beam CT on medical linear accelerator. Med Dosim 32:80852007

  • 34

    Shiu ASChang ELYe J-SLii MRhines LDMendel E: Near simultaneous computed tomography image-guided stereotactic spinal radiotherapy: an emerging paradigm for achieving true stereotaxy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:6056132003

  • 35

    Shiu ASKooy HMEwton JRTung SSWong JAntes K: Comparison of miniature multileaf collimation (MMLC) with circular collimation for stereotactic treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:6796881997

  • 36

    Song DYKavanagh BDBenedict SHSchefter T: Stereotactic body radiation therapy. Rationale, techniques, applications, and optimization. Oncology (Williston Park) 18:1419–1430 1432:143514362004

  • 37

    Watchman CJHamilton RJStea BMignault AJ: Patient positioning using implanted gold markers with the Novalis Body system in the thoracic spine. Neurosurgery 62:5 SupplA62A682008

  • 38

    Yamada YBilsky MHLovelock DMVenkatraman ESToner SJohnson J: High-dose, single-fraction image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for metastatic spinal lesions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:4844902008

  • 39

    Yamada YLovelock DMBilsky MH: A review of imageguided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal tumors. Neurosurgery 61:2262352007

  • 40

    Yin FFRyu SAjlouni MYan HJin JYLee SW: Image-guided procedures for intensity-modulated spinal radiosurgery. Technical note. J Neurosurg 101:Suppl 34194242004

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 197 197 31
Full Text Views 89 89 1
PDF Downloads 144 144 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar