The leadership of Women in Neurosurgery (WINS) has been asked by the Board of Directors of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) to compose a white paper on the recruitment and retention of female neurosurgical residents and practitioners.
Neurosurgery must attract the best and the brightest. Women now constitute a larger percentage of medical school classes than men, representing approximately 60% of each graduating medical school class. Neurosurgery is facing a potential crisis in the US workforce pipeline, with the number of neurosurgeons in the US (per capita) decreasing.
Women in the Neurosurgery Workforce
The number of women entering neurosurgery training programs and the number of board-certified female neurosurgeons is not increasing. Personal anecdotes demonstrating gender inequity abound among female neurosurgeons at every level of training and career development. Gender inequity exists in neurosurgery training programs, in the neurosurgery workplace, and within organized neurosurgery.
The consistently low numbers of women in neurosurgery training programs and in the workplace results in a dearth of female role models for the mentoring of residents and junior faculty/practitioners. This lack of guidance contributes to perpetuation of barriers to women considering careers in neurosurgery, and to the lack of professional advancement experienced by women already in the field. There is ample evidence that mentors and role models play a critical role in the training and retention of women faculty within academic medicine. The absence of a critical mass of female neurosurgeons in academic medicine may serve as a deterrent to female medical students deciding whether or not to pursue careers in neurosurgery. There is limited exposure to neurosurgery during medical school. Medical students have concerns regarding gender inequities (acceptance into residency, salaries, promotion, and achieving leadership positions). Gender inequity in academic medicine is not unique to neurosurgery; nonetheless, promotion to full professor, to neurosurgery department chair, or to a national leadership position is exceedingly rare within neurosurgery. Bright, competent, committed female neurosurgeons exist in the workforce, yet they are not being promoted in numbers comparable to their male counterparts. No female neurosurgeon has ever been president of the AANS, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, or Society of Neurological Surgeons (SNS), or chair of the American Board of Neurological Surgery (ABNS). No female neurosurgeon has even been on the ABNS or the Neurological Surgery Residency Review Committee and, until this year, no more than 2 women have simultaneously been members of the SNS. Gender inequity serves as a barrier to the advancement of women within both academic and community-based neurosurgery.
Strategic Approach to Address Issues Identified.
To overcome the issues identified above, the authors recommend that the AANS join WINS in implementing a strategic plan, as follows: 1) Characterize the barriers. 2) Identify and eliminate discriminatory practices in the recruitment of medical students, in the training of residents, and in the hiring and advancement of neurosurgeons. 3) Promote women into leadership positions within organized neurosurgery. 4) Foster the development of female neurosurgeon role models by the training and promotion of competent, enthusiastic, female trainees and surgeons.
Abbreviations used in this paper: AANS = American Association of Neurological Surgeons; ABNS = American Board of Neurological Surgery; CNS = Congress of Neurological Surgeons; RRC = Neurological Surgery Residency Review Committee of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; SNS = Society of Neurological Surgeons; WINS = Women in Neurosurgery.
British Medical Association (UK): Women in Academic Medicine Report, July 2007London, UK, British Medical Association, 2007. (http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/content/wam2007) [Accessed 21 December 2007])| false
DarvesB: New England Journal of Medicine:. Women in medicine force change in workforce dynamicsBoston, MA, NEJM Career Resources, 2005. (http://www.nejmjobs.org/career-resources/women-in-medicine.aspx) [Accessed 21 December 2007])| false
Government Affairs Program/American Geological Institute: Women and Minorities in ScienceWashington, DC, AGI, 2002. (http://www.agiweb.org/gap/legis107/womenscience.html) [Accessed 21 December 2007])| false
MorahanPS, , VoytkoML, , AbbuhlS, , MeansLJ, , WaraDW, & ThorsonJ, : Ensuring the success of women faculty at AMCs: lessons learned from the National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health. Acad Med76:19–31, 2001
MorahanPS, VoytkoML, AbbuhlS, MeansLJ, WaraDW, ThorsonJ, : Ensuring the success of women faculty at AMCs: lessons learned from the National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health. Acad Med76:19–31, 2001)| false
StrattonTD, , McLaughlinMA, , WitteFM, , FossonSE, & NoraLM: Does students' exposure to gender discrimination and sexual harassment in medical school affect specialty choice and residency program selection?. Acad Med80:400–408, 2005
StrattonTD, McLaughlinMA, WitteFM, FossonSE, NoraLM: Does students' exposure to gender discrimination and sexual harassment in medical school affect specialty choice and residency program selection?. Acad Med80:400–408, 2005)| false
WrightAL, , SchwindtLA, , BassfordTL, , ReynaVF, , ShisslakCM, & St GermainPA, : Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one US College of Medicine. Acad Med78:500–508, 2003
WrightAL, SchwindtLA, BassfordTL, ReynaVF, ShisslakCM, St GermainPA, : Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one US College of Medicine. Acad Med78:500–508, 2003)| false