Quality of life in neurooncology—age matters

Clinical article

Nadia Veilleux, Philippe Goffaux Ph.D., Marie Boudrias, David Mathieu M.D., F.R.C.S.(C), Kathya Daigle B.Sc. and David Fortin M.D., F.R.C.S.(C)
View More View Less
  • Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

Due partly to therapeutic improvements and prolonged patient survival, the field of neurooncology is gradually undergoing a philosophical shift, progressively moving toward a more functional approach to patient welfare. This shift includes, as one of its defining objectives, the promotion of elevated levels of quality of life (QOL) and quality of health (QOH) for patients of all ages. Unfortunately, an adult life-stage perspective has never been used to study the long-lasting impact of age on well-being in neurooncology patients.

Methods

In this study, the authors assessed and compared the QOL and QOH scores of 42 younger adults (≤ 40 years of age) and 88 older adults (> 40 years of age) presenting with a primary supratentorial tumor.

Results

After having controlled for biomedical and treatment-related factors, the authors discovered that older adults reported lower functional well-being and poorer neurocognitive functioning than younger adults. This age difference appeared earlier than expected (developing as early as middle age), suggesting an accelerated effect of disease on the aging process. Importantly, it was also found that the variables that predict QOL and QOH differed depending on patient age. For example, support from friends was a significant predictor of QOL for younger adults, whereas the capacity to continue enjoying life was a significant predictor for older adults. Moreover, the presence of a high-grade tumor and increased physical pain had a negative impact on the QOH of younger adults, whereas increased difficulty with concentration negatively impacted the QOH of older adults.

Conclusions

These age differences clearly warn against consolidating the QOL or QOH scores of younger and older adults, and instead suggest that age at diagnosis is essential when considering patient perspective, and when establishing tailored support programs.

Abbreviations used in this paper: MANOVA = multivariate ANOVA; QOH = quality of health; QOL = quality of life; SNAS = Sherbrooke Neuro-Oncology Assessment Scale.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: David Fortin, M.D., F.R.C.S.(C), Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, 3001, Université de Sherbrooke, 12th Avenue North, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada J1H 5N4. email: David.Fortin@USherbrooke.ca.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online March 19, 2010; DOI: 10.3171/2010.2.JNS091707.

  • 1

    Aaronson NK, , Ahmedzai S, , Bergman B, , Bullinger M, , Cull A, & Duez NJ, : The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365376, 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Avis NE, & Deimling GT: Cancer survivorship and aging. Cancer 113:12 Suppl 35193529, 2008

  • 3

    Bloom JR, & Kessler L: Risk and timing of counseling and support interventions for younger women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 16:199206, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Bradley C: Importance of differentiating health status from quality of life. Lancet 357:78, 2001

  • 5

    Bradley C, & Speight J: Patient perceptions of diabetes and diabetes therapy: assessing quality of life. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 18:Suppl 3 S64S69, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Brandtstädter J, & Renner G: Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychol Aging 5:5867, 1990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Carstensen LL: Motivation for social contact across the life span: a theory of socioemotional selectivity. Nebr Symp Motiv 40:209254, 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Cella DF, , Tulsky DS, , Gray G, , Sarafian B, , Linn E, & Bonomi A, : The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11:570579, 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Cheng JX, , Zhang X, & Liu BL: Health-related quality of life in patients with high-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol 11:4150, 2009

  • 10

    Cimprich B, , Ronis DL, & Martinez-Ramos G: Age at diagnosis and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Cancer Pract 10:8593, 2002

  • 11

    Eklund JA: Relationships between ergonomics and quality in assembly work. Appl Ergon 26:1520, 1995

  • 12

    Eklund M: Work status, daily activities and quality of life among people with severe mental illness. Qual Life Res 18:163170, 2009

  • 13

    Goffaux P, , Boudrias M, , Mathieu D, , Charpentier C, , Veilleux N, & Fortin D: Development of a concise QOL questionnaire for brain tumor patients. Can J Neurol Sci 36:340348, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Greisinger AJ, , Lorimor RJ, , Aday LA, , Winn RJ, & Baile WF: Terminally ill cancer patients. Their most important concerns. Cancer Pract 5:147154, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Groenvold M, , Petersen MA, , Aaronson NK, , Arraras JI, , Blazeby JM, & Bottomley A, : The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: a shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. Eur J Cancer 42:5564, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Kroenke CH, , Rosner B, , Chen WY, , Kawachi I, , Colditz GA, & Holmes MD: Functional impact of breast cancer by age at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 22:18491856, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Mauer M, , Stupp R, , Taphoorn MJ, , Coens C, , Osoba D, & Marosi C, : The prognostic value of health-related quality-of-life data in predicting survival in glioblastoma cancer patients: results from an international randomised phase III EORTC Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups, and NCIC Clinical Trials Group study. Br J Cancer 97:302307, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Ownsworth T, , Hawkes A, , Steginga S, , Walker D, & Shum D: A biopsychosocial perspective on adjustment and quality of life following brain tumor: a systematic evaluation of the literature. Disabil Rehabil 31:10381055, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Rowland JH, Developmental stage and adaptation: adult model. Holland JC, & Rowland JH: Handbook of Psychooncology Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989. 2543

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Saarni SI, , Suvisaari J, , Sintonen H, , Koskinen S, , Härkänen T, & Lönnqvist J: The health-related quality-of-life impact of chronic conditions varied with age in general population. J Clin Epidemiol 60:12881297, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Santrock JW: A Topical Approach to Life-Span Development New York, McGraw-Hill, 2002

  • 22

    Schipper H, , Clinch J, , McMurray A, & Levitt M: Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index—Cancer: development and validation. J Clin Oncol 2:472483, 1984

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Speight J: Assessing the impact of diabetes screening on quality of life or quality of health?: semantics are important. Diabetes Care 25:18931894, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Stewart AL, , Ware JE Jr, & Brook RH: Advances in the measurement of functional status: construction of aggregate indexes. Med Care 19:473488, 1981

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Thornson JA, & Powell FC, A revised death anxiety scale. Neimeyer RA: Death Anxiety Handbook: Research, Instrumentation, and Application Washington DC, Taylor & Francis, 1994. 303381

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 415 316 4
Full Text Views 146 18 0
PDF Downloads 111 15 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0