Predictors of hearing preservation after stereotactic radiosurgery for acoustic neuroma

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Many patients with acoustic neuromas (ANs) have hearing function at diagnosis and desire to maintain it. To date, radiosurgical techniques have been focused on conformal irradiation of the tumor mass, with less attention to inner ear structures for which there was scant radiobiological information. The authors of this study evaluated tumor control and hearing preservation as they relate to tumor volume, imaging characteristics, and nerve and cochlear radiation dose following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using the Gamma Knife.

Methods

Seventy-seven patients with ANs had serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson [GR] Class I or II) and underwent SRS between 2004 and 2007. This interval reflected more recent measurements of inner ear dosimetry during the authors' 21-year experience. The median patient age was 52 years (range 22–82 years). No patient had undergone any prior treatment for the ANs. The median tumor volume was 0.75 cm3 (range 0.07–7.7 cm3), and the median radiation dose to the tumor margin was 12.5 Gy (range 12–13 Gy). At diagnosis, a greater distance from the lateral tumor to the end of the internal auditory canal correlated with better hearing function.

Results

At a median of 20 months after SRS, no patient required any other additional treatment. Serviceable hearing was preserved in 71% of all patients and in 89% (46 patients) of those with GR Class I hearing. Significant prognostic factors for maintaining the same GR class included (all pre-SRS) GR Class I hearing, a speech discrimination score (SDS) ≥ 80%, a pure tone average (PTA) < 20 dB, and a patient age < 60 years. Significant prognostic factors for serviceable hearing preservation were (all pre-SRS) GR Class I hearing, an SDS ≥ 80%, a PTA < 20 dB, a patient age < 60 years, an intracanalicular tumor location, and a tumor volume < 0.75 cm3. Patients who received a radiation dose of < 4.2 Gy to the central cochlea had significantly better hearing preservation of the same GR class. Twelve of 12 patients < 60 years of age who had received a cochlear dose < 4.2 Gy retained serviceable hearing at 2 years post-SRS.

Conclusions

As currently practiced, SRS with the Gamma Knife preserves serviceable hearing in the majority of patients. Tumor volume and anatomy relate to the hearing level before radiosurgery and influence technique. A low radiosurgical dose to the cochlea enhances hearing preservation.

Abbreviations used in this paper:AN = acoustic neuroma; GR = Gardner-Robertson; IAC = internal auditory canal; PTA = pure tone average; SDS = speech discrimination score; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; SRT = stereotactic radiotherapy.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Douglas Kondziolka, M.D., F.R.C.S.(C), University of Pittsburgh, Suite B-400, UPMC Presbyterian, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213. email:kondziolkads@upmc.edu.Please include this information when citing this paper: published online March 13, 2009; DOI: 10.3171/2008.12.JNS08611.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Chang SDGibbs ICSakamoto GTLee EOyelese AAdler JR Jr: Staged stereotactic irradiation for acoustic neuroma. Neurosurgery 56:125412632005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Chopra RKondziolka DNiranjan ALunsford LDFlickinger JC: Long-term follow-up of acoustic schwannoma radiosurgery with marginal tumor doses of 12 to 13 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:8458512007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Delbrouck CHassid SMassager NChoufani GDavid PDevriendt D: Preservation of hearing in vestibular schwannomas treated by radiosurgery using Leksell Gamma Knife: preliminary report of a prospective Belgian clinical study. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 57:1972042003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Flickinger JCKondziolka DNiranjan ALundford LD: Results of acoustic neuroma radiosurgery: an analysis of 5 years' experience using current methods. J Neurosurg 94:162001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Flickinger JCKondziolka DNiranjan AMaitz AVoynov GLunsford LD: Acoustic neuroma radiosurgery with marginal tumor doses of 12 to 13 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:2252302004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Flickinger JCKondziolka DPollock BELunsford LD: Evolution of technique for vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery and effect on outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36:2752801996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Fuss MDebus JLohr FHuber PRhein BEngenhart-Cabillic R: Conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for acoustic neuromas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48:138113872000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Gardner GRobertson JH: Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 97:55661988

  • 9

    Karpinos MTeh BSZeck OCarpenter LSPhan CMai WY: Treatment of acoustic neuroma: stereotactic radiosurgery vs. microsurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:141014212002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kondziolka DLunsford LDMcLaughlin MRFlickinger JC: Long-term outcomes after radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas. N Engl J Med 339:142614331998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Koos WTDay JDMatula CLevy DI: Neurotopographic considerations in the microsurgical treatment of small acoustic neurinomas. J Neurosurg 88:5065121998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Lapsiwala SBPyle GMKaemmerle AWSasse FJBadie B: Correlation between auditory function and internal auditory canal pressure in patients with vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 96:8728762002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Lee FLinthicum F JrHung G: Proliferation potential in recurrent acoustic schwannoma following gamma knife radiosurgery versus microsurgery. Laryngoscope 112:9489502002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Levivier MMassager NDavid P: In vivo evaluation of tumor response to radiosurgery: application to vestibular schwannomas. Neurochirurgie 50:3203262004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Lunsford LDNiranjan AFlickinger JCMaitz AKondziolka D: Radiosurgery of vestibular schwannomas: summary of experience in 829 cases. J Neurosurg 102:1951992005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Massager NNissim ODelbrouck CDerpierre IDevriendt DDesmedt F: Irradiation of cochlear structures during vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery and associated hearing outcome. J Neurosurg 107:7337392007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Massager NNissim ODelbrouck CDevriendt DDavid PDesmedt F: Role of intracanalicular volumetric and dosimetric parameters on hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64:133113402006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Meijer OWMVandertop WPBaayen JCSlotman BJ: Singlefraction vs. fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: a single-institution study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56:139013962003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Neely JGHough JV: Histologic findings in two very small intracanalicular solitary schwannomas of the eighth nerve: II. “Onion bulbs”. Am J Otol 9:2162211988

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Niranjan ALunsford LDFlickinger JCMaitz AKondziolka D: Dose reduction improves hearing preservation rates after intracanalicular acoustic tumor radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 45:7537651999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Paek SHChung HTJeong SSPark CKKim CYKim JE: Hearing preservation after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery of vestibular schwannoma. Cancer 104:5805902005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Pollock BEDriscoll CLFoote RLLink MJGorman DABauch CD: Patient outcomes after vestibular schwannoma management: a prospective comparison of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 59:77852006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Sawamura YShirato HSakamoto TAoyama HSuzuki KOnimaru R: Management of vestibular schwannoma by fractionated stereotatic radiotherapy and associated cerebrospinal fluid malabsorption. J Neurosurg 99:6856922003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Szumacher ESchwartz MLTsao MJaywant SFranssen EWong CS: Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of vestibular schwannomas: combined experience of the Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre and the Princess Margaret Hospital. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:9879912002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Varlotto JMShrieve DCAlexander E IIIKooy HMBlack PMLoeffler JS: Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of acoustic neuromas: preliminary results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36:1411451996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Yamakami IUchino YKobayashi EYamaura A: Conservative management, gamma-knife radiosurgery, and microsurgery for acoustic neurinomas: a systematic review of outcome and risk of three therapeutic options. Neurol Res 25:6826902003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 907 884 24
Full Text Views 189 115 2
PDF Downloads 123 69 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar