The purpose of this study was to compare the margins of error of different shunt catheter approaches to the lateral ventricle and assess surface anatomical aiming landmarks for free-hand ventricular catheter insertion in adult patients with hydrocephalus.
Four adults who had undergone stereotactic brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and had normal ventricles, and 7 prospectively recruited adult patients with acute hydrocephalus were selected for inclusion in this study. Reconstructed MR images obtained prior to surgical intervention were geometrically analyzed with regard to frontal, parietal, and parietooccipital (occipital) approaches in both hemispheres.
The ventricular target zones were as follows: the frontal horn for frontal and occipital approaches, and the atrium/ posterior horn for parietal approaches. The range of possible angles for successful catheter insertion was smallest for the occipital approach (8° in the sagittal plane and 11° in the coronal plane), greater for parietal catheters (23 and 36°), and greatest for the frontal approach in models of hydrocephalic brains (42 and 30°; p < 0.001 for all comparisons except frontal vs parietal, which did not reach statistical significance). There was no single landmark for aiming occipital or parietal catheters that achieved ventricular target cannulation in every case. Success was achieved in only 86% of procedures using occipital trajectories and in 66% of those using parietal trajectories.
The occipital approach to ventricular catheter insertion provides the narrowest margin of error with regard to trajectory but has less aiming point variability than the parietal approach. The use of patient-specific stereotaxy rather than generic guides is required for totally reliable, first-pass ventricular catheterization via a posterior approach to shunt placement surgery in adults.
Abbreviation used in this paper: MR = magnetic resonance.
Address correspondence to: Christopher Lind, F.R.A.C.S., West Australian Neurosurgical Service, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia. email:
DickermanRDMcConathyWJMorganJStevensQEJolleyJTSchneiderS: Failure rate of frontal versus parietal approaches for proximal catheter placement in ventriculoperitoneal shunts: revisited. J Clin Neurosci12:781–7832005
DickermanRD, McConathyWJ, MorganJ, StevensQE, JolleyJT, SchneiderS, : Failure rate of frontal versus parietal approaches for proximal catheter placement in ventriculoperitoneal shunts: revisited. 12:781–783, 2005)| false